Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AUB vs WSFS vs IBCP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
AUB vs WSFS vs IBCP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $5.77B | $3.97B | $730M | $2.52B | $27.73B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.02B | $1.36B | $310M | $902M | $12.48B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $274M | $287M | $69M | $169M | $2.21B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 60.9% | 74.7% | 69.1% | 73.6% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.8% | 28.0% | 26.2% | 24.3% | 21.5% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 12.0x | 10.0x | 11.5x | 11.8x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.50B | $303M | $117M | $327M | $18.48B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $234M | $1.33B | $52M | $185M | $1.78B | $343.34B |
AUB vs WSFS vs IBCP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic Union Bank… (AUB) | 100 | 174.0 | +74.0% |
| WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS) | 100 | 262.2 | +162.2% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 238.9 | +138.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Huntington Bancshar… (HBAN) | 100 | 193.8 | +93.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AUB vs WSFS vs IBCP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AUB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 3.7%
- 28.2% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 3.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
WSFS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and bank quality is your priority.
- PEG 0.69 vs AUB's 10.65
- NIM 3.4% vs JPM's 2.2%
- PEG 0.69 vs 0.79
- +43.1% vs HBAN's +13.7%
IBCP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.72, yield 2.9%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.72 vs AUB's 1.11, lower leverage
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
Among these 6 stocks, HBAN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 194.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.2% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1% | |
| Value | PEG 0.69 vs 0.79 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs AUB's 1.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.1% vs HBAN's +13.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
AUB vs WSFS vs IBCP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AUB vs WSFS vs IBCP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WSFS leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • AUB leads 1 • IBCP leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • HBAN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSFS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 904.8x IBCP's $310M. IBCP is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AUB's 13.5%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $1.4B | $310M | $902M | $12.5B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $397M | $408M | $89M | $241M | $3.1B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $274M | $287M | $69M | $169M | $2.2B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $214M | $70M | $225M | $2.3B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.9% | +74.7% | +69.1% | +73.6% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +28.0% | +26.2% | +24.3% | +21.5% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +21.1% | +22.1% | +18.8% | +17.7% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +109.7% | +15.7% | +22.6% | +24.9% | +18.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.3% | +22.9% | +2.3% | +39.5% | -11.8% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IBCP and HBAN each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 45% valuation discount to AUB's 19.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HBAN offers better value at 0.84x vs AUB's 19.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.8B | $4.0B | $730M | $2.5B | $27.7B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.0B | $2.9B | $795M | $2.7B | $44.4B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.85x | 14.78x | 10.85x | 14.47x | 12.60x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.82x | 12.04x | 9.99x | 11.54x | 11.84x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 19.55x | 0.84x | 2.06x | 2.06x | 0.84x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.81x | 7.22x | 9.78x | 11.03x | 16.53x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.34x | 2.92x | 2.32x | 2.90x | 2.22x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 1.51x | 1.47x | 1.29x | 1.08x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 67.48x | 18.57x | 10.41x | 11.49x | 12.17x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WSFS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $6 for AUB. WSFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs AUB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | +10.6% | +14.2% | +9.5% | +10.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.4% | +1.3% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +9.5% | +10.2% | +7.9% | +5.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +10.3% | +2.6% | +2.4% | +4.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.11x | 0.23x | 0.17x | 0.76x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | -$1.0B | $65M | $142M | $16.7B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $234M | $1.3B | $52M | $185M | $1.8B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $303M | $117M | $327M | $18.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 1.30x | 0.91x | 1.05x | 0.62x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,094 for AUB. Over the past 12 months, WSFS leads with a +43.1% total return vs HBAN's +13.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs NBTB's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.5% | +37.3% | +12.0% | +17.6% | +1.1% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.5% | +43.1% | +16.4% | +18.3% | +13.7% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.3% | +97.3% | +110.4% | +48.5% | +76.8% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.9% | +52.7% | +80.9% | +44.4% | +43.4% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.1% | +129.1% | +194.4% | +108.5% | +133.4% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.8% | +25.4% | +28.1% | +14.1% | +20.9% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WSFS and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AUB's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSFS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs HBAN's 90.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 0.73x | 0.72x | 0.76x | 0.94x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.18 | $75.34 | $39.16 | $48.27 | $19.46 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.64 | $49.92 | $29.63 | $39.20 | $14.89 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +99.9% | +90.6% | +99.8% | +90.0% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.9 | 64.7 | 61.2 | 63.1 | 65.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 878K | 361K | 135K | 266K | 20.2M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
AUB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AUB as "Buy", WSFS as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", HBAN as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.0% upside for HBAN (target: $20) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, AUB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.69% vs WSFS's 0.91%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.50 | $79.00 | $38.00 | $46.00 | $20.33 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 13 | 7 | 10 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +0.9% | +2.9% | +3.0% | +3.4% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 1 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.49 | $0.68 | $1.03 | $1.43 | $0.60 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.3% | +1.7% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
WSFS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
AUB vs WSFS vs IBCP vs NBTB vs HBAN vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AUB or WSFS or IBCP or NBTB or HBAN or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) is the stronger pick with 28.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AUB or WSFS or IBCP or NBTB or HBAN or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
9x versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation at 19. 9x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WSFS Financial Corporation wins at 0. 69x versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 10. 65x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AUB or WSFS or IBCP or NBTB or HBAN or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +20. 9% for Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus AUB's +95. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AUB or WSFS or IBCP or NBTB or HBAN or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
72β versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 1. 11β — meaning AUB is approximately 54% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AUB or WSFS or IBCP or NBTB or HBAN or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) is pulling ahead at 28.
2% versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WSFS Financial Corporation grew EPS 15. 4% year-over-year, compared to -9. 4% for Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AUB or WSFS or IBCP or NBTB or HBAN or JPM?
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus 15. 9% for Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSFS leads at 28. 0% versus 19. 5% for AUB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSFS leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AUB or WSFS or IBCP or NBTB or HBAN or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 69x versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 10. 65x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBAN: 16. 0% to $20. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — AUB or WSFS or IBCP or NBTB or HBAN or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 0. 9% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).
09Is AUB or WSFS or IBCP or NBTB or HBAN or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 2. 9% yield, +194. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +194. 4%, AUB: +95. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AUB and WSFS and IBCP and NBTB and HBAN and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AUB is a small-cap high-growth stock; WSFS is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; HBAN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.