Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AUID vs IDN vs IDCC vs QLYS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
AUID vs IDN vs IDCC vs QLYS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $17M | $157M | $7.18B | $3.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $0.00 | $829M | $685M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $1M | $366M | $201M |
| Gross Margin | 96.5% | — | 83.4% | 83.1% |
| Operating Margin | -10.2% | — | 49.6% | 33.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 75.2x | 38.8x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $241K | $0.00 | $506M | $97M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $10M | $739M | $250M |
AUID vs IDN vs IDCC vs QLYS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| authID Inc. (AUID) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN) | 100 | 92.8 | -7.2% |
| InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) | 100 | 381.7 | +281.7% |
| Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) | 100 | 94.3 | -5.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AUID vs IDN vs IDCC vs QLYS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AUID is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 365.9%, EPS growth 55.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
- 365.9% revenue growth vs IDN's -100.0%
IDN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.41
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, current ratio 3.68x
- Beta 0.41, current ratio 3.68x
- Beta 0.41 vs AUID's 1.59
IDCC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 436.7% 10Y total return vs IDN's 322.3%
- 44.2% margin vs AUID's -10.1%
- 0.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
QLYS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.66 vs IDCC's 0.74
- Lower P/E (12.9x vs 38.8x), PEG 0.66 vs 0.74
- 19.1% ROA vs AUID's -145.1%, ROIC 47.5% vs -337.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 365.9% revenue growth vs IDN's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 38.8x), PEG 0.66 vs 0.74 | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.2% margin vs AUID's -10.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs AUID's 1.59 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +193.2% vs AUID's -79.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.1% ROA vs AUID's -145.1%, ROIC 47.5% vs -337.3% |
AUID vs IDN vs IDCC vs QLYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AUID vs IDN vs IDCC vs QLYS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IDCC leads in 3 of 6 categories
QLYS leads 1 • IDN leads 1 • AUID leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDCC and IDN operate at a comparable scale, with $829M and $0 in trailing revenue. IDCC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AUID's -10.1%. On growth, QLYS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $0 | $829M | $685M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | $2M | $489M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | $1M | $366M | $201M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $4M | $580M | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +96.5% | — | +83.4% | +83.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.2% | — | +49.6% | +33.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.1% | — | +44.2% | +29.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | — | +70.0% | +42.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -142.6% | -3.7% | -2.4% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.6% | -43.3% | -38.0% | +10.1% |
Valuation Metrics
QLYS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.5x trailing earnings, QLYS trades at a 26% valuation discount to IDCC's 23.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IDCC offers better value at 0.45x vs QLYS's 0.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $157M | $7.2B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $148M | $6.9B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.89x | — | 23.62x | 17.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 75.22x | 38.81x | 12.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.45x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 72.52x | 12.91x | 13.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 18.80x | — | 8.61x | 5.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.10x | 7.59x | 8.73x | 6.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 35.01x | 13.58x | 10.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — IDCC and QLYS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS delivers a 37.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-180 for AUID. AUID carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IDCC's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDN scores 6/9 vs AUID's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -180.2% | +6.8% | +33.4% | +37.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -145.1% | +5.2% | +17.7% | +19.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.4% | — | +40.9% | +47.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -116.3% | — | +38.1% | +37.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — | 0.46x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$10M | -$233M | -$153M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $10M | $739M | $250M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $240,884 | $0 | $506M | $97M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -670.14x | — | 11.48x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IDCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDCC five years ago would be worth $40,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $163 for AUID. Over the past 12 months, IDN leads with a +193.2% total return vs AUID's -79.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IDCC at 52.1% vs AUID's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.9% | +17.5% | -14.1% | -27.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -79.9% | +193.2% | +32.4% | -25.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.0% | +249.4% | +251.7% | -17.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -4.1% | +303.1% | -3.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +322.3% | +436.7% | +267.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.3% | +51.7% | +52.1% | -6.3% |
Risk & Volatility
IDN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IDN is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AUID's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IDN currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs AUID's 18.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 0.41x | 1.12x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.83 | $9.07 | $412.60 | $155.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.84 | $2.60 | $205.78 | $74.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.2% | +85.7% | +67.6% | +61.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 51.0 | 30.8 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 229K | 384K | 393K | 773K |
Analyst Outlook
IDCC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IDN as "Buy", IDCC as "Buy", QLYS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.5% upside for IDCC (target: $425) vs 9.4% for IDN (target: $9). IDCC is the only dividend payer here at 0.63% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.50 | $425.00 | $134.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 16 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.76 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +5.5% |
IDCC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). QLYS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AUID vs IDN vs IDCC vs QLYS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AUID or IDN or IDCC or QLYS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, authID Inc.
(AUID) is the stronger pick with 365. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN). Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) offers the better valuation at 17. 5x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AUID or IDN or IDCC or QLYS?
On trailing P/E, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the cheapest at 17. 5x versus InterDigital, Inc. at 23. 6x. On forward P/E, Qualys, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Qualys, Inc. wins at 0. 66x versus InterDigital, Inc. 's 0. 74x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AUID or IDN or IDCC or QLYS?
Over the past 5 years, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) delivered a total return of +303. 1%, compared to -98. 4% for authID Inc. (AUID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDCC returned +436. 7% versus AUID's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AUID or IDN or IDCC or QLYS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intellicheck, Inc.
(IDN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus authID Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning AUID is approximately 286% more volatile than IDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, authID Inc. (AUID) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 46% for InterDigital, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AUID or IDN or IDCC or QLYS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), authID Inc.
(AUID) is pulling ahead at 365. 9% versus -100. 0% for Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intellicheck, Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -2. 2% for InterDigital, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IDCC leads at 22. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AUID or IDN or IDCC or QLYS?
InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the more profitable company, earning 48. 8% net margin versus -1610. 6% for authID Inc. — meaning it keeps 48. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDCC leads at 55. 3% versus -1656. 5% for AUID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AUID leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AUID or IDN or IDCC or QLYS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus InterDigital, Inc. 's 0. 74x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 75. 2x for Intellicheck, Inc. — 62. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDCC: 52. 5% to $425. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AUID or IDN or IDCC or QLYS?
In this comparison, IDCC (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. AUID, IDN, QLYS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AUID or IDN or IDCC or QLYS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intellicheck, Inc.
(IDN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), +322. 3% 10Y return). authID Inc. (AUID) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDN: +322. 3%, AUID: -98. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AUID and IDN and IDCC and QLYS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AUID is a small-cap high-growth stock; IDN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IDCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QLYS is a small-cap deep-value stock. IDCC pays a dividend while AUID, IDN, QLYS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.