Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AVBH vs HTBK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
AVBH vs HTBK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $259M | $828M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $74M | $266M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 72.6% |
| Operating Margin | -34.8% | 25.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 13.3x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $40M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $22M |
Quick Verdict: AVBH vs HTBK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVBH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.54
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 7.8%
- PEG 0.62 vs HTBK's 2.32
HTBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 18.2%
- 76.4% 10Y total return vs AVBH's 37.1%
- NIM 3.2% vs AVBH's 1.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% NII/revenue growth vs AVBH's -3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 13.3x), PEG 0.62 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs AVBH's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs HTBK's 1.04 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.6% vs AVBH's +37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs AVBH's 0.7% |
AVBH vs HTBK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AVBH vs HTBK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTBK leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTBK is the larger business by revenue, generating $266M annually — 3.6x AVBH's $74M. AVBH is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTBK's 18.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $74M | $266M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | $71M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $61M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +72.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.8% | +25.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +32.3% | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +22.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +47.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AVBH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, AVBH trades at a 45% valuation discount to HTBK's 17.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AVBH offers better value at 0.68x vs HTBK's 3.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $259M | $828M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $273M | $847M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.57x | 17.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.76x | 13.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.68x | 3.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.49x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.81x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HTBK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AVBH delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for HTBK. HTBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVBH's 0.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HTBK scores 8/9 vs AVBH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.5% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.1% | +3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $40M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.82x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HTBK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVBH five years ago would be worth $13,714 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,048 for HTBK. Over the past 12 months, HTBK leads with a +53.6% total return vs AVBH's +37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTBK at 29.3% vs AVBH's 11.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.6% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.1% | +53.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.1% | +116.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.1% | +30.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.1% | +76.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.1% | +29.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVBH and HTBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVBH is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HTBK's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HTBK currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs AVBH's 94.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.61 | $13.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.54 | $8.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.1% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.6 | 56.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 83K | 740K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AVBH as "Buy" and HTBK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for AVBH (target: $35) vs 7.8% for HTBK (target: $15). HTBK is the only dividend payer here at 3.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.52 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
HTBK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AVBH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AVBH vs HTBK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVBH or HTBK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) is the stronger pick with 5.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH). Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVBH or HTBK?
On trailing P/E, Avidbank Holdings, Inc.
(AVBH) is the cheapest at 9. 6x versus Heritage Commerce Corp at 17. 2x. On forward P/E, Avidbank Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Avidbank Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus Heritage Commerce Corp's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVBH or HTBK?
Over the past 5 years, Avidbank Holdings, Inc.
(AVBH) delivered a total return of +37. 1%, compared to +30. 5% for Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HTBK returned +75. 1% versus AVBH's +37. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVBH or HTBK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avidbank Holdings, Inc.
(AVBH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Heritage Commerce Corp's 1. 04β — meaning HTBK is approximately 93% more volatile than AVBH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 8% for Avidbank Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVBH or HTBK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) is pulling ahead at 5.
8% versus -3. 8% for Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Commerce Corp grew EPS 18. 2% year-over-year, compared to 12. 7% for Avidbank Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVBH or HTBK?
Avidbank Holdings, Inc.
(AVBH) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 3% net margin versus 18. 0% for Heritage Commerce Corp — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HTBK leads at 25. 4% versus -34. 8% for AVBH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTBK leads at 72. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVBH or HTBK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Heritage Commerce Corp's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for Heritage Commerce Corp — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVBH: 17. 6% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVBH or HTBK?
In this comparison, HTBK (3.
8% yield) pays a dividend. AVBH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AVBH or HTBK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Heritage Commerce Corp (HTBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
04), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HTBK: +75. 1%, AVBH: +37. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVBH and HTBK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
HTBK pays a dividend while AVBH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.