Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AVR vs TMCI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs ZBH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
AVR vs TMCI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs ZBH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $237M | $130M | $2.04B | $466M | $16.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $207M | $674M | $307M | $8.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-84M | $-61M | $-173M | $-28M | $761M |
| Gross Margin | 67.9% | 79.7% | 75.2% | 53.7% | 70.0% |
| Operating Margin | -40.2% | -26.9% | -27.2% | -9.4% | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $14M | $290M | $0.00 | $7.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $11M | $103M | $56M | $592M |
AVR vs TMCI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs ZBH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anteris Technologie… (AVR) | 100 | 117.9 | +17.9% |
| Treace Medical Conc… (TMCI) | 100 | 27.0 | -73.0% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 60.0 | -40.0% |
| AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO) | 100 | 122.3 | +22.3% |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdi… (ZBH) | 100 | 77.9 | -22.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVR vs TMCI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs ZBH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 17.5% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 38.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.14, Low D/E 2.2%, current ratio 4.51x
- Beta 2.14, current ratio 4.51x
- +50.2% vs TMCI's -73.3%
TMCI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NVCR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 21.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
- 8.3% revenue growth vs ANGO's -3.8%
Among these 5 stocks, ANGO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ZBH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 1.2%
- 9.1% margin vs AVR's -39.4%
- Beta 0.60 vs TMCI's 2.19
- 1.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.3% revenue growth vs ANGO's -3.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs AVR's -39.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs TMCI's 2.19 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.2% vs TMCI's -73.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs AVR's -442.1% |
AVR vs TMCI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs ZBH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AVR vs TMCI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs ZBH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ZBH leads in 2 of 6 categories
AVR leads 0 • TMCI leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • ANGO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZBH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZBH is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.4B annually — 3931.2x AVR's $2M. ZBH is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVR's -39.4%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $207M | $674M | $307M | $8.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$84M | -$48M | -$165M | -$5M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$84M | -$61M | -$173M | -$28M | $761M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$79M | -$26M | -$48M | -$9M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.9% | +79.7% | +75.2% | +53.7% | +70.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | -26.9% | -27.2% | -9.4% | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.4% | -29.4% | -25.7% | -9.0% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -37.1% | -12.5% | -7.1% | -3.0% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.2% | -10.2% | +12.3% | +9.0% | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -54.1% | -12.0% | -100.0% | +42.3% | +34.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TMCI and NVCR and ZBH each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $237M | $130M | $2.0B | $466M | $16.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $168M | $133M | $2.2B | $410M | $23.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.75x | -2.16x | -14.66x | -13.49x | 23.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 9.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 9.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 87.79x | 0.61x | 3.11x | 1.59x | 1.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.13x | 1.46x | 5.86x | 2.51x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 10.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZBH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZBH delivers a 5.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-25 for AVR. AVR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVR scores 6/9 vs TMCI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.1% | -69.5% | -50.8% | -15.7% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.4% | -31.4% | -16.5% | -10.3% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -31.0% | -16.4% | -22.9% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -183.9% | -31.7% | -28.9% | -18.6% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.16x | 0.85x | — | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$69M | $3M | $187M | -$56M | $6.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $11M | $103M | $56M | $592M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $14M | $290M | $0 | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -816.06x | -16.02x | -96.80x | -258.19x | 4.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AVR and NVCR and ANGO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVR five years ago would be worth $11,750 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $610 for TMCI. Over the past 12 months, AVR leads with a +50.2% total return vs TMCI's -73.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANGO at 7.7% vs TMCI's -57.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.7% | -19.6% | +36.4% | -11.7% | -8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.2% | -73.3% | +2.6% | +20.7% | -12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.5% | -92.3% | -74.2% | +25.0% | -38.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.5% | -93.9% | -90.2% | -51.6% | -47.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.5% | -92.1% | +38.5% | -9.7% | -18.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.5% | -57.4% | -36.4% | +7.7% | -14.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVR and ZBH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZBH is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TMCI's 2.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVR currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs TMCI's 25.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.14x | 2.19x | 2.15x | 1.26x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.95 | $7.78 | $20.06 | $13.99 | $108.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.85 | $1.17 | $9.82 | $8.36 | $79.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +25.8% | +89.2% | +80.1% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.4 | 56.1 | 70.9 | 57.5 | 36.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 800K | 842K | 1.4M | 397K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AVR as "Buy", TMCI as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy", ANGO as "Hold", ZBH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 128.0% upside for AVR (target: $15) vs 17.0% for ZBH (target: $96). ZBH is the only dividend payer here at 1.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $3.00 | $33.50 | $16.50 | $96.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 9 | 15 | 11 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.0% |
ZBH leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
AVR vs TMCI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs ZBH: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVR or TMCI or NVCR or ANGO or ZBH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NovoCure Limited (NVCR) is the stronger pick with 8.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Anteris Technologies Global Corp. (AVR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AVR or TMCI or NVCR or ANGO or ZBH?
Over the past 5 years, Anteris Technologies Global Corp.
(AVR) delivered a total return of +17. 5%, compared to -93. 9% for Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. (TMCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVCR returned +38. 5% versus TMCI's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AVR or TMCI or NVCR or ANGO or ZBH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
(ZBH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. 's 2. 19β — meaning TMCI is approximately 268% more volatile than ZBH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Anteris Technologies Global Corp. (AVR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AVR or TMCI or NVCR or ANGO or ZBH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NovoCure Limited (NVCR) is pulling ahead at 8.
3% versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AngioDynamics, Inc. grew EPS 81. 9% year-over-year, compared to -194. 5% for Anteris Technologies Global Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMCI leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AVR or TMCI or NVCR or ANGO or ZBH?
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
(ZBH) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus -28. 2% for Anteris Technologies Global Corp. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZBH leads at 16. 5% versus -29. 0% for AVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TMCI leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AVR or TMCI or NVCR or ANGO or ZBH more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVR: 128.
0% to $15. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — AVR or TMCI or NVCR or ANGO or ZBH?
In this comparison, ZBH (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. AVR, TMCI, NVCR, ANGO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is AVR or TMCI or NVCR or ANGO or ZBH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
(ZBH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 1. 2% yield). Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. (TMCI) carries a higher beta of 2. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZBH: -18. 8%, TMCI: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AVR and TMCI and NVCR and ANGO and ZBH?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ZBH pays a dividend while AVR, TMCI, NVCR, ANGO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.