Regulated Water
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AWK vs GEV vs NEE vs SO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
AWK vs GEV vs NEE vs SO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Water | Renewable Utilities | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $24.54B | $300.69B | $198.92B | $105.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.21B | $39.38B | $27.93B | $30.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.10B | $9.38B | $8.18B | $4.36B |
| Gross Margin | 43.6% | 19.9% | 47.8% | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | 36.5% | 3.9% | 29.5% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | 20.6x | 40.3x | 23.6x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $15.92B | $0.00 | $95.62B | $65.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $8.85B | $2.81B | $1.64B |
AWK vs GEV vs NEE vs SO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Water Work… (AWK) | 100 | 102.8 | +2.8% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 818.3 | +718.3% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 149.3 | +49.3% |
| The Southern Company (SO) | 100 | 130.3 | +30.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AWK vs GEV vs NEE vs SO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AWK plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
GEV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.5% 10Y total return vs NEE's 274.2%
- +179.3% vs AWK's -13.5%
- 15.2% ROA vs SO's 2.8%, ROIC 27.9% vs 5.3%
NEE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 2.3%
- Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth -2.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.60x
- PEG 1.36 vs SO's 3.49
SO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.0% revenue growth vs GEV's 8.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.6x vs 40.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs SO's 14.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs GEV's 1.76 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 30-year raise streak, vs SO's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +179.3% vs AWK's -13.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs SO's 2.8%, ROIC 27.9% vs 5.3% |
AWK vs GEV vs NEE vs SO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AWK vs GEV vs NEE vs SO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GEV leads in 3 of 6 categories
SO leads 1 • AWK leads 0 • NEE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.4B annually — 7.6x AWK's $5.2B. NEE is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SO's 14.5%. On growth, GEV holds the edge at +16.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.2B | $39.4B | $27.9B | $30.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.8B | $2.2B | $15.5B | $13.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $9.4B | $8.2B | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.2B | $3.6B | -$3.8B | -$3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.6% | +19.9% | +47.8% | +43.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +3.9% | +29.5% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +23.8% | +29.3% | +14.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.1% | +9.2% | -13.6% | -12.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | +16.1% | +7.3% | +8.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +18.2% | +160.0% | -0.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.0x trailing earnings, AWK trades at a 65% valuation discount to GEV's 63.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NEE offers better value at 1.67x vs SO's 4.08x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24.5B | $300.7B | $198.9B | $105.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $40.3B | $291.8B | $291.7B | $169.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.05x | 63.25x | 28.99x | 23.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.63x | 40.26x | 23.59x | 20.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.80x | — | 1.67x | 4.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.55x | 130.23x | 19.01x | 12.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.78x | 7.90x | 7.24x | 3.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.26x | 25.12x | 3.00x | 2.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 81.03x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $10 for AWK. NEE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SO's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEV scores 6/9 vs SO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.1% | +79.7% | +12.7% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +15.2% | +3.9% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +27.9% | +4.1% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +6.6% | +4.7% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.47x | — | 1.44x | 1.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.8B | -$8.8B | $92.8B | $64.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $8.8B | $2.8B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.9B | $0 | $95.6B | $65.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.06x | — | 1.99x | 2.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $85,407 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,133 for AWK. Over the past 12 months, GEV leads with a +179.3% total return vs AWK's -13.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 104.4% vs AWK's -2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.9% | +64.8% | +18.6% | +8.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.5% | +179.3% | +46.8% | +5.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.5% | +754.1% | +33.8% | +37.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.7% | +754.1% | +42.0% | +62.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.9% | +754.1% | +274.2% | +141.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.9% | +104.4% | +10.2% | +11.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AWK and NEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWK is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GEV's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEE currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs AWK's 83.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.48x | 1.76x | 0.21x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $150.51 | $1181.95 | $98.75 | $100.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $121.28 | $387.03 | $63.88 | $83.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +94.7% | +96.6% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.4 | 63.8 | 57.2 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 2.4M | 8.7M | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NEE and SO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AWK as "Hold", GEV as "Buy", NEE as "Buy", SO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.2% upside for AWK (target: $135) vs 0.1% for GEV (target: $1120). For income investors, SO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.91% vs NEE's 2.35%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $134.67 | $1119.95 | $98.13 | $99.62 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 28 | 36 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +0.1% | +2.3% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 1 | 30 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.25 | $1.00 | $2.24 | $2.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GEV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AWK vs GEV vs NEE vs SO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AWK or GEV or NEE or SO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 9% for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) offers the better valuation at 22. 0x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AWK or GEV or NEE or SO?
On trailing P/E, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the cheapest at 22. 0x versus GE Vernova Inc. at 63. 3x. On forward P/E, The Southern Company is actually cheaper at 20. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NextEra Energy, Inc. wins at 1. 36x versus The Southern Company's 3. 49x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AWK or GEV or NEE or SO?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +754. 1%, compared to -8. 7% for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEV returned +754. 1% versus AWK's +100. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AWK or GEV or NEE or SO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 48β versus GE Vernova Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning GEV is approximately -467% more volatile than AWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 144% versus 169% for The Southern Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AWK or GEV or NEE or SO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus 8. 9% for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for NextEra Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWK leads at 10. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AWK or GEV or NEE or SO?
NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus 12. 8% for GE Vernova Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWK leads at 36. 6% versus 3. 6% for GEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEE leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AWK or GEV or NEE or SO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 36x versus The Southern Company's 3. 49x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, The Southern Company (SO) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 40. 3x for GE Vernova Inc. — 19. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AWK: 7. 2% to $134. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — AWK or GEV or NEE or SO?
In this comparison, SO (2.
9% yield), AWK (2. 6% yield), NEE (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. GEV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AWK or GEV or NEE or SO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 48), 2. 6% yield, +100. 9% 10Y return). GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWK: +100. 9%, GEV: +754. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AWK and GEV and NEE and SO?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
AWK, NEE, SO pay a dividend while GEV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.