Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AWX vs USPH vs CWST vs AFCG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AWX
Avalon Holdings Corporation

Waste Management

IndustrialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-31.1%
USPH
U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$897M
5Y Perf.-43.3%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.35B
5Y Perf.+34.4%
AFCG
Advanced Flower Capital Inc.

REIT - Specialty

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$73M
5Y Perf.-78.5%

AWX vs USPH vs CWST vs AFCG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AWX logoAWX
USPH logoUSPH
CWST logoCWST
AFCG logoAFCG
IndustryWaste ManagementMedical - Care FacilitiesWaste ManagementREIT - Specialty
Market Cap$10M$897M$5.35B$73M
Revenue (TTM)$85M$695M$1.88B$6M
Net Income (TTM)$585K$11M$7M$-20M
Gross Margin15.3%22.0%17.4%-76.6%
Operating Margin3.7%12.2%4.5%-124.7%
Forward P/E30.7x20.6x63.9x
Total Debt$35M$426M$1.24B$76M
Cash & Equiv.$4M$36M$124M$39M

AWX vs USPH vs CWST vs AFCGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AWX
USPH
CWST
AFCG
StockMar 21May 26Return
Avalon Holdings Cor… (AWX)10068.9-31.1%
U.S. Physical Thera… (USPH)10056.7-43.3%
Casella Waste Syste… (CWST)100134.4+34.4%
Advanced Flower Cap… (AFCG)10021.5-78.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AWX vs USPH vs CWST vs AFCG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: USPH leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Casella Waste Systems, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. AWX also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AWX
Avalon Holdings Corporation
The Momentum Pick

AWX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • -7.0% vs AFCG's -35.5%
Best for: momentum
USPH
U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc.
The Income Pick

USPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 3.1%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 1.5% margin vs AFCG's -333.9%
  • 3.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs AFCG's 28.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
The Growth Play

CWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
  • 10.6% 10Y total return vs AWX's 29.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
  • Beta 0.32, current ratio 1.26x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
AFCG
Advanced Flower Capital Inc.
The REIT Holding

AFCG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: real estate exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCWST logoCWST18.0% revenue growth vs AFCG's -39.6%
ValueUSPH logoUSPHBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsUSPH logoUSPH1.5% margin vs AFCG's -333.9%
Stability / SafetyCWST logoCWSTBeta 0.32 vs AFCG's 1.86
DividendsUSPH logoUSPH3.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs AFCG's 28.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)AWX logoAWX-7.0% vs AFCG's -35.5%
Efficiency (ROA)USPH logoUSPH0.9% ROA vs AFCG's -6.4%, ROIC 5.6% vs -4.1%

AWX vs USPH vs CWST vs AFCG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AWXAvalon Holdings Corporation
FY 2025
Deferred Membership Dues
78.3%$7M
Customer Advance Deposits
21.7%$2M
USPHU.S. Physical Therapy, Inc.
FY 2025
Net Patient Revenues
83.3%$650M
Other Revenues Including Management Contract Revenues and Industrial Injury Prevention Services Revenues
16.7%$131M
CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Collection
74.3%$1.2B
Processing Services
8.9%$144M
Transfer
8.8%$143M
Landfill Revenue
6.1%$98M
Transportation
1.4%$23M
Landfill - Gas To Energy
0.5%$8M
AFCGAdvanced Flower Capital Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AWX vs USPH vs CWST vs AFCG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAWXLAGGINGAFCG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

USPH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 314.8x AFCG's $6M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.5% (USPH) to -3.3% (AFCG). On growth, AFCG holds the edge at +64.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAWX logoAWXAvalon Holdings C…USPH logoUSPHU.S. Physical The…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…AFCG logoAFCGAdvanced Flower C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$85M$695M$1.9B$6M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$5M$107M$414M-$16M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$585,000$11M$7M-$20M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3M$67M$102M-$24M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+15.3%+22.0%+17.4%-76.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.7%+12.2%+4.5%-124.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.7%+1.5%+0.4%-3.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.0%+9.6%+5.5%-3.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.9%+7.7%+9.6%+64.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.8%-115.0%-18.6%+16.7%
USPH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AWX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 30.7x trailing earnings, AWX trades at a 96% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AWX's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWST's 15.7x.

MetricAWX logoAWXAvalon Holdings C…USPH logoUSPHU.S. Physical The…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…AFCG logoAFCGAdvanced Flower C…
Market CapShares × price$10M$897M$5.4B$73M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$41M$1.3B$6.5B$110M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS30.74x41.55x712.08x-3.25x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.63x63.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.35x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.97x12.52x15.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.12x1.15x2.91x2.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.27x1.16x3.46x0.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.80x14.71x63.17x6.47x
AWX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — AWX and USPH each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

AWX delivers a 1.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-11 for AFCG. AFCG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AWX's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWX scores 6/9 vs AFCG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAWX logoAWXAvalon Holdings C…USPH logoUSPHU.S. Physical The…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…AFCG logoAFCGAdvanced Flower C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.6%+1.4%+0.5%-11.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%+0.9%+0.2%-6.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.2%+5.6%+2.6%-4.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.8%+7.6%+2.9%-5.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96544
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.94x0.55x0.79x0.43x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$31M$390M$1.1B$38M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$36M$124M$39M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$35M$426M$1.2B$76M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.09x15.42x1.12x-2.15x
Evenly matched — AWX and USPH each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AWX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CWST five years ago would be worth $12,572 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,539 for AFCG. Over the past 12 months, AWX leads with a -7.0% total return vs AFCG's -35.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWX at -1.8% vs USPH's -17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAWX logoAWXAvalon Holdings C…USPH logoUSPHU.S. Physical The…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…AFCG logoAFCGAdvanced Flower C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.0%-24.6%-13.4%+10.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-7.0%-14.3%-28.9%-35.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-5.2%-43.7%-6.3%-20.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-43.9%-43.4%+25.7%-44.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+29.1%+22.6%+1059.4%-42.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.8%-17.4%-2.2%-7.2%
AWX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AWX and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AWX is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFCG's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWST currently trades 70.5% from its 52-week high vs AWX's 46.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAWX logoAWXAvalon Holdings C…USPH logoUSPHU.S. Physical The…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…AFCG logoAFCGAdvanced Flower C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.12x0.93x0.32x1.86x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.43$93.50$121.24$5.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.10$58.55$74.05$2.06
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+46.6%+63.1%+70.5%+52.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.246.152.848.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5K171K874K235K
Evenly matched — AWX and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — USPH and AFCG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: USPH as "Buy", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.9% upside for USPH (target: $102) vs 39.3% for CWST (target: $119). For income investors, AFCG offers the higher dividend yield at 28.10% vs USPH's 3.06%.

MetricAWX logoAWXAvalon Holdings C…USPH logoUSPHU.S. Physical The…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…AFCG logoAFCGAdvanced Flower C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$102.00$119.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1219
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.1%+28.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1510
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.80$0.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.6%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — USPH and AFCG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AWX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). USPH leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.

Best OverallAvalon Holdings Corporation (AWX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AWX vs USPH vs CWST vs AFCG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AWX or USPH or CWST or AFCG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). Avalon Holdings Corporation (AWX) offers the better valuation at 30. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (USPH) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AWX or USPH or CWST or AFCG?

On trailing P/E, Avalon Holdings Corporation (AWX) is the cheapest at 30.

7x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x. On forward P/E, U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AWX or USPH or CWST or AFCG?

Over the past 5 years, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) delivered a total return of +25. 7%, compared to -44. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus AFCG's -42. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AWX or USPH or CWST or AFCG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avalon Holdings Corporation (AWX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

12β versus Advanced Flower Capital Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning AFCG is approximately -1643% more volatile than AWX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 94% for Avalon Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AWX or USPH or CWST or AFCG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -39. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. grew EPS -22. 8% year-over-year, compared to -218. 8% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AWX or USPH or CWST or AFCG?

U.

S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (USPH) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 9% net margin versus -66. 0% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USPH leads at 10. 3% versus -43. 6% for AFCG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AFCG leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AWX or USPH or CWST or AFCG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, U.

S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (USPH) trades at 20. 6x forward P/E versus 63. 9x for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — 43. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USPH: 72. 9% to $102. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AWX or USPH or CWST or AFCG?

In this comparison, AFCG (28.

1% yield), USPH (3. 1% yield) pay a dividend. AWX, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AWX or USPH or CWST or AFCG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, AFCG: -42. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AWX and USPH and CWST and AFCG?

These companies operate in different sectors (AWX (Industrials) and USPH (Healthcare) and CWST (Industrials) and AFCG (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AWX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; USPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; AFCG is a small-cap income-oriented stock. USPH, AFCG pay a dividend while AWX, CWST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AWX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

USPH

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AFCG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 32%
  • Dividend Yield > 11.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AWX and USPH and CWST and AFCG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AWX: 9.9% · USPH: 7.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(AWX: 30.7x · USPH: 41.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.