Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AXIL vs AOUT vs SWBI vs RGR vs POWW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
AXIL vs AOUT vs SWBI vs RGR vs POWW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Leisure | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $49M | $143M | $647M | $622M | $236M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28M | $205M | $486M | $552M | $-5M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-10M | $12M | $-12M | $-80M |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 43.1% | 26.4% | 14.4% | 86.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | -4.7% | 4.6% | -4.1% | -120.9% |
| Forward P/E | 71.5x | 64.6x | 52.9x | 21.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $757K | $33M | $115M | $2M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $23M | $25M | $18M | $30M |
AXIL vs AOUT vs SWBI vs RGR vs POWW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXIL Brands, Inc. (AXIL) | 100 | 55.5 | -44.5% |
| American Outdoor Br… (AOUT) | 100 | 119.4 | +19.4% |
| Smith & Wesson Bran… (SWBI) | 100 | 105.9 | +5.9% |
| Sturm, Ruger & Comp… (RGR) | 100 | 90.1 | -9.9% |
| Outdoor Holding Com… (POWW) | 100 | 84.9 | -15.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AXIL vs AOUT vs SWBI vs RGR vs POWW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AXIL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 7.8%, current ratio 3.76x
- 5.0% margin vs POWW's -264.8%
- Beta 0.51 vs AOUT's 1.46, lower leverage
- 8.4% ROA vs POWW's -29.6%, ROIC 17.0% vs -17.6%
AOUT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.6%, EPS growth 99.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.5%
- 10.6% revenue growth vs SWBI's -11.4%
SWBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 3.6%
- -4.7% 10Y total return vs RGR's -4.9%
- Beta 0.70, yield 3.6%, current ratio 4.16x
- 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs RGR's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
RGR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, POWW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.6% revenue growth vs SWBI's -11.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.0% margin vs POWW's -264.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs AOUT's 1.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs RGR's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +59.9% vs AOUT's -19.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs POWW's -29.6%, ROIC 17.0% vs -17.6% |
AXIL vs AOUT vs SWBI vs RGR vs POWW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AXIL vs AOUT vs SWBI vs RGR vs POWW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SWBI leads in 3 of 6 categories
AOUT leads 1 • AXIL leads 1 • RGR leads 0 • POWW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWBI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RGR and POWW operate at a comparable scale, with $552M and -$5M in trailing revenue. AXIL is the more profitable business, keeping 5.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POWW's -2.6%. On growth, SWBI holds the edge at +17.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28M | $205M | $486M | $552M | -$5M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $344,000 | $30M | -$5M | $602,323 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | -$10M | $12M | -$12M | -$80M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$43,538 | $4M | $73M | $42M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.3% | +43.1% | +26.4% | +14.4% | +86.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | -4.7% | +4.6% | -4.1% | -120.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | -4.8% | +2.5% | -2.2% | -2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +1.7% | +15.0% | +7.7% | -27.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.2% | -3.3% | +17.1% | +4.1% | -54.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.3% | -25.8% | +122.4% | -97.8% | +105.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AOUT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 48.5x trailing earnings, SWBI trades at a 32% valuation discount to AXIL's 71.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AOUT's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RGR's 53.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $49M | $143M | $647M | $622M | $236M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45M | $153M | $736M | $606M | $207M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 71.50x | -1561.67x | 48.47x | -144.59x | -1.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 64.62x | 52.87x | 21.22x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 34.07x | 11.63x | 13.21x | 53.81x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 0.64x | 1.36x | 1.14x | 4.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.08x | 0.68x | 1.73x | 2.23x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.70x | — | — | 16.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AXIL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AXIL delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-34 for POWW. RGR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SWBI's 0.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AOUT scores 7/9 vs SWBI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | -5.8% | +3.3% | -4.2% | -33.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.4% | -4.1% | +2.2% | -3.5% | -29.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.0% | -0.1% | +4.1% | -3.0% | -17.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | -0.1% | +4.9% | -3.8% | -19.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.19x | 0.31x | 0.01x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $10M | $90M | -$17M | -$29M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $23M | $25M | $18M | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $757,441 | $33M | $115M | $2M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 406.67x | — | 5.17x | -335.34x | -10.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SWBI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SWBI five years ago would be worth $8,601 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,945 for POWW. Over the past 12 months, SWBI leads with a +59.9% total return vs AOUT's -19.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SWBI at 10.5% vs AXIL's -18.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.5% | +18.3% | +47.0% | +16.9% | +21.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.7% | -19.4% | +59.9% | +11.7% | +0.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.0% | +14.8% | +34.8% | -23.1% | +14.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.0% | -65.6% | -14.0% | -27.2% | -70.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.0% | -39.5% | -4.7% | -4.9% | -48.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.1% | +4.7% | +10.5% | -8.4% | +4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AXIL and SWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AXIL is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AOUT's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SWBI currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs AOUT's 69.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 1.46x | 0.70x | 0.94x | 1.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.25 | $13.46 | $15.79 | $48.21 | $2.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.28 | $6.26 | $7.73 | $28.33 | $1.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.8% | +69.6% | +92.1% | +81.0% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.1 | 55.0 | 48.2 | 35.6 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 154K | 38K | 597K | 163K | 582K |
Analyst Outlook
SWBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AOUT as "Buy", SWBI as "Buy", RGR as "Buy", POWW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.4% upside for AOUT (target: $13) vs 4.9% for SWBI (target: $15). For income investors, SWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs POWW's 1.25%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.50 | $15.25 | $46.00 | $2.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 4 | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.6% | +1.6% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.52 | $0.62 | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | +3.9% | +4.2% | +2.8% |
SWBI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). AOUT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AXIL vs AOUT vs SWBI vs RGR vs POWW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AXIL or AOUT or SWBI or RGR or POWW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Outdoor Brands, Inc.
(AOUT) is the stronger pick with 10. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) offers the better valuation at 48. 5x trailing P/E (52. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Outdoor Brands, Inc. (AOUT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AXIL or AOUT or SWBI or RGR or POWW?
On trailing P/E, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
(SWBI) is the cheapest at 48. 5x versus AXIL Brands, Inc. at 71. 5x. On forward P/E, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AXIL or AOUT or SWBI or RGR or POWW?
Over the past 5 years, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
(SWBI) delivered a total return of -14. 0%, compared to -70. 6% for Outdoor Holding Company (POWW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SWBI returned -4. 7% versus POWW's -48. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AXIL or AOUT or SWBI or RGR or POWW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AXIL Brands, Inc.
(AXIL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus American Outdoor Brands, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning AOUT is approximately 183% more volatile than AXIL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 31% for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AXIL or AOUT or SWBI or RGR or POWW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Outdoor Brands, Inc.
(AOUT) is pulling ahead at 10. 6% versus -11. 4% for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Outdoor Brands, Inc. grew EPS 99. 4% year-over-year, compared to -612. 5% for Outdoor Holding Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, AXIL leads at 124. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AXIL or AOUT or SWBI or RGR or POWW?
AXIL Brands, Inc.
(AXIL) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 3% net margin versus -264. 8% for Outdoor Holding Company — meaning it keeps 3. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SWBI leads at 5. 0% versus -120. 9% for POWW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POWW leads at 86. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AXIL or AOUT or SWBI or RGR or POWW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
(RGR) trades at 21. 2x forward P/E versus 64. 6x for American Outdoor Brands, Inc. — 43. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AOUT: 33. 4% to $12. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AXIL or AOUT or SWBI or RGR or POWW?
In this comparison, SWBI (3.
6% yield), RGR (1. 6% yield), POWW (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. AXIL, AOUT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AXIL or AOUT or SWBI or RGR or POWW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
(SWBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWBI: -4. 7%, AOUT: -39. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AXIL and AOUT and SWBI and RGR and POWW?
These companies operate in different sectors (AXIL (Consumer Defensive) and AOUT (Consumer Cyclical) and SWBI (Industrials) and RGR (Industrials) and POWW (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AXIL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AOUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SWBI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POWW is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SWBI, RGR, POWW pay a dividend while AXIL, AOUT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.