Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AZ vs CART vs AMZN vs DASH vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
AZ vs CART vs AMZN vs DASH vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $291M | $8.99B | $2.92T | $74.67B | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $3.86B | $742.78B | $14.72B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $485M | $90.80B | $925M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 27.1% | 73.0% | 50.6% | 50.9% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -350.6% | 15.9% | 11.5% | 4.9% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.6x | 34.8x | 64.3x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $36M | $152.99B | $3.75B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $637M | $86.81B | $4.38B | $30.71B |
AZ vs CART vs AMZN vs DASH vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| A2Z Cust2Mate Solut… (AZ) | 100 | 172.9 | +72.9% |
| Instacart (Maplebea… (CART) | 100 | 135.9 | +35.9% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 214.5 | +114.5% |
| DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) | 100 | 206.3 | +106.3% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 306.2 | +206.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AZ vs CART vs AMZN vs DASH vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CART is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 2.40x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 2.40x
- Lower P/E (16.6x vs 64.3x)
- Beta 0.39 vs AZ's 1.84, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, AMZN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DASH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.7%
- 27.9% revenue growth vs AZ's -37.0%
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.2%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- PEG 0.99 vs AMZN's 1.24
- 37.9% margin vs AZ's -483.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.9% revenue growth vs AZ's -37.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.6x vs 64.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs AZ's -483.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs AZ's 1.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs CART's -16.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs AZ's -38.6% |
AZ vs CART vs AMZN vs DASH vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AZ vs CART vs AMZN vs DASH vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 4 of 6 categories
CART leads 1 • AZ leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • DASH leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 113609.1x AZ's $7M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AZ's -4.8%. On growth, DASH holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $3.9B | $742.8B | $14.7B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | $721M | $155.9B | $1.6B | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $485M | $90.8B | $925M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | $883M | -$2.5B | $1.8B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | +73.0% | +50.6% | +50.9% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +15.9% | +11.5% | +4.9% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +12.6% | +12.2% | +6.3% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +22.9% | -0.3% | +11.9% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.4% | +13.6% | +16.6% | +33.1% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.3% | +50.0% | +74.8% | -4.5% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CART leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.7x trailing earnings, CART trades at a 70% valuation discount to DASH's 80.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.23x vs AMZN's 1.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $291M | $9.0B | $2.92T | $74.7B | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $278M | $8.4B | $2.98T | $74.0B | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.66x | 23.74x | 37.82x | 80.45x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.59x | 34.77x | 64.28x | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.35x | — | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.43x | 20.47x | 50.37x | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 40.54x | 2.40x | 4.07x | 5.44x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.64x | 4.22x | 7.14x | 7.50x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.87x | 378.98x | 34.34x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-44 for AZ. CART carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DASH's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs DASH's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -44.4% | +16.3% | +23.3% | +9.6% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.6% | +12.0% | +11.5% | +5.0% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +24.0% | +14.7% | +7.9% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | +18.9% | +15.3% | +6.6% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.01x | 0.37x | 0.37x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$601M | $66.2B | -$627M | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $637M | $86.8B | $4.4B | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $36M | $153.0B | $3.8B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -52.42x | — | 39.96x | — | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,409 for AZ. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs CART's -16.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs CART's 4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | -13.5% | +19.7% | -22.0% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.3% | -16.9% | +43.7% | -3.2% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.6% | +12.7% | +156.2% | +156.6% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.9% | +12.7% | +64.8% | +37.2% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +272.6% | +12.7% | +697.8% | -9.6% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.0% | +4.1% | +36.8% | +36.9% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CART and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CART is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AZ's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs AZ's 56.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.94x | 0.26x | 1.50x | 1.34x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.36 | $53.50 | $278.56 | $285.50 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.00 | $32.73 | $185.01 | $143.30 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.1% | +71.0% | +97.3% | +60.0% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 45.9 | 81.1 | 47.7 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 377K | 3.9M | 45.5M | 4.1M | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
GOOGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AZ as "Buy", CART as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", DASH as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 116.5% upside for AZ (target: $15) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $51.36 | $306.77 | $254.24 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 26 | 94 | 38 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +15.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CART leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AZ vs CART vs AMZN vs DASH vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AZ or CART or AMZN or DASH or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DoorDash, Inc.
(DASH) is the stronger pick with 27. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 0% for A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. (AZ). Instacart (Maplebear Inc. ) (CART) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. (AZ) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AZ or CART or AMZN or DASH or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Instacart (Maplebear Inc.
) (CART) is the cheapest at 23. 7x versus DoorDash, Inc. at 80. 4x. On forward P/E, Instacart (Maplebear Inc. ) is actually cheaper at 16. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AZ or CART or AMZN or DASH or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -65. 9% for A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. (AZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +1004% versus DASH's -13. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AZ or CART or AMZN or DASH or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Instacart (Maplebear Inc.
) (CART) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 26β versus A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. 's 1. 94β — meaning AZ is approximately 642% more volatile than CART relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Instacart (Maplebear Inc. ) (CART) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 37% for DoorDash, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AZ or CART or AMZN or DASH or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DoorDash, Inc.
(DASH) is pulling ahead at 27. 9% versus -37. 0% for A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. (AZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DoorDash, Inc. grew EPS 634. 5% year-over-year, compared to -86. 0% for A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AZ leads at 38. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AZ or CART or AMZN or DASH or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -237. 2% for A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -204. 2% for AZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CART leads at 73. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AZ or CART or AMZN or DASH or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Instacart (Maplebear Inc. ) (CART) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 64. 3x for DoorDash, Inc. — 47. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AZ: 116. 5% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AZ or CART or AMZN or DASH or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. AZ, CART, AMZN, DASH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AZ or CART or AMZN or DASH or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Instacart (Maplebear Inc.
) (CART) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 26)). A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. (AZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CART: +19. 7%, AZ: +283. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AZ and CART and AMZN and DASH and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (AZ (Technology) and CART (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and DASH (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CART is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; DASH is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.