Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AZTR vs MIRM vs SLDB vs KRYS vs QNCX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
AZTR vs MIRM vs SLDB vs KRYS vs QNCX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $3M | $5.17B | $551M | $8.75B | $7M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $410M | $0.00 | $417M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-799M | $-167M | $225M | $-84M |
| Gross Margin | — | -103.2% | — | 92.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -194.4% | — | 42.8% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 39.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $422M | $319M | $21M | $9M | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.07B | $297M | $60M | $496M | $6M |
AZTR vs MIRM vs SLDB vs KRYS vs QNCX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azitra, Inc. (AZTR) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Mirum Pharmaceutica… (MIRM) | 100 | 397.9 | +297.9% |
| Solid Biosciences I… (SLDB) | 100 | 134.9 | +34.9% |
| Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS) | 100 | 252.7 | +152.7% |
| Quince Therapeutics… (QNCX) | 100 | 8.6 | -91.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AZTR vs MIRM vs SLDB vs KRYS vs QNCX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AZTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.40
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 11.1%, current ratio 2.83x
- Beta 0.40, current ratio 2.83x
- Beta 0.40 vs SLDB's 2.42, lower leverage
MIRM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 54.7%, EPS growth 74.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 89.1%
- 54.7% revenue growth vs AZTR's -100.0%
SLDB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +173.0% vs QNCX's -87.5%
KRYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 26.9% 10Y total return vs MIRM's 6.8%
- Better valuation composite
- 53.9% margin vs MIRM's -195.0%
- 17.6% ROA vs MIRM's -98.5%, ROIC 18.0% vs -5.0%
Among these 5 stocks, QNCX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 54.7% revenue growth vs AZTR's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 53.9% margin vs MIRM's -195.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs SLDB's 2.42, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +173.0% vs QNCX's -87.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.6% ROA vs MIRM's -98.5%, ROIC 18.0% vs -5.0% |
AZTR vs MIRM vs SLDB vs KRYS vs QNCX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AZTR vs MIRM vs SLDB vs KRYS vs QNCX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KRYS leads in 2 of 6 categories
MIRM leads 1 • AZTR leads 0 • SLDB leads 0 • QNCX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRYS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRYS and QNCX operate at a comparable scale, with $417M and $0 in trailing revenue. KRYS is the more profitable business, keeping 53.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MIRM's -195.0%. On growth, KRYS holds the edge at +31.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $410M | $0 | $417M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$778M | -$168M | $185M | -$50M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$799M | -$167M | $225M | -$84M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$86M | -$173M | -$133M | $237M | -$48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -103.2% | — | +92.8% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -194.4% | — | +42.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -195.0% | — | +53.9% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -42.1% | — | +56.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% | — | +31.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.9% | -43.8% | +39.2% | +52.5% | -167.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MIRM and KRYS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KRYS's 49.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MIRM's 2461.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $5.2B | $551M | $8.7B | $7M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1.6B | $5.2B | $512M | $8.3B | $20M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.11x | -219.00x | -3.55x | 43.38x | -0.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 39.33x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2461.91x | — | 49.21x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 9.91x | — | 22.48x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 16.42x | 3.44x | 7.29x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 94.16x | — | 46.30x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-3 for MIRM. KRYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MIRM's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MIRM scores 6/9 vs QNCX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.3% | -2.9% | -73.6% | +19.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | -98.5% | -60.0% | +17.6% | -78.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | -5.0% | -120.8% | +18.0% | -4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | -3.7% | -100.3% | +14.8% | -64.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 1.02x | 0.12x | 0.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | $23M | -$39M | -$487M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $297M | $60M | $496M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $422M | $319M | $21M | $9M | $18M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.79x | -0.03x | -822.33x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MIRM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MIRM five years ago would be worth $55,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for AZTR. Over the past 12 months, SLDB leads with a +173.0% total return vs QNCX's -87.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MIRM at 57.5% vs AZTR's -93.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.8% | +31.8% | +29.7% | +20.2% | -95.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.4% | +149.7% | +173.0% | +116.9% | -87.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +290.5% | +30.7% | +238.5% | -92.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +451.3% | -90.0% | +319.2% | -99.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +679.2% | -97.9% | +2688.5% | -99.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.8% | +57.5% | +9.3% | +50.1% | -57.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AZTR and KRYS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AZTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLDB's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRYS currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs QNCX's 2.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.40x | 1.02x | 2.42x | 1.12x | 2.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.40 | $112.00 | $8.87 | $303.00 | $45.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.10 | $40.00 | $2.41 | $122.80 | $0.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.9% | +91.9% | +79.7% | +97.9% | +2.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 73.5 | 44.7 | 64.3 | 41.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.6M | 833K | 1.3M | 264K | 49.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MIRM as "Buy", SLDB as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.8% upside for SLDB (target: $13) vs 12.2% for KRYS (target: $333).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $120.40 | $12.50 | $332.75 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 21 | 17 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KRYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MIRM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
AZTR vs MIRM vs SLDB vs KRYS vs QNCX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AZTR or MIRM or SLDB or KRYS or QNCX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MIRM) is the stronger pick with 54. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Azitra, Inc. (AZTR). Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) offers the better valuation at 43. 4x trailing P/E (39. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MIRM) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AZTR or MIRM or SLDB or KRYS or QNCX?
Over the past 5 years, Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MIRM) delivered a total return of +451. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for Azitra, Inc. (AZTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +26. 9% versus AZTR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AZTR or MIRM or SLDB or KRYS or QNCX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Azitra, Inc.
(AZTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Solid Biosciences Inc. 's 2. 42β — meaning SLDB is approximately 501% more volatile than AZTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 102% for Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AZTR or MIRM or SLDB or KRYS or QNCX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MIRM) is pulling ahead at 54. 7% versus -100. 0% for Azitra, Inc. (AZTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Krystal Biotech, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to -532. 3% for Azitra, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AZTR or MIRM or SLDB or KRYS or QNCX?
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 6% net margin versus -4. 5% for Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 52. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus -4. 2% for MIRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRYS leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AZTR or MIRM or SLDB or KRYS or QNCX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLDB: 76.
8% to $12. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — AZTR or MIRM or SLDB or KRYS or QNCX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AZTR or MIRM or SLDB or KRYS or QNCX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Azitra, Inc.
(AZTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40)). Quince Therapeutics, Inc. (QNCX) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AZTR: -100. 0%, QNCX: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AZTR and MIRM and SLDB and KRYS and QNCX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AZTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MIRM is a small-cap high-growth stock; SLDB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; QNCX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.