Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BACK vs XTLB vs NRXP vs ATXI vs AEYE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Software - Application
BACK vs XTLB vs NRXP vs ATXI vs AEYE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $78K | $294K | $85M | $2M | $100M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23K | $451K | $242K | $1M | $40M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-1M | $-38M | $-4M | $-3M |
| Gross Margin | -18.4% | 26.4% | 59.5% | 100.0% | 78.3% |
| Operating Margin | -398.1% | -481.6% | -63.0% | -279.8% | -7.9% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $138K | $631K | $0.00 | $721K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $504K | $371K | $8M | $3M | $5M |
BACK vs XTLB vs NRXP vs ATXI vs AEYE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| XTL Biopharmaceutic… (XTLB) | 100 | 49.8 | -50.2% |
| NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP) | 100 | 2.8 | -97.2% |
| Avenue Therapeutics… (ATXI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 95.5 | -4.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BACK vs XTLB vs NRXP vs ATXI vs AEYE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BACK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 100.0%
- Beta 0.05 vs AEYE's 2.29
- 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
XTLB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.71, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 0.61x
- Beta 1.71, current ratio 0.61x
NRXP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 101.1% revenue growth vs XTLB's -173.2%
ATXI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +150.1% vs XTLB's -50.9%
AEYE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.5%, EPS growth 30.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs XTLB's -87.3%
- -7.6% margin vs BACK's -426.9%
- -9.5% ROA vs BACK's -31.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 101.1% revenue growth vs XTLB's -173.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -7.6% margin vs BACK's -426.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs AEYE's 2.29 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +150.1% vs XTLB's -50.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.5% ROA vs BACK's -31.3% |
BACK vs XTLB vs NRXP vs ATXI vs AEYE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BACK vs XTLB vs NRXP vs ATXI vs AEYE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AEYE leads in 3 of 6 categories
XTLB leads 1 • BACK leads 0 • NRXP leads 0 • ATXI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEYE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEYE is the larger business by revenue, generating $40M annually — 1774.0x BACK's $22,723. AEYE is the more profitable business, keeping -7.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BACK's -426.9%. On growth, AEYE holds the edge at +7.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22,723 | $451,000 | $242,000 | $1M | $40M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$1M | -$31M | -$4M | -$504,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$1M | -$38M | -$4M | -$3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $0 | -$12M | -$2M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | +26.4% | +59.5% | +100.0% | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -398.1% | -4.8% | -63.0% | -2.8% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -426.9% | -2.3% | -157.3% | -2.7% | -7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -215.1% | -3.7% | -49.0% | -124.1% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -62.3% | — | — | — | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.3% | +20.0% | -80.0% | +89.1% | +29.0% |
Valuation Metrics
XTLB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $77,541 | $293,767 | $85M | $2M | $100M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$426,648 | $60,767 | $78M | -$842,479 | $96M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -0.28x | -2.28x | -0.61x | -32.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 0.65x | 69.15x | — | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.05x | — | 3.84x | 20.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AEYE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XTLB delivers a -25.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-26 in annual profit, vs $-161 for ATXI. XTLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEYE's 0.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRXP scores 5/9 vs BACK's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -25.5% | — | -160.6% | -47.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.3% | -17.7% | -4.9% | -105.8% | -9.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -54.1% | — | — | -42.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -50.7% | — | -9.0% | -17.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x | — | — | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$504,189 | -$233,000 | -$7M | -$3M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $504,189 | $371,000 | $8M | $3M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $138,000 | $631,000 | $0 | $721,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -28.20x | -13.31x | -24.18x | — | -2.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEYE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEYE five years ago would be worth $3,977 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for ATXI. Over the past 12 months, ATXI leads with a +150.1% total return vs XTLB's -50.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEYE at 6.4% vs ATXI's -80.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -69.7% | +11.3% | +16.8% | -19.8% | -18.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.4% | -50.9% | +55.3% | +150.1% | -27.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -45.7% | -50.6% | -99.3% | +20.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -80.4% | -99.1% | -100.0% | -60.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -87.3% | -96.8% | -100.0% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.2% | -18.4% | -21.0% | -80.7% | +6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NRXP and ATXI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATXI is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NRXP currently trades 79.7% from its 52-week high vs BACK's 18.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | 1.71x | 1.91x | -0.11x | 2.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.21 | $10.28 | $3.84 | $0.97 | $16.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.03 | $1.05 | $1.62 | $0.15 | $5.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.2% | +26.0% | +79.7% | +56.7% | +49.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.2 | 57.0 | 64.7 | 54.6 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 2.4M | 913K | 3K | 194K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
BACK is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AEYE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XTLB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BACK vs XTLB vs NRXP vs ATXI vs AEYE: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BACK or XTLB or NRXP or ATXI or AEYE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) is the stronger pick with 14. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 6% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BACK or XTLB or NRXP or ATXI or AEYE?
Over the past 5 years, AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) delivered a total return of -60. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Avenue Therapeutics, Inc. (ATXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +102. 2% versus ATXI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BACK or XTLB or NRXP or ATXI or AEYE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avenue Therapeutics, Inc.
(ATXI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately -2182% more volatile than ATXI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (XTLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 15% for AudioEye, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BACK or XTLB or NRXP or ATXI or AEYE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) is pulling ahead at 14. 5% versus -98. 6% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. (BACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Avenue Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 98. 8% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for IMAC Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEYE leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BACK or XTLB or NRXP or ATXI or AEYE?
AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) is the more profitable company, earning -7. 6% net margin versus -125. 5% for IMAC Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEYE leads at -7. 9% versus -78. 0% for BACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATXI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BACK or XTLB or NRXP or ATXI or AEYE?
In this comparison, BACK (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. XTLB, NRXP, ATXI, AEYE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BACK or XTLB or NRXP or ATXI or AEYE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IMAC Holdings, Inc.
(BACK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 100. 0% yield). NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BACK: -100. 0%, NRXP: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BACK and XTLB and NRXP and ATXI and AEYE?
These companies operate in different sectors (BACK (Healthcare) and XTLB (Healthcare) and NRXP (Healthcare) and ATXI (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; XTLB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATXI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BACK pays a dividend while XTLB, NRXP, ATXI, AEYE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.