Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BAOS vs JMIA vs SE vs MELI vs AMZN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BAOS
Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$4M
5Y Perf.-92.0%
JMIA
Jumia Technologies AG

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • DE
Market Cap$539M
5Y Perf.-80.4%
SE
Sea Limited

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • SG
Market Cap$53.62B
5Y Perf.-62.4%
MELI
MercadoLibre, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • UY
Market Cap$94.80B
5Y Perf.+14.2%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+75.3%

BAOS vs JMIA vs SE vs MELI vs AMZN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BAOS logoBAOS
JMIA logoJMIA
SE logoSE
MELI logoMELI
AMZN logoAMZN
IndustryAdvertising AgenciesSpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$4M$539M$53.62B$94.80B$2.92T
Revenue (TTM)$359K$189M$21.04B$28.89B$742.78B
Net Income (TTM)$-33M$-62M$1.43B$2.00B$90.80B
Gross Margin-89.3%52.8%44.9%44.5%50.6%
Operating Margin-91.5%-33.9%8.2%11.1%11.5%
Forward P/E25.1x39.2x34.8x
Total Debt$685K$12M$4.12B$11.39B$152.99B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$77M$2.41B$3.67B$86.81B

BAOS vs JMIA vs SE vs MELI vs AMZNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BAOS
JMIA
SE
MELI
AMZN
StockFeb 21May 26Return
Baosheng Media Grou… (BAOS)1008.0-92.0%
Jumia Technologies … (JMIA)10019.6-80.4%
Sea Limited (SE)10037.6-62.4%
MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI)100114.2+14.2%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100175.3+75.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BAOS vs JMIA vs SE vs MELI vs AMZN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MELI and AMZN are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Amazon.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. JMIA and SE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BAOS
Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited
The Defensive Pick

BAOS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 1.98x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
JMIA
Jumia Technologies AG
The Momentum Pick

JMIA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +262.5% vs SE's -37.8%
Best for: momentum
SE
Sea Limited
The Growth Play

SE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 28.8%, EPS growth 192.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
  • Lower P/E (25.1x vs 34.8x)
Best for: growth exposure
MELI
MercadoLibre, Inc.
The Income Pick

MELI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.20
  • 13.7% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
  • Beta 1.20, current ratio 1.17x
  • 39.1% revenue growth vs BAOS's -32.3%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 12.2% margin vs BAOS's -91.7%
  • 11.5% ROA vs BAOS's -163.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs -72.5%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMELI logoMELI39.1% revenue growth vs BAOS's -32.3%
ValueSE logoSELower P/E (25.1x vs 34.8x)
Quality / MarginsAMZN logoAMZN12.2% margin vs BAOS's -91.7%
Stability / SafetyMELI logoMELIBeta 1.20 vs JMIA's 2.89
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)JMIA logoJMIA+262.5% vs SE's -37.8%
Efficiency (ROA)AMZN logoAMZN11.5% ROA vs BAOS's -163.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs -72.5%

BAOS vs JMIA vs SE vs MELI vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BAOSBaosheng Media Group Holdings Limited
FY 2024
Rebates and incentives offered by publishers
64.5%$402,462
Net fees from advertisers
35.5%$221,625
JMIAJumia Technologies AG
FY 2025
Sales of goods
87.5%$95M
Marketing And Advertising
7.0%$8M
Value added services
3.9%$4M
Other revenue
1.6%$2M
SESea Limited
FY 2024
Service
90.7%$15.3B
Product
9.3%$1.6B
MELIMercadoLibre, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
87.5%$25.3B
Product
12.5%$3.6B
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B

BAOS vs JMIA vs SE vs MELI vs AMZN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJMIALAGGINGSE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 2071784.0x BAOS's $358,520. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BAOS's -91.7%. On growth, BAOS holds the edge at +5.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBAOS logoBAOSBaosheng Media Gr…JMIA logoJMIAJumia Technologie…SE logoSESea LimitedMELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$358,520$189M$21.0B$28.9B$742.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$32M-$56M$2.0B$4.0B$155.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$33M-$62M$1.4B$2.0B$90.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M-$53M$3.9B$10.1B-$2.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-89.3%+52.8%+44.9%+44.5%+50.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-91.5%-33.9%+8.2%+11.1%+11.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-91.7%-32.6%+6.8%+6.9%+12.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.2%-27.8%+18.5%+35.0%-0.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.1%+34.3%+38.3%+44.6%+16.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-140.7%+46.9%+126.9%-12.5%+74.8%
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JMIA leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 37.8x trailing earnings, AMZN trades at a 69% valuation discount to SE's 121.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMZN's 20.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SE's 52.6x.

MetricBAOS logoBAOSBaosheng Media Gr…JMIA logoJMIAJumia Technologie…SE logoSESea LimitedMELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$4M$539M$53.6B$94.8B$2.92T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3M$474M$55.3B$102.5B$2.98T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.16x-8.53x121.47x47.47x37.82x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.06x39.21x34.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.35x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple52.61x27.18x20.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.81x2.85x3.19x3.28x4.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.29x20.70x6.32x14.05x7.14x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.14x8.80x378.98x
JMIA leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MELI leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

MELI delivers a 33.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-3 for BAOS. BAOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MELI's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SE scores 7/9 vs JMIA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBAOS logoBAOSBaosheng Media Gr…JMIA logoJMIAJumia Technologie…SE logoSESea LimitedMELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.0%-135.2%+15.2%+33.7%+23.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-163.4%-40.1%+5.8%+5.7%+11.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-72.5%-33.0%+5.4%+20.8%+14.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-93.5%-97.8%+6.0%+28.3%+15.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944756
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.46x0.49x1.69x0.37x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$795,531-$65M$1.7B$7.7B$66.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$77M$2.4B$3.7B$86.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$684,997$12M$4.1B$11.4B$153.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-180.82x-8.73x49.70x17.53x39.96x
MELI leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JMIA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,293 for BAOS. Over the past 12 months, JMIA leads with a +262.5% total return vs SE's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JMIA at 44.1% vs BAOS's -29.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBAOS logoBAOSBaosheng Media Gr…JMIA logoJMIAJumia Technologie…SE logoSESea LimitedMELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.9%-32.2%-32.6%-5.3%+19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+45.0%+262.5%-37.8%-17.3%+43.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-65.0%+199.0%+5.1%+45.6%+156.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.1%-67.4%-63.1%+26.2%+64.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-94.8%-65.8%+455.5%+1370.4%+697.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-29.5%+44.1%+1.7%+13.3%+36.8%
JMIA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MELI and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MELI is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JMIA's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs BAOS's 33.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBAOS logoBAOSBaosheng Media Gr…JMIA logoJMIAJumia Technologie…SE logoSESea LimitedMELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.73x2.89x1.45x1.20x1.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.30$14.72$199.30$2645.22$278.56
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.91$2.13$77.05$1593.21$185.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+33.4%+59.1%+44.5%+70.7%+97.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.054.057.154.881.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded16K2.0M4.8M472K45.5M
Evenly matched — MELI and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: JMIA as "Buy", SE as "Buy", MELI as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.2% upside for JMIA (target: $17) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).

MetricBAOS logoBAOSBaosheng Media Gr…JMIA logoJMIAJumia Technologie…SE logoSESea LimitedMELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.33$147.67$2420.00$306.77
# AnalystsCovering analysts7443394
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JMIA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). AMZN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallJumia Technologies AG (JMIA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BAOS vs JMIA vs SE vs MELI vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BAOS or JMIA or SE or MELI or AMZN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.

(MELI) is the stronger pick with 39. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 3% for Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BAOS or JMIA or SE or MELI or AMZN?

On trailing P/E, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the cheapest at 37. 8x versus Sea Limited at 121. 5x. On forward P/E, Sea Limited is actually cheaper at 25. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BAOS or JMIA or SE or MELI or AMZN?

Over the past 5 years, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -87. 1% for Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MELI returned +1370% versus BAOS's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BAOS or JMIA or SE or MELI or AMZN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MercadoLibre, Inc.

(MELI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Jumia Technologies AG's 2. 89β — meaning JMIA is approximately 140% more volatile than MELI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 169% for MercadoLibre, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BAOS or JMIA or SE or MELI or AMZN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MercadoLibre, Inc.

(MELI) is pulling ahead at 39. 1% versus -32. 3% for Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sea Limited grew EPS 192. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1359. 2% for Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MELI leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BAOS or JMIA or SE or MELI or AMZN?

Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -43. 1% for Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -42. 9% for BAOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JMIA leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BAOS or JMIA or SE or MELI or AMZN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Sea Limited (SE) trades at 25.

1x forward P/E versus 39. 2x for MercadoLibre, Inc. — 14. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JMIA: 99. 2% to $17. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BAOS or JMIA or SE or MELI or AMZN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is BAOS or JMIA or SE or MELI or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.

(MELI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), +1370% 10Y return). Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) carries a higher beta of 2. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MELI: +1370%, JMIA: -65. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BAOS and JMIA and SE and MELI and AMZN?

These companies operate in different sectors (BAOS (Communication Services) and JMIA (Consumer Cyclical) and SE (Consumer Cyclical) and MELI (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BAOS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JMIA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MELI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BAOS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 256%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JMIA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Gross Margin > 31%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MELI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 22%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BAOS and JMIA and SE and MELI and AMZN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BAOS: 513.0% · JMIA: 34.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.