Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA) vs Formula One Group (FWONK) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BATRA | 10.5% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | FWONK | 43.8% net margin vs BATRA's -3.2% |
| Stability / Safety | BATRA | Beta 0.48 vs FWONK's 0.51 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BATRA | +9.7% vs FWONK's -5.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FWONK | 42.6% ROA vs BATRA's -1.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Atlanta Braves Holdings is a professional sports franchise that owns and operates the Atlanta Braves Major League Baseball team and its surrounding real estate development. The company generates revenue primarily from baseball operations — including ticket sales, media rights, and sponsorships — and from The Battery Atlanta mixed-use development, which includes retail, dining, and entertainment venues. Its key competitive advantage is the unique combination of a historic MLB franchise with a successful real estate ecosystem that creates multiple revenue streams beyond traditional sports operations.
Formula One Group is the commercial rights holder for the global Formula 1 motorsport championship. It generates revenue primarily from race promotion fees (about 30%), media rights sales (about 35%), and sponsorship deals (about 20%), with the remainder from hospitality and other sources. Its key moat is the exclusive, long-term commercial rights to the world's premier motorsport series — a globally recognized brand with high barriers to entry.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FWONK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). BATRA leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
FWONK and BATRA operate at a comparable scale, with $1.0B and $732M in trailing revenue. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BATRA's -3.2%. On growth, BATRA holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… | FWONKFormula One Group |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $732M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | $449M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$120M | $279M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | -18.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | -3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +43.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.4% | +27.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.6% | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -109.7% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… | FWONKFormula One Group |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $20.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $19.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -130.84x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 52.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.07x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.43x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.74x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BATRA scores 4/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… | FWONKFormula One Group |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | +42.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | -0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $726M | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $112M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $837M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.95x | 3.35x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in FWONK five years ago would be worth $20,766 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,198 for BATRA. Over the past 12 months, BATRA leads with a +9.7% total return vs FWONK's -5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BATRA at 12.2% vs FWONK's 11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… | FWONKFormula One Group |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.7% | -6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.7% | -5.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.3% | +39.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.0% | +107.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +143.9% | +269.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.2% | +11.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BATRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWONK's 0.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BATRA currently trades 95.9% from its 52-week high vs FWONK's 83.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… | FWONKFormula One Group |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.50 | $109.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.67 | $75.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.9% | +83.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.4 | 44.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 53K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BATRA as "Buy" and FWONK as "Buy".
| Metric | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… | FWONKFormula One Group |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $119.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | 100 | 168.3 | +68.3% |
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 230.02 | +130.0% |
Formula One Group (FWONK) returned +108% over 5 years vs Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA)'s +62%. A $10,000 investment in FWONK 5 years ago would be worth $20,766 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | $262M | $732M | +179.6% |
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $262M (2016) to $732M (2025) — a 12.1% CAGR. Formula One Group's revenue grew from $0M (2016) to $0M (2025) — a 0.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | -23.7% | -3.2% | +86.5% |
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 14.3% | -0.8% | -105.7% |
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from -24% (2016) to -3% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 3 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2023 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 27.8 | 101.8 | +266.2% |
Formula One Group has traded in a 27x–102x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~102x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | -1.25 | -0.37 | +70.4% |
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 1.02 | 0 | -100.0% |
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-1.25 (2016) to $-0.37 (2025). Formula One Group's EPS grew from $1.02 (2016) to $0.00 (2025) — a -100% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. generated $-120M FCF in 2025 (-544% vs 2021). Formula One Group generated $908M FCF in 2025 (+96% vs 2021).
BATRA vs FWONK: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BATRA or FWONK a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BATRA or FWONK?
Over the past 5 years, Formula One Group (FWONK) delivered a total return of +107.7%, compared to +62.0% for Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA). A $10,000 investment in FWONK five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FWONK returned +269.5% versus BATRA's +143.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BATRA or FWONK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.48β versus Formula One Group's 0.51β — meaning FWONK is approximately 5% more volatile than BATRA relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — BATRA or FWONK?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.8% net margin versus -3.2% for Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BATRA leads at 2.3% versus -3.4% for FWONK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATRA leads at 19.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — BATRA or FWONK?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is BATRA or FWONK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Formula One Group (FWONK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.51), +269.5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FWONK: +269.5%, BATRA: +143.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between BATRA and FWONK?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.