Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BB vs SAIL vs CYBR vs TENB vs VRNS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
BB vs SAIL vs CYBR vs TENB vs VRNS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $3.60B | $6.85B | $20.64B | $2.47B | $3.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $537M | $1.02B | $1.36B | $1.02B | $660M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $-297M | $-147M | $-12M | $-137M |
| Gross Margin | 75.0% | 66.0% | 74.3% | 78.2% | 78.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | -16.4% | -7.7% | 2.9% | -21.9% |
| Forward P/E | 43.1x | — | 81.9x | 11.1x | 242.2x |
| Total Debt | $239M | $1.05B | $1.22B | $466M | $572M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $267M | $121M | $623M | $188M | $202M |
BB vs SAIL vs CYBR vs TENB vs VRNS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlackBerry Limited (BB) | 100 | 129.5 | +29.5% |
| SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
| CyberArk Software L… (CYBR) | 100 | 118.4 | +18.4% |
| Tenable Holdings, I… (TENB) | 100 | 56.5 | -43.5% |
| Varonis Systems, In… (VRNS) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BB vs SAIL vs CYBR vs TENB vs VRNS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 4.1% margin vs SAIL's -29.2%
- +65.8% vs VRNS's -36.7%
- 1.9% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 0.1% vs -11.0%
SAIL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.2%, EPS growth 72.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.1%
CYBR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.92
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs VRNS's 317.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 50.9%, current ratio 2.00x
- Beta 0.92, current ratio 2.00x
TENB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (11.1x vs 242.2x)
Among these 5 stocks, VRNS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.0% revenue growth vs BB's -29.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.1x vs 242.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.1% margin vs SAIL's -29.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs SAIL's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.8% vs VRNS's -36.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.9% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 0.1% vs -11.0% |
BB vs SAIL vs CYBR vs TENB vs VRNS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BB vs SAIL vs CYBR vs TENB vs VRNS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BB leads in 2 of 6 categories
TENB leads 1 • CYBR leads 1 • SAIL leads 0 • VRNS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CYBR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 2.5x BB's $537M. BB is the more profitable business, keeping 4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAIL's -29.2%. On growth, VRNS holds the edge at +26.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $537M | $1.0B | $1.4B | $1.0B | $660M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $38M | $42M | $23M | $72M | -$135M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | -$297M | -$147M | -$12M | -$137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $6M | $259M | $263M | $120M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.0% | +66.0% | +74.3% | +78.2% | +78.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | -16.4% | -7.7% | +2.9% | -21.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | -29.2% | -10.8% | -1.2% | -20.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +0.6% | +19.0% | +25.7% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.8% | +19.8% | +18.5% | +9.6% | +26.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +85.4% | +83.2% | +106.3% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TENB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TENB's 63.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CYBR's 908.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $6.8B | $20.6B | $2.5B | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $7.8B | $21.2B | $2.7B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -46.92x | -6.16x | -139.54x | -71.80x | -25.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 43.11x | — | 81.87x | 11.06x | 242.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 78.54x | 160.20x | 908.21x | 63.60x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.73x | 7.95x | 15.16x | 2.47x | 5.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.04x | — | 8.54x | 7.93x | 6.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 562.72x | — | 79.60x | 9.69x | 24.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BB delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-27 for VRNS. BB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TENB's 1.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BB scores 6/9 vs CYBR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.0% | -8.0% | -6.1% | -3.7% | -27.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | -4.0% | -3.0% | -0.7% | -8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.1% | — | -3.2% | +0.2% | -11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.1% | -2.7% | -3.3% | +0.1% | -14.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | — | 0.51x | 1.43x | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | $926M | $599M | $278M | $369M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $267M | $121M | $623M | $188M | $202M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $239M | $1.0B | $1.2B | $466M | $572M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.33x | -0.91x | — | 1.02x | -9.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CYBR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CYBR five years ago would be worth $34,006 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,541 for SAIL. Over the past 12 months, BB leads with a +65.8% total return vs VRNS's -36.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CYBR at 43.4% vs SAIL's -17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +60.5% | -35.7% | -6.1% | -5.2% | -10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.8% | -33.7% | +13.3% | -31.2% | -36.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.5% | -44.6% | +194.8% | -41.1% | +23.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | -44.6% | +240.1% | -41.9% | -39.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.3% | -44.6% | +901.8% | -28.8% | +317.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.0% | -17.9% | +43.4% | -16.2% | +7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BB and CYBR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CYBR is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAIL's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BB currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs VRNS's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.81x | 0.92x | 1.12x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.24 | $24.95 | $526.19 | $35.69 | $63.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.12 | $10.30 | $347.12 | $15.73 | $19.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +48.9% | +77.7% | +60.4% | +44.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.8 | 43.7 | 38.9 | 60.1 | 66.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.8M | 3.1M | 0 | 3.0M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BB as "Hold", SAIL as "Buy", CYBR as "Buy", TENB as "Buy", VRNS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.4% upside for SAIL (target: $22) vs -27.9% for BB (target: $4).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.40 | $21.50 | $459.00 | $27.94 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 32 | 49 | 28 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.0% | +10.0% | +3.4% |
BB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TENB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BB vs SAIL vs CYBR vs TENB vs VRNS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BB or SAIL or CYBR or TENB or VRNS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is the stronger pick with 36. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 5% for BlackBerry Limited (BB). Analysts rate SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BB or SAIL or CYBR or TENB or VRNS?
Over the past 5 years, CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) delivered a total return of +240. 1%, compared to -44. 6% for SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CYBR returned +901. 8% versus SAIL's -44. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BB or SAIL or CYBR or TENB or VRNS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus SailPoint, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning SAIL is approximately 97% more volatile than CYBR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BlackBerry Limited (BB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 143% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BB or SAIL or CYBR or TENB or VRNS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is pulling ahead at 36. 0% versus -29. 5% for BlackBerry Limited (BB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SailPoint, Inc. grew EPS 72. 0% year-over-year, compared to -38. 2% for CyberArk Software Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SAIL leads at 33. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BB or SAIL or CYBR or TENB or VRNS?
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) is the more profitable company, earning -3. 6% net margin versus -36. 7% for SailPoint, Inc. — meaning it keeps -3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BB leads at 0. 1% versus -23. 5% for VRNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRNS leads at 79. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BB or SAIL or CYBR or TENB or VRNS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) trades at 11. 1x forward P/E versus 242. 2x for Varonis Systems, Inc. — 231. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAIL: 76. 4% to $21. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — BB or SAIL or CYBR or TENB or VRNS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BB or SAIL or CYBR or TENB or VRNS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), +901. 8% 10Y return). SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CYBR: +901. 8%, SAIL: -44. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BB and SAIL and CYBR and TENB and VRNS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAIL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CYBR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TENB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.