Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $5M | $203M | $548M | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $116M | $389M | $674M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-11M | $31M | $-173M |
| Gross Margin | -74.6% | 58.6% | 81.0% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | -137.9% | -10.5% | 10.2% | -27.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 295.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $951K | $24M | $23M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $57M | $166M | $103M |
BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Anika Therapeutics,… (ANIK) | 100 | 45.2 | -54.8% |
| MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) | 100 | 102.8 | +2.8% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCDA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.14
- Beta 1.14 vs NVCR's 2.20
ANIK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 4.72x
- Beta 1.14, current ratio 4.72x
- +4.5% vs BCDA's -58.9%
MDXG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 14.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.1%
- -48.5% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 30.3%
- 20.0% revenue growth vs BCDA's -87.8%
- Better valuation composite
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs BCDA's -87.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.9% margin vs BCDA's -137.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs NVCR's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.5% vs BCDA's -58.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs BCDA's -138.9% |
BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MDXG leads in 3 of 6 categories
BCDA leads 0 • ANIK leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDXG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVCR and BCDA operate at a comparable scale, with $674M and $0 in trailing revenue. MDXG is the more profitable business, keeping 7.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BCDA's -137.0%. On growth, ANIK holds the edge at +13.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $116M | $389M | $674M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$7M | $53M | -$165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$11M | $31M | -$173M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $1M | $66M | -$48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -74.6% | +58.6% | +81.0% | +75.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -137.9% | -10.5% | +10.2% | -27.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -137.0% | -9.5% | +7.9% | -25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -138.5% | +0.9% | +17.0% | -7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +13.2% | -33.1% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -386.3% | -8.8% | -2.4% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ANIK and MDXG each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $203M | $548M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $170M | $405M | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.38x | -19.92x | 11.53x | -13.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 295.20x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 5.14x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 86.47x | 1.80x | 1.31x | 2.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.57x | 1.51x | 2.15x | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 46.51x | 7.51x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MDXG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MDXG delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-3 for BCDA. MDXG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCDA's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ANIK scores 6/9 vs BCDA's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -7.7% | +12.9% | -50.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -138.9% | -5.9% | +9.7% | -16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -7.1% | +42.3% | -16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.5% | -6.4% | +25.7% | -28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.14x | 0.17x | 0.09x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$33M | -$144M | $187M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $57M | $166M | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $951,000 | $24M | $23M | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 25.32x | -96.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MDXG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDXG five years ago would be worth $3,712 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $70 for BCDA. Over the past 12 months, ANIK leads with a +4.5% total return vs BCDA's -58.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDXG at -14.1% vs BCDA's -77.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.2% | +61.9% | -43.1% | +28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.9% | +4.5% | -47.1% | +1.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -41.7% | -36.6% | -75.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -63.9% | -62.9% | -91.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -65.9% | -48.5% | +30.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -77.2% | -16.5% | -14.1% | -37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BCDA and ANIK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BCDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ANIK currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs BCDA's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 1.14x | 1.22x | 2.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.92 | $16.24 | $7.99 | $20.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $7.87 | $3.02 | $9.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.3% | +93.2% | +46.2% | +83.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 53.3 | 49.3 | 69.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 135K | 1.4M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ANIK as "Buy", MDXG as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 171.0% upside for MDXG (target: $10) vs 99.0% for NVCR (target: $34).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $10.00 | $33.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 15 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.7% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
MDXG leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -87. 8% for BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA). MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (295. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (ANIK) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR?
Over the past 5 years, MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) delivered a total return of -62. 9%, compared to -99. 3% for BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVCR returned +30. 3% versus BCDA's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioCardia, Inc.
(BCDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 14β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 93% more volatile than BCDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 114% for BioCardia, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -87. 8% for BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Anika Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 80. 2% year-over-year, compared to 14. 3% for MiMedx Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDXG leads at 16. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR?
MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 6% net margin versus -137. 0% for BioCardia, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDXG leads at 15. 3% versus -137. 9% for BCDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDXG leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MDXG: 171.
0% to $10. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Anika Therapeutics, Inc.
(ANIK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 14)). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ANIK: -65. 9%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BCDA and ANIK and MDXG and NVCR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ANIK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDXG is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.