Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BCML vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
BCML vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $333M | $88.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $142M | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 68.4% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 23.2% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $837M |
BCML vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BayCom Corp (BCML) | 100 | 231.3 | +131.3% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 160.6 | +60.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCML vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCML is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, Low D/E 6.6%, current ratio 55.06x
- PEG 0.82 vs ICE's 2.19
- Beta 0.62, yield 2.0%, current ratio 55.06x
ICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
- 225.3% 10Y total return vs BCML's 176.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% NII/revenue growth vs BCML's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 19.5x), PEG 0.82 vs 2.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCML's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs BCML's 0.62 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.7% vs ICE's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCML's 0.5% |
BCML vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BCML vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 89.1x BCML's $142M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BCML's 16.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $142M | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $45M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.4% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BCML leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, BCML trades at a 48% valuation discount to ICE's 27.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCML offers better value at 1.02x vs ICE's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $333M | $88.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $328M | $107.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.98x | 27.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.18x | 19.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.02x | 3.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.10x | 16.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.34x | 7.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.51x | 20.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for BCML. BCML carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs BCML's 8/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.2% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.4% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.80x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BCML leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BCML five years ago would be worth $18,341 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,335 for ICE. Over the past 12 months, BCML leads with a +19.7% total return vs ICE's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCML at 28.4% vs ICE's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.8% | -2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.7% | -10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.9% | +50.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.4% | +43.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +176.6% | +225.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.4% | +14.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BCML and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCML's 0.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BCML currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 82.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.15 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.84 | $143.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +82.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 38.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36K | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BCML and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BCML as "Buy" and ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for ICE (target: $196) vs 11.5% for BCML (target: $34). For income investors, BCML offers the higher dividend yield at 1.99% vs ICE's 1.24%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $195.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +1.6% |
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BCML leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
BCML vs ICE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCML or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger pick with 7. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for BayCom Corp (BCML). BayCom Corp (BCML) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BayCom Corp (BCML) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCML or ICE?
On trailing P/E, BayCom Corp (BCML) is the cheapest at 14.
0x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, BayCom Corp is actually cheaper at 11. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: BayCom Corp wins at 0. 82x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCML or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, BayCom Corp (BCML) delivered a total return of +83.
4%, compared to +43. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +225. 3% versus BCML's +176. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCML or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus BayCom Corp's 0. 62β — meaning BCML is approximately 90% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BayCom Corp (BCML) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCML or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is pulling ahead at 7. 5% versus 3. 0% for BayCom Corp (BCML). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to 3. 8% for BayCom Corp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCML or ICE?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 16. 9% for BayCom Corp — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 23. 2% for BCML. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCML leads at 68. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCML or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, BayCom Corp (BCML) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, BayCom Corp (BCML) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 25. 3% to $195. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCML or ICE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BayCom Corp (BCML) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 2% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).
09Is BCML or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 2% yield, +225. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +225. 3%, BCML: +176. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCML and ICE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCML is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.