Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BCS vs DB vs UBS vs HSBC vs LYG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
BCS vs DB vs UBS vs HSBC vs LYG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $79.93B | $60.21B | $137.82B | $305.76B | $77.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26.82B | $60.86B | $59.05B | $147.86B | $65.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7.05B | $6.93B | $6.27B | $22.29B | $4.66B |
| Gross Margin | 108.6% | 49.9% | 63.6% | 54.6% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | 37.3% | 16.0% | 11.9% | 20.3% | 10.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 9.3x | 13.6x | 10.7x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $219.94B | $254.81B | $356.12B | $495.79B | $95.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $229.75B | $171.62B | $209.86B | $286.92B | $56.66B |
BCS vs DB vs UBS vs HSBC vs LYG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barclays PLC (BCS) | 100 | 411.5 | +311.5% |
| Deutsche Bank AG (DB) | 100 | 374.6 | +274.6% |
| UBS Group AG (UBS) | 100 | 415.0 | +315.0% |
| HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) | 100 | 386.0 | +286.0% |
| Lloyds Banking Grou… (LYG) | 100 | 374.1 | +274.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCS vs DB vs UBS vs HSBC vs LYG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.08 vs UBS's 12.29
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 12.6x), PEG 0.08 vs 0.31
Among these 5 stocks, UBS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HSBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 3.7%
- 264.7% 10Y total return vs UBS's 232.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 2.62x
- Beta 1.12, yield 3.7%, current ratio 2.62x
LYG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 72.8%, EPS growth 8.0%
- NIM 1.4% vs UBS's 0.4%
- 72.8% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 72.8% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 12.6x), PEG 0.08 vs 0.31 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs DB's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, vs BCS's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.7% vs DB's +20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% |
BCS vs DB vs UBS vs HSBC vs LYG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HSBC leads in 2 of 6 categories
BCS leads 1 • DB leads 1 • UBS leads 0 • LYG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.9B annually — 5.5x BCS's $26.8B. BCS is the more profitable business, keeping 26.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LYG's 7.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.8B | $60.9B | $59.1B | $147.9B | $65.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.0B | $9.7B | $9.9B | $35.8B | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.1B | $6.9B | $6.3B | $22.3B | $4.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 | $3.9B | $0 | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +108.6% | +49.9% | +63.6% | +54.6% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | +16.0% | +11.9% | +20.3% | +10.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +11.4% | +10.4% | +15.1% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -30.1% | — | -26.4% | +17.0% | -1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.0% | +3.3% | +26.1% | +23.5% | +141.8% |
Valuation Metrics
DB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, DB trades at a 64% valuation discount to UBS's 23.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DB offers better value at 0.08x vs UBS's 21.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $79.9B | $60.2B | $137.8B | $305.8B | $77.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $66.6B | $158.0B | $284.1B | $514.6B | $129.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.44x | 8.67x | 23.75x | 14.71x | 14.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.90x | 9.35x | 13.59x | 10.75x | 12.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | 0.08x | 21.49x | 0.33x | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.66x | 13.83x | 29.75x | 16.11x | 14.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.19x | 0.84x | 2.33x | 2.07x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 0.67x | 1.62x | 1.69x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 12.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HSBC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSBC delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for UBS. LYG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.99x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UBS's 3.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBS scores 6/9 vs BCS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | +8.7% | +7.0% | +11.4% | +9.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +0.5% | +0.4% | +0.7% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +2.6% | +1.2% | +4.0% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.2% | +1.9% | +1.1% | +1.4% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.81x | 3.18x | 3.94x | 2.68x | 1.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9.8B | $83.2B | $146.3B | $208.9B | $38.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $229.8B | $171.6B | $209.9B | $286.9B | $56.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $219.9B | $254.8B | $356.1B | $495.8B | $95.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.42x | 0.34x | 0.33x | 0.47x | 0.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSBC five years ago would be worth $32,570 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,158 for LYG. Over the past 12 months, HSBC leads with a +64.7% total return vs DB's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCS at 46.5% vs UBS's 33.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.4% | -20.5% | -3.4% | +13.4% | +0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.0% | +20.9% | +47.4% | +64.7% | +41.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +214.4% | +210.4% | +139.5% | +162.1% | +150.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.3% | +135.3% | +204.7% | +225.7% | +131.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +187.7% | +101.7% | +232.0% | +264.7% | +77.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.5% | +45.9% | +33.8% | +37.9% | +35.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HSBC and LYG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYG is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DB's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSBC currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs DB's 77.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 1.48x | 1.17x | 1.12x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.70 | $40.43 | $49.36 | $94.80 | $6.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.88 | $26.59 | $30.36 | $56.21 | $3.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +77.8% | +90.0% | +93.9% | +83.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 52.5 | 68.0 | 57.3 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.2M | 3.5M | 2.7M | 2.0M | 20.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BCS and HSBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BCS as "Buy", DB as "Hold", UBS as "Buy", HSBC as "Hold", LYG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.9% upside for BCS (target: $44) vs -52.7% for DB (target: $15). For income investors, HSBC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.71% vs UBS's 1.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.00 | $14.87 | $23.57 | $52.00 | $2.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 33 | 29 | 19 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | — | +1.6% | +3.7% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | — | $0.72 | $3.30 | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.4% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +4.1% | +2.9% |
HSBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BCS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
BCS vs DB vs UBS vs HSBC vs LYG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCS or DB or UBS or HSBC or LYG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is the stronger pick with 72.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). Deutsche Bank AG (DB) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Barclays PLC (BCS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCS or DB or UBS or HSBC or LYG?
On trailing P/E, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is the cheapest at 8.
7x versus UBS Group AG at 23. 7x. On forward P/E, Deutsche Bank AG is actually cheaper at 9. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Deutsche Bank AG wins at 0. 08x versus UBS Group AG's 12. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCS or DB or UBS or HSBC or LYG?
Over the past 5 years, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) delivered a total return of +225.
7%, compared to +131. 6% for Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSBC returned +264. 7% versus LYG's +77. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCS or DB or UBS or HSBC or LYG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
05β versus Deutsche Bank AG's 1. 48β — meaning DB is approximately 40% more volatile than LYG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 199% versus 4% for UBS Group AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCS or DB or UBS or HSBC or LYG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is pulling ahead at 72.
8% versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Deutsche Bank AG grew EPS 125. 5% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for HSBC Holdings plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCS or DB or UBS or HSBC or LYG?
Barclays PLC (BCS) is the more profitable company, earning 26.
7% net margin versus 7. 2% for Lloyds Banking Group plc — meaning it keeps 26. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCS leads at 37. 3% versus 10. 2% for LYG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCS leads at 108. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCS or DB or UBS or HSBC or LYG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 08x versus UBS Group AG's 12. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 13. 6x for UBS Group AG — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCS: 88. 9% to $44. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCS or DB or UBS or HSBC or LYG?
In this comparison, HSBC (3.
7% yield), BCS (3. 5% yield), LYG (3. 4% yield), UBS (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. DB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BCS or DB or UBS or HSBC or LYG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 3. 7% yield, +264. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSBC: +264. 7%, DB: +101. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCS and DB and UBS and HSBC and LYG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DB is a mid-cap deep-value stock; UBS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HSBC is a large-cap deep-value stock; LYG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. BCS, UBS, HSBC, LYG pay a dividend while DB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.