Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BEDU vs GOTU vs EDU vs TAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
BEDU vs GOTU vs EDU vs TAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $17M | $760M | $8.97B | $771M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.12B | $5.85B | $4.99B | $2.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.02B | $-374M | $367M | $171M |
| Gross Margin | 24.3% | 67.5% | 55.1% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | -87.6% | -9.1% | 9.0% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 16.2x | 18.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.51B | $492M | $804M | $333M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $493M | $1.32B | $1.61B | $1.77B |
BEDU vs GOTU vs EDU vs TAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bright Scholar Educ… (BEDU) | 100 | 7.7 | -92.3% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 7.5 | -92.5% |
| New Oriental Educat… (EDU) | 100 | 42.6 | -57.4% |
| TAL Education Group (TAL) | 100 | 19.5 | -80.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BEDU vs GOTU vs EDU vs TAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BEDU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +39.8% vs GOTU's -39.4%
GOTU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 56.0% revenue growth vs BEDU's -17.4%
EDU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 1.1%
- 47.3% 10Y total return vs TAL's 27.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 20.3%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.82, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.58x
TAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 51.2%, EPS growth 24.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -20.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.0% revenue growth vs BEDU's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 18.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.4% margin vs BEDU's -90.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs BEDU's 1.24, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.8% vs GOTU's -39.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs BEDU's -326.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs -27.8% |
BEDU vs GOTU vs EDU vs TAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BEDU vs GOTU vs EDU vs TAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EDU leads in 2 of 6 categories
BEDU leads 1 • TAL leads 1 • GOTU leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BEDU and EDU each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 5.2x BEDU's $1.1B. EDU is the more profitable business, keeping 7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEDU's -90.9%. On growth, TAL holds the edge at +38.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $5.8B | $5.0B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$924M | -$378M | $563M | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.0B | -$374M | $367M | $171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $193M | $0 | $737M | $441M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +67.5% | +55.1% | +54.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -87.6% | -9.1% | +9.0% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -90.9% | -6.4% | +7.4% | +6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +1.7% | +14.8% | +16.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -91.6% | +32.9% | +6.1% | +38.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.0% | +66.7% | 0.0% | -21.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BEDU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, TAL trades at a 63% valuation discount to EDU's 24.5x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $760M | $9.0B | $771M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $638M | $8.2B | -$667M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | -4.86x | 24.50x | 9.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 16.25x | 18.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 15.25x | -16.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 1.12x | 1.83x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 2.67x | 2.31x | 0.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.22x | 64.81x | 14.07x | 2.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EDU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EDU delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-14 for BEDU. TAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BEDU's 2.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EDU scores 7/9 vs GOTU's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.0% | -21.8% | +9.1% | +4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | -6.8% | +4.8% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.8% | -47.8% | +9.9% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.7% | -39.9% | +9.5% | -0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.49x | 0.25x | 0.20x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | -$829M | -$809M | -$1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $493M | $1.3B | $1.6B | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $492M | $804M | $333M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 547.21x | — | 1570.90x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TAL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EDU five years ago would be worth $3,854 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $762 for GOTU. Over the past 12 months, BEDU leads with a +39.8% total return vs GOTU's -39.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TAL at 26.7% vs GOTU's -12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -19.3% | -2.5% | -0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.8% | -39.4% | +19.4% | +23.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.3% | -32.3% | +37.2% | +103.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -92.4% | -61.5% | -79.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.3% | -81.2% | +47.3% | +27.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.5% | -12.2% | +11.1% | +26.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BEDU and EDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EDU is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEDU's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEDU currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs GOTU's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 0.99x | 0.82x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.28 | $4.56 | $64.97 | $13.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.50 | $1.84 | $41.62 | $9.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +43.2% | +86.7% | +85.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 52.7 | 54.8 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 395K | 689K | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
EDU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOTU as "Hold", EDU as "Buy", TAL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 57.9% upside for TAL (target: $18) vs 20.7% for EDU (target: $68). EDU is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.94 | $68.00 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 24 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.61 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% | +5.0% | +1.7% |
EDU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). BEDU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BEDU vs GOTU vs EDU vs TAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BEDU or GOTU or EDU or TAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 56. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited (BEDU). TAL Education Group (TAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BEDU or GOTU or EDU or TAL?
On trailing P/E, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the cheapest at 9.
0x versus New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BEDU or GOTU or EDU or TAL?
Over the past 5 years, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) delivered a total return of -61. 5%, compared to -92. 4% for Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EDU returned +47. 3% versus BEDU's -93. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BEDU or GOTU or EDU or TAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited's 1. 24β — meaning BEDU is approximately 51% more volatile than EDU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TAL Education Group (TAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 2% for Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BEDU or GOTU or EDU or TAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 56. 0% versus -17. 4% for Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited (BEDU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAL Education Group grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EDU leads at 16. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BEDU or GOTU or EDU or TAL?
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus -56. 8% for Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EDU leads at 8. 7% versus -46. 7% for BEDU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOTU leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BEDU or GOTU or EDU or TAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) trades at 16. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 1x for TAL Education Group — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TAL: 57. 9% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BEDU or GOTU or EDU or TAL?
In this comparison, EDU (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. BEDU, GOTU, TAL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BEDU or GOTU or EDU or TAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EDU: +47. 3%, BEDU: -93. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BEDU and GOTU and EDU and TAL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BEDU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAL is a small-cap high-growth stock. EDU pays a dividend while BEDU, GOTU, TAL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.