BFS
Saul Centers, Inc.
REIT - Retail
Market Cap$862M
5Y Perf.+15.8%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BFS vs UE vs KIM vs RPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
UE
Urban Edge Properties
REIT - Diversified
Market Cap$2.72B
5Y Perf.+121.6%
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
REIT - Retail
Market Cap$15.84B
5Y Perf.+111.4%
RPT
Rithm Property Trust Inc.
REIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$113M
5Y Perf.+82.4%
BFS vs UE vs KIM vs RPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BFS | UE | KIM | RPT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $862M | $2.72B | $15.84B | $113M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $296M | $486M | $2.16B | $40M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $108M | $616M | $1M |
| Gross Margin | 74.7% | 25.3% | 54.7% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | 43.3% | 29.0% | 36.1% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 61.7x | 44.0x | 30.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.60B | $1.67B | $8.64B | $742M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $49M | $213M | $79M |
BFS vs UE vs KIM vs RPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BFS
UE
KIM
RPT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) | 100 | 115.8 | +15.8% |
| Urban Edge Properti… (UE) | 100 | 221.6 | +121.6% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 100 | 211.4 | +111.4% |
| Rithm Property Trus… (RPT) | 100 | 182.4 | +82.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BFS vs UE vs KIM vs RPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: UE and KIM are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Kimco Realty Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. RPT and BFS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BFS
Saul Centers, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
BFS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 6.7%
- Beta 0.31, yield 6.7%, current ratio 0.34x
- Beta 0.31 vs RPT's 0.61
Best for: income & stability and defensive
UE
Urban Edge Properties
The Real Estate Income Play
UE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 2.54x
- 3.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs RPT's 9.7%
- 3.2% ROA vs RPT's 0.1%, ROIC 3.2% vs 3.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play
KIM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 28.5% margin vs RPT's 3.7%
Best for: value and quality
RPT
Rithm Property Trust Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
RPT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth 97.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -37.6%
- 424.1% 10Y total return vs KIM's 11.0%
- 11.8% FFO/revenue growth vs KIM's 5.1%
- +481.6% vs BFS's +14.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RPT | 11.8% FFO/revenue growth vs KIM's 5.1% |
| Value | KIM | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | KIM | 28.5% margin vs RPT's 3.7% |
| Stability / Safety | BFS | Beta 0.31 vs RPT's 0.61 |
| Dividends | UE | 3.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs RPT's 9.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | RPT | +481.6% vs BFS's +14.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | UE | 3.2% ROA vs RPT's 0.1%, ROIC 3.2% vs 3.1% |
BFS vs UE vs KIM vs RPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2023
FY 2025
FY 2018
FY 2022
BFS vs UE vs KIM vs RPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLRPTLAGGINGKIM
Who Leads Where
RPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
BFS leads 1 • UE leads 0 • KIM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓KIMKimco Realty Corporat…
0leads
UEUrban Edge Properties
0leads
BFSSaul Centers, Inc.
1leads
RPTRithm Property Trust …
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BFSvs UEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
RPT3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
RPT5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
BFS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BFS and UE and KIM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 54.1x RPT's $40M. KIM is the more profitable business, keeping 28.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RPT's 3.7%. On growth, UE holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BFSSaul Centers, Inc. | UEUrban Edge Proper… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | RPTRithm Property Tr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $296M | $486M | $2.2B | $40M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $188M | $276M | $1.4B | $19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | $108M | $616M | $1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $99M | $189M | $844M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.7% | +25.3% | +54.7% | +65.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +43.3% | +29.0% | +36.1% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +22.2% | +28.5% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.3% | +38.9% | +39.0% | -15.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | +12.2% | +4.0% | -5.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.3% | +157.1% | +27.8% | -27.8% |
Evenly matched — BFS and UE and KIM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
RPT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, BFS trades at a 22% valuation discount to UE's 29.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BFS's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RPT's 19.9x.
| Metric | BFSSaul Centers, Inc. | UEUrban Edge Proper… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | RPTRithm Property Tr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $862M | $2.7B | $15.8B | $113M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $4.3B | $24.3B | $776M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.70x | 29.20x | 28.30x | -41.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 61.74x | 44.00x | 30.04x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.16x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.76x | 16.34x | 17.68x | 19.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.96x | 5.77x | 7.40x | 2.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.79x | 1.98x | 1.50x | 0.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.64x | 14.90x | 20.51x | — |
RPT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — UE and RPT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UE delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $1 for RPT. KIM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BFS's 3.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UE scores 8/9 vs RPT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BFSSaul Centers, Inc. | UEUrban Edge Proper… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | RPTRithm Property Tr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.7% | +7.8% | +5.8% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +3.2% | +3.1% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.3% | +3.9% | +3.9% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.36x | 1.21x | 0.82x | 2.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $1.6B | $8.4B | $663M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $49M | $213M | $79M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $1.7B | $8.6B | $742M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.70x | 2.28x | 2.46x | 1.04x |
Evenly matched — UE and RPT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RPT five years ago would be worth $28,019 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,718 for BFS. Over the past 12 months, RPT leads with a +481.6% total return vs BFS's +14.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RPT at 60.7% vs BFS's 8.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BFSSaul Centers, Inc. | UEUrban Edge Proper… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | RPTRithm Property Tr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.2% | +14.2% | +18.4% | -6.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.2% | +21.6% | +18.5% | +481.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.7% | +63.7% | +43.4% | +315.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.2% | +31.3% | +31.1% | +180.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.7% | +4.6% | +11.0% | +424.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.5% | +17.9% | +12.8% | +60.7% |
RPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RPT's 0.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BFS currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs RPT's 85.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BFSSaul Centers, Inc. | UEUrban Edge Proper… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | RPTRithm Property Tr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 0.47x | 0.54x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.75 | $22.26 | $24.31 | $17.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.16 | $17.46 | $19.76 | $2.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.4% | +97.1% | +96.6% | +85.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 61.3 | 52.3 | 63.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 57K | 887K | 4.9M | 24K |
BFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UE and RPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BFS as "Hold", UE as "Hold", KIM as "Hold", RPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for RPT (target: $24) vs -2.8% for UE (target: $21). For income investors, RPT offers the higher dividend yield at 9.74% vs UE's 3.51%.
| Metric | BFSSaul Centers, Inc. | UEUrban Edge Proper… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… | RPTRithm Property Tr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.50 | $21.00 | $24.25 | $24.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 7 | 36 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.7% | +3.5% | +4.5% | +9.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.36 | $0.76 | $1.06 | $1.46 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — UE and RPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
RPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). BFS leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
Best OverallRithm Property Trust Inc. (RPT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BFS vs UE vs KIM vs RPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BFS or UE or KIM or RPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rithm Property Trust Inc.
(RPT) is the stronger pick with 11. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM). Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (61. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BFS or UE or KIM or RPT?
On trailing P/E, Saul Centers, Inc.
(BFS) is the cheapest at 22. 7x versus Urban Edge Properties at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 30. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BFS or UE or KIM or RPT?
Over the past 5 years, Rithm Property Trust Inc.
(RPT) delivered a total return of +180. 2%, compared to +7. 2% for Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RPT returned +424. 1% versus BFS's -0. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BFS or UE or KIM or RPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Saul Centers, Inc.
(BFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Rithm Property Trust Inc. 's 0. 61β — meaning RPT is approximately 93% more volatile than BFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 82% versus 3% for Saul Centers, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BFS or UE or KIM or RPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rithm Property Trust Inc.
(RPT) is pulling ahead at 11. 8% versus 5. 1% for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rithm Property Trust Inc. grew EPS 97. 4% year-over-year, compared to -4. 9% for Saul Centers, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KIM leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BFS or UE or KIM or RPT?
Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 2. 8% for Rithm Property Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RPT leads at 73. 7% versus 26. 8% for UE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RPT leads at 84. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BFS or UE or KIM or RPT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) trades at 30.
0x forward P/E versus 61. 7x for Saul Centers, Inc. — 31. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RPT: 60. 4% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BFS or UE or KIM or RPT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Rithm Property Trust Inc. (RPT) offers the highest yield at 9. 7%, versus 3. 5% for Urban Edge Properties (UE).
09Is BFS or UE or KIM or RPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rithm Property Trust Inc.
(RPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), 9. 7% yield, +424. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RPT: +424. 1%, KIM: +11. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BFS and UE and KIM and RPT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BFS: 8.9% · UE: 12.2%)Net Margin>
%
(BFS: 12.4% · UE: 22.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(BFS: 22.7x · UE: 29.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.