REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BFS vs WHLR vs NXRT vs UE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Residential
REIT - Diversified
BFS vs WHLR vs NXRT vs UE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Residential | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $838M | $122M | $756M | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $298M | $99M | $252M | $486M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $12M | $-32M | $108M |
| Gross Margin | 69.0% | 66.8% | 91.1% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | 60.0% | 38.8% | 11.5% | 29.0% |
| Forward P/E | 60.0x | — | — | 47.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.61B | $484M | $1.56B | $1.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $24M | $14M | $49M |
BFS vs WHLR vs NXRT vs UE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) | 100 | 112.6 | +12.6% |
| Wheeler Real Estate… (WHLR) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| Urban Edge Properti… (UE) | 100 | 226.0 | +126.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BFS vs WHLR vs NXRT vs UE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BFS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth -4.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.8%
- Beta 0.32, yield 6.9%, current ratio 0.06x
- 8.5% FFO/revenue growth vs WHLR's -4.0%
- Beta 0.32 vs WHLR's 2.39, lower leverage
WHLR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
- 211.1% 10Y total return vs UE's 6.1%
- 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs UE's 3.4%
UE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, current ratio 2.54x
- Better valuation composite
- 22.2% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
- +23.9% vs WHLR's -99.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.5% FFO/revenue growth vs WHLR's -4.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs WHLR's 2.39, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs UE's 3.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.9% vs WHLR's -99.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 3.2% vs 1.1% |
BFS vs WHLR vs NXRT vs UE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BFS vs WHLR vs NXRT vs UE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UE leads in 2 of 6 categories
WHLR leads 1 • NXRT leads 1 • BFS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UE is the larger business by revenue, generating $486M annually — 4.9x WHLR's $99M. UE is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, UE holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $298M | $99M | $252M | $486M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $223M | $62M | $125M | $276M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | $12M | -$32M | $108M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $99M | $4M | $79M | $189M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.0% | +66.8% | +91.1% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +60.0% | +38.8% | +11.5% | +29.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +11.9% | -12.7% | +22.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.1% | +4.0% | +31.2% | +38.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | -8.8% | +0.5% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.3% | -100.0% | 0.0% | +157.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WHLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.1x trailing earnings, BFS trades at a 26% valuation discount to UE's 29.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WHLR's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NXRT's 18.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $838M | $122M | $756M | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $582M | $2.3B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.06x | -0.03x | -23.65x | 29.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 60.00x | — | — | 47.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.02x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.67x | 9.79x | 18.60x | 16.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.87x | 1.21x | 3.01x | 5.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.74x | 1.29x | 2.52x | 2.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.39x | 30.27x | 9.05x | 15.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — WHLR and UE each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WHLR delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. UE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UE scores 8/9 vs NXRT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.7% | +12.5% | -10.1% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.9% | -1.7% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +4.9% | +1.1% | +3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.1% | +6.0% | +1.5% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.37x | 5.11x | 5.18x | 1.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $460M | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $24M | $14M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $484M | $1.6B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.70x | 1.44x | 0.47x | 2.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UE five years ago would be worth $13,175 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for WHLR. Over the past 12 months, UE leads with a +23.9% total return vs WHLR's -99.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UE at 18.6% vs WHLR's -99.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.1% | -93.3% | +2.6% | +16.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.4% | -99.8% | -15.2% | +23.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.8% | -100.0% | -15.5% | +66.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.5% | -100.0% | -23.0% | +31.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.4% | +100.2% | +211.1% | +6.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | -99.0% | -5.5% | +18.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BFS and UE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WHLR's 2.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UE currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs WHLR's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 2.39x | 0.62x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.75 | $904.50 | $38.30 | $22.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.16 | $1.03 | $23.79 | $17.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +0.1% | +77.8% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 22.9 | 71.0 | 61.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 57K | 219K | 216K | 891K |
Analyst Outlook
NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BFS as "Hold", WHLR as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold", UE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.2% upside for BFS (target: $44) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, NXRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs UE's 3.44%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.50 | — | $27.00 | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 5 | 10 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.9% | +5.4% | +7.1% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 12 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.36 | $0.06 | $2.11 | $0.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +0.0% |
UE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). WHLR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BFS vs WHLR vs NXRT vs UE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BFS or WHLR or NXRT or UE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Saul Centers, Inc.
(BFS) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (60. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BFS or WHLR or NXRT or UE?
On trailing P/E, Saul Centers, Inc.
(BFS) is the cheapest at 22. 1x versus Urban Edge Properties at 29. 8x. On forward P/E, Urban Edge Properties is actually cheaper at 47. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BFS or WHLR or NXRT or UE?
Over the past 5 years, Urban Edge Properties (UE) delivered a total return of +31.
8%, compared to -100. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus BFS's -2. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BFS or WHLR or NXRT or UE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Saul Centers, Inc.
(BFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. 's 2. 39β — meaning WHLR is approximately 645% more volatile than BFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Urban Edge Properties (UE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 121% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BFS or WHLR or NXRT or UE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Saul Centers, Inc.
(BFS) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus -4. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WHLR leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BFS or WHLR or NXRT or UE?
Urban Edge Properties (UE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
8% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BFS leads at 41. 0% versus 11. 1% for NXRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BFS or WHLR or NXRT or UE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Urban Edge Properties (UE) trades at 47.
5x forward P/E versus 60. 0x for Saul Centers, Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BFS: 27. 2% to $43. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BFS or WHLR or NXRT or UE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 3. 4% for Urban Edge Properties (UE).
09Is BFS or WHLR or NXRT or UE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Saul Centers, Inc.
(BFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), 6. 9% yield). Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BFS: -2. 4%, WHLR: +100. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BFS and WHLR and NXRT and UE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.