Gold
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
BGL vs CWCO vs MSEX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
BGL vs CWCO vs MSEX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Regulated Water | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $11M | $529M | $955M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $132M | $199M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $18M | $44M |
| Gross Margin | — | 36.6% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 139015.1% | 28.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.1x | 31.4x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $708.60B | $419M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43K | $123.79T | $3M |
BGL vs CWCO vs MSEX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Gold Limited (BGL) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
| Consolidated Water … (CWCO) | 100 | 109.7 | +9.7% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BGL vs CWCO vs MSEX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BGL is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (16.1x vs 20.5x)
- 57.0% margin vs CWCO's 13.9%
CWCO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 100.0%
- 155.1% 10Y total return vs MSEX's 62.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 6.12x
MSEX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.5%, EPS growth -4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
- 1.5% revenue growth vs CWCO's -1.4%
- 3.2% ROA vs BGL's -56.7%, ROIC 4.7% vs -5.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.5% revenue growth vs CWCO's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.1x vs 20.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 57.0% margin vs CWCO's 13.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs BGL's 2.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MSEX's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.9% vs BGL's -94.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs BGL's -56.7%, ROIC 4.7% vs -5.9% |
BGL vs CWCO vs MSEX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BGL vs CWCO vs MSEX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSEX and BGL operate at a comparable scale, with $199M and $0 in trailing revenue. MSEX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CWCO's 13.9%. On growth, MSEX holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $132M | $199M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $25.98T | $81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $18M | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$793,440 | $33.67T | -$19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +36.6% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +139015.1% | +28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.9% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +254916.5% | -9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +114.9% | -11.5% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.1x trailing earnings, BGL trades at a 26% valuation discount to MSEX's 21.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BGL's 15.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MSEX's 15.8x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $529M | $955M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | -$123.08T | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.12x | — | 21.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.35x | 20.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 13.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.42x | -4.74x | 15.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.01x | 4.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.51x | 0.00x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.00x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CWCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSEX delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-172 for BGL. CWCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BGL's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CWCO scores 5/9 vs BGL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -171.6% | 0.0% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -56.7% | 0.0% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.9% | +26.6% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.9% | +16.0% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 0.00x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | -$123.08T | $416M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43,499 | $123.79T | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $708.6B | $419M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -38.74x | — | 4.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWCO five years ago would be worth $29,742 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $542 for BGL. Over the past 12 months, CWCO leads with a +47.9% total return vs BGL's -94.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWCO at 26.3% vs BGL's -62.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.6% | -3.9% | +3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.6% | +47.9% | -12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +101.4% | -25.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +197.4% | -28.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +155.1% | +62.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.2% | +26.3% | -9.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CWCO and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSEX is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BGL's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWCO currently trades 84.8% from its 52-week high vs BGL's 0.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.14x | 0.77x | -0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $166.50 | $39.12 | $62.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $22.69 | $44.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.7% | +84.8% | +82.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 47.9 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 557K | 163K | 160K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CWCO and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CWCO as "Buy", MSEX as "Buy". For income investors, CWCO offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MSEX's 2.67%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $53.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $497756.41 | $1.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CWCO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
BGL vs CWCO vs MSEX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BGL or CWCO or MSEX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger pick with 1.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO). Blue Gold Limited (BGL) offers the better valuation at 16. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BGL or CWCO or MSEX?
On trailing P/E, Blue Gold Limited (BGL) is the cheapest at 16.
1x versus Middlesex Water Company at 21. 8x. On forward P/E, Middlesex Water Company is actually cheaper at 20. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BGL or CWCO or MSEX?
Over the past 5 years, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) delivered a total return of +197. 4%, compared to -94. 6% for Blue Gold Limited (BGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWCO returned +153. 3% versus BGL's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BGL or CWCO or MSEX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
08β versus Blue Gold Limited's 2. 14β — meaning BGL is approximately -2908% more volatile than MSEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 100% for Blue Gold Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BGL or CWCO or MSEX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is pulling ahead at 1.
5% versus -1. 4% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Middlesex Water Company grew EPS -4. 5% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWCO leads at 12. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BGL or CWCO or MSEX?
Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Blue Gold Limited — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus 0. 0% for BGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSEX leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BGL or CWCO or MSEX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) trades at 20.
5x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — BGL or CWCO or MSEX?
In this comparison, CWCO (100.
0% yield), MSEX (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. BGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BGL or CWCO or MSEX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
08), 2. 7% yield). Blue Gold Limited (BGL) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSEX: +63. 3%, BGL: -94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BGL and CWCO and MSEX?
These companies operate in different sectors (BGL (Basic Materials) and CWCO (Utilities) and MSEX (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BGL is a small-cap deep-value stock; CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CWCO, MSEX pay a dividend while BGL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.