Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BGSI vs ORLY vs AZO vs LKQ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
BGSI vs ORLY vs AZO vs LKQ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $3.11B | $76.83B | $56.55B | $6.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.15B | $18.21B | $19.29B | $13.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $2.60B | $2.46B | $517M |
| Gross Margin | 39.2% | 51.6% | 52.1% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 19.6% | 18.4% | 7.3% |
| Forward P/E | 26.1x | 28.2x | 22.9x | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $8.49B | $12.29B | $5.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.23B | $194M | $272M | $319M |
BGSI vs ORLY vs AZO vs LKQ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| O'Reilly Automotive… (ORLY) | 100 | 330.1 | +230.1% |
| AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) | 100 | 297.1 | +197.1% |
| LKQ Corporation (LKQ) | 100 | 97.8 | -2.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BGSI vs ORLY vs AZO vs LKQ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BGSI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 99.8%, current ratio 3.14x
- Beta 0.82, yield 0.4%, current ratio 3.14x
ORLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 9.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.3%
- 419.4% 10Y total return vs AZO's 336.7%
- 6.4% revenue growth vs LKQ's -3.1%
- 14.3% margin vs BGSI's 0.6%
AZO is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.52 vs LKQ's 3.81
LKQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 4.5%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 28.2x)
- 4.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BGSI's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs LKQ's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 28.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.3% margin vs BGSI's 0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs LKQ's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BGSI's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.8% vs LKQ's -33.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs BGSI's 0.7%, ROIC 37.2% vs 103.7% |
BGSI vs ORLY vs AZO vs LKQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BGSI vs ORLY vs AZO vs LKQ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORLY leads in 3 of 6 categories
LKQ leads 2 • BGSI leads 1 • AZO leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AZO is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.3B annually — 6.1x BGSI's $3.2B. ORLY is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BGSI's 0.6%. On growth, ORLY holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $18.2B | $19.3B | $13.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $381M | $4.1B | $4.2B | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $2.6B | $2.5B | $517M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $287M | $1.9B | $1.9B | $808M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | +51.6% | +52.1% | +37.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +19.6% | +18.4% | +7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +14.3% | +12.8% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +10.5% | +9.6% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +10.2% | +8.2% | +0.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.8% | +15.6% | -4.6% | -52.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LKQ leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.4x trailing earnings, LKQ trades at a 92% valuation discount to BGSI's 134.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AZO offers better value at 1.57x vs LKQ's 4.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $76.8B | $56.6B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $85.1B | $68.6B | $11.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 134.53x | 30.92x | 23.54x | 11.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.14x | 28.20x | 22.91x | 9.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.48x | 1.57x | 4.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.12x | 21.43x | 16.24x | 7.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.97x | 4.32x | 2.99x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | — | — | 1.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.25x | 48.23x | 31.59x | 8.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BGSI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LKQ delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $2 for BGSI. LKQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BGSI's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ORLY scores 6/9 vs LKQ's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.8% | — | — | +7.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +15.9% | +13.0% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +103.7% | +37.2% | +34.0% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +109.1% | +48.2% | +39.5% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | — | — | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $487M | $8.3B | $12.0B | $4.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $194M | $272M | $319M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $8.5B | $12.3B | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 41.61x | 14.88x | 7.49x | 4.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ORLY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORLY five years ago would be worth $25,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,656 for LKQ. Over the past 12 months, ORLY leads with a +2.8% total return vs LKQ's -33.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORLY at 12.7% vs LKQ's -18.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.2% | +1.6% | +3.2% | -9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.1% | +2.8% | -6.9% | -33.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.5% | +43.2% | +24.9% | -46.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.9% | +151.2% | +127.9% | -33.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.3% | +419.4% | +336.7% | -3.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.9% | +12.7% | +7.7% | -18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ORLY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ORLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LKQ's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ORLY currently trades 84.5% from its 52-week high vs BGSI's 61.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.15x | 0.23x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $183.10 | $108.72 | $4388.11 | $42.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $110.80 | $86.77 | $3210.72 | $26.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.0% | +84.5% | +77.7% | +62.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.7 | 43.9 | 42.5 | 37.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38K | 5.0M | 177K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
LKQ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BGSI as "Buy", ORLY as "Buy", AZO as "Buy", LKQ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.1% upside for BGSI (target: $167) vs 20.5% for ORLY (target: $111). For income investors, LKQ offers the higher dividend yield at 4.51% vs BGSI's 0.38%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $166.50 | $110.64 | $4235.71 | $36.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 47 | 45 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — | — | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | — | — | $1.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | +2.8% | +2.3% |
ORLY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). LKQ leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
BGSI vs ORLY vs AZO vs LKQ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BGSI or ORLY or AZO or LKQ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). LKQ Corporation (LKQ) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Boyd Group Services Inc. (BGSI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BGSI or ORLY or AZO or LKQ?
On trailing P/E, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the cheapest at 11.
4x versus Boyd Group Services Inc. at 134. 5x. On forward P/E, LKQ Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AutoZone, Inc. wins at 1. 52x versus LKQ Corporation's 3. 81x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BGSI or ORLY or AZO or LKQ?
Over the past 5 years, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) delivered a total return of +151. 2%, compared to -33. 4% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORLY returned +419. 4% versus BGSI's -23. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BGSI or ORLY or AZO or LKQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus LKQ Corporation's 0. 90β — meaning LKQ is approximately 509% more volatile than ORLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 100% for Boyd Group Services Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BGSI or ORLY or AZO or LKQ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -3. 1% for LKQ Corporation (LKQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. grew EPS 9. 6% year-over-year, compared to -27. 2% for Boyd Group Services Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BGSI leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BGSI or ORLY or AZO or LKQ?
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus 0. 6% for Boyd Group Services Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BGSI leads at 92. 2% versus 7. 8% for LKQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AZO leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BGSI or ORLY or AZO or LKQ more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 52x versus LKQ Corporation's 3. 81x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 28. 2x for O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. — 19. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BGSI: 49. 1% to $166. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BGSI or ORLY or AZO or LKQ?
In this comparison, LKQ (4.
5% yield), BGSI (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ORLY, AZO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BGSI or ORLY or AZO or LKQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
(ORLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), +419. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ORLY: +419. 4%, BGSI: -23. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BGSI and ORLY and AZO and LKQ?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BGSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ORLY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AZO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LKQ is a small-cap deep-value stock. LKQ pays a dividend while BGSI, ORLY, AZO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.