Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BGSI vs PGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
BGSI vs PGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $3.29B | $115.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.15B | $85.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $10.71B |
| Gross Margin | 39.2% | 26.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 15.9% |
| Forward P/E | 26.9x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $6.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.23B | $143M |
Quick Verdict: BGSI vs PGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BGSI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -20.8% vs PGR's -25.7%
PGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -0.07, yield 0.6%
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.5%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs BGSI's -19.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.4% revenue growth vs BGSI's 4.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.1x vs 26.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.6% margin vs BGSI's 0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (26.9% vs 99.8%) | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BGSI's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -20.8% vs PGR's -25.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs BGSI's 0.7%, ROIC 27.0% vs 103.7% |
BGSI vs PGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BGSI vs PGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $85.2B annually — 27.0x BGSI's $3.2B. PGR is the more profitable business, keeping 12.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BGSI's 0.6%. On growth, PGR holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $85.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $381M | $13.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $10.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $287M | $17.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | +26.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +15.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +12.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +20.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.8% | +12.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BGSI and PGR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.7x trailing earnings, PGR trades at a 90% valuation discount to BGSI's 142.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BGSI's 1.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PGR's 11.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $115.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $122.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 142.22x | 13.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.93x | 12.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.18x | 11.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.03x | 1.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 4.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.89x | 7.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PGR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PGR delivers a 30.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $2 for BGSI. PGR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BGSI's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PGR scores 7/9 vs BGSI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.8% | +30.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +8.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +103.7% | +27.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +109.1% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $487M | $6.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $143M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $6.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 41.61x | 49.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PGR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PGR five years ago would be worth $21,022 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,034 for BGSI. Over the past 12 months, BGSI leads with a -20.8% total return vs PGR's -25.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PGR at 17.4% vs BGSI's -7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.2% | -0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.8% | -25.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.3% | +61.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.7% | +110.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.0% | +600.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.3% | +17.4% |
Risk & Volatility
PGR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PGR is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BGSI's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PGR currently trades 67.9% from its 52-week high vs BGSI's 64.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | -0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $183.10 | $289.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $115.40 | $192.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.5% | +67.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 43.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 39K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
PGR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BGSI as "Buy" and PGR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 41.1% upside for BGSI (target: $167) vs 17.0% for PGR (target: $230). For income investors, PGR offers the higher dividend yield at 0.58% vs BGSI's 0.36%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $166.50 | $230.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
PGR leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
BGSI vs PGR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BGSI or PGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is the stronger pick with 21.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for Boyd Group Services Inc. (BGSI). The Progressive Corporation (PGR) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Boyd Group Services Inc. (BGSI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BGSI or PGR?
On trailing P/E, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is the cheapest at 13.
7x versus Boyd Group Services Inc. at 142. 2x. On forward P/E, The Progressive Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BGSI or PGR?
Over the past 5 years, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) delivered a total return of +110.
2%, compared to -19. 7% for Boyd Group Services Inc. (BGSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PGR returned +600. 9% versus BGSI's -19. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BGSI or PGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
07β versus Boyd Group Services Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning BGSI is approximately -1412% more volatile than PGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 100% for Boyd Group Services Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BGSI or PGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is pulling ahead at 21.
4% versus 4. 2% for Boyd Group Services Inc. (BGSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Progressive Corporation grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to -27. 2% for Boyd Group Services Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PGR leads at 16. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BGSI or PGR?
The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
3% net margin versus 0. 6% for Boyd Group Services Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BGSI leads at 92. 2% versus 14. 2% for PGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BGSI leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BGSI or PGR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) trades at 12.
1x forward P/E versus 26. 9x for Boyd Group Services Inc. — 14. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BGSI: 41. 1% to $166. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BGSI or PGR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Progressive Corporation (PGR) offers the highest yield at 0. 6%, versus 0. 4% for Boyd Group Services Inc. (BGSI).
09Is BGSI or PGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
07), 0. 6% yield, +600. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PGR: +600. 9%, BGSI: -19. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BGSI and PGR?
These companies operate in different sectors (BGSI (Consumer Cyclical) and PGR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BGSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PGR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. PGR pays a dividend while BGSI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.