Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BIPC vs BIP vs AQN vs AWK vs NEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Diversified Utilities
Renewable Utilities
Regulated Water
Regulated Electric
BIPC vs BIP vs AQN vs AWK vs NEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Diversified Utilities | Renewable Utilities | Regulated Water | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $4.70B | $17.07B | $4.82B | $24.64B | $194.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.63B | $24.01B | $2.39B | $5.21B | $27.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-753M | $417M | $-27M | $1.10B | $8.18B |
| Gross Margin | 63.5% | 27.0% | 65.0% | 43.6% | 47.8% |
| Operating Margin | 61.2% | 25.2% | 20.9% | 36.5% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.9x | 17.4x | 20.7x | 23.1x |
| Total Debt | $13.27B | $64.50B | $6.70B | $15.92B | $95.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $430M | $3.20B | $35M | $119M | $2.81B |
BIPC vs BIP vs AQN vs AWK vs NEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Infrastr… (BIPC) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
| Brookfield Infrastr… (BIP) | 100 | 136.3 | +36.3% |
| Algonquin Power & U… (AQN) | 100 | 44.9 | -55.1% |
| American Water Work… (AWK) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 146.1 | +46.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIPC vs BIP vs AQN vs AWK vs NEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BIPC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BIP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 10.3%
- Rev growth 9.8%, EPS growth 7.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.0%
- PEG 0.92 vs AWK's 2.63
- PEG 0.92 vs 1.33
AQN is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.35, yield 5.9%, current ratio 0.76x
Among these 5 stocks, AWK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NEE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 266.0% 10Y total return vs BIP's 195.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.60x
- 11.0% revenue growth vs AQN's -3.5%
- 29.3% margin vs BIPC's -20.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.0% revenue growth vs AQN's -3.5% | |
| Value | PEG 0.92 vs 1.33 | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs BIPC's -20.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs BIP's 0.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs NEE's 2.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.0% vs AWK's -12.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs BIPC's -3.1%, ROIC 4.1% vs 12.0% |
BIPC vs BIP vs AQN vs AWK vs NEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BIPC vs BIP vs AQN vs AWK vs NEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BIP leads in 1 of 6 categories
AQN leads 1 • NEE leads 1 • BIPC leads 0 • AWK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AQN and NEE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEE is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.9B annually — 11.7x AQN's $2.4B. NEE is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BIPC's -20.7%. On growth, BIP holds the edge at +16.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $24.0B | $2.4B | $5.2B | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.9B | $10.2B | $815M | $2.8B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$753M | $417M | -$27M | $1.1B | $8.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$556M | -$13.7B | $2.6B | -$1.2B | -$3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.5% | +27.0% | +65.0% | +43.6% | +47.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +61.2% | +25.2% | +20.9% | +36.5% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -20.7% | +1.7% | -1.1% | +21.2% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | -57.2% | +109.1% | -23.1% | -13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.9% | +16.9% | +1.7% | +5.7% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -125.4% | -6.2% | +102.7% | -3.8% | +160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BIP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.1x trailing earnings, AWK trades at a 41% valuation discount to BIP's 37.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BIP offers better value at 1.12x vs AWK's 2.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $17.1B | $4.8B | $24.6B | $194.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17.5B | $78.4B | $11.5B | $40.4B | $287.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.00x | 37.69x | -3.47x | 22.14x | 28.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.91x | 17.39x | 20.72x | 23.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.12x | — | 2.81x | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.90x | 7.98x | 12.45x | 14.58x | 18.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.26x | 0.74x | 2.08x | 4.79x | 7.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.33x | 0.48x | 0.74x | 2.27x | 2.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.47x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AQN leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEE delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-36 for BIPC. AQN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIPC's 6.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIP scores 8/9 vs NEE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.2% | +1.2% | -0.5% | +10.1% | +12.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | +0.3% | -0.2% | +3.1% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.0% | +4.8% | +2.5% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.2% | +5.3% | +2.8% | +6.1% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.63x | 1.82x | 1.08x | 1.47x | 1.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.8B | $61.3B | $6.7B | $15.8B | $92.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $430M | $3.2B | $35M | $119M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.3B | $64.5B | $6.7B | $15.9B | $95.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.92x | 1.81x | 1.29x | 3.06x | 1.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEE five years ago would be worth $13,819 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,568 for AQN. Over the past 12 months, NEE leads with a +42.0% total return vs AWK's -12.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEE at 9.4% vs AQN's -6.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.6% | +9.0% | +3.7% | -2.5% | +16.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.8% | +22.3% | +19.8% | -12.5% | +42.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.2% | +17.8% | -16.8% | -8.2% | +31.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.7% | +25.3% | -44.3% | -8.1% | +38.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.4% | +195.1% | +32.5% | +100.9% | +266.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.1% | +5.6% | -6.0% | -2.8% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AWK and NEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWK is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIP's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEE currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs BIPC's 75.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 0.63x | 0.35x | -0.48x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.72 | $40.32 | $7.11 | $150.29 | $98.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.18 | $29.63 | $5.32 | $121.28 | $63.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.7% | +91.6% | +88.3% | +84.0% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 56.9 | 51.7 | 33.8 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.0M | 4.1M | 1.7M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BIP and NEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BIPC as "Buy", BIP as "Buy", AQN as "Hold", AWK as "Hold", NEE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.6% upside for BIPC (target: $57) vs 5.2% for NEE (target: $98). For income investors, BIP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.26% vs NEE's 2.40%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $46.20 | $6.79 | $134.67 | $98.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +10.3% | +5.9% | +2.6% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 | 0 | 12 | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.79 | $0.37 | $3.25 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BIP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). AQN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
BIPC vs BIP vs AQN vs AWK vs NEE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIPC or BIP or AQN or AWK or NEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 5% for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN). American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (20. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BIPC or BIP or AQN or AWK or NEE?
On trailing P/E, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the cheapest at 22. 1x versus Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. is actually cheaper at 17. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. wins at 0. 92x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BIPC or BIP or AQN or AWK or NEE?
Over the past 5 years, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) delivered a total return of +38. 2%, compared to -44. 3% for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEE returned +266. 0% versus AQN's +32. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BIPC or BIP or AQN or AWK or NEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 48β versus Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. 's 0. 63β — meaning BIP is approximately -231% more volatile than AWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 108% versus 7% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BIPC or BIP or AQN or AWK or NEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus -3. 5% for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. grew EPS 716. 7% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIPC leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BIPC or BIP or AQN or AWK or NEE?
NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus -59. 5% for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIPC leads at 61. 5% versus 19. 2% for AQN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AQN leads at 74. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BIPC or BIP or AQN or AWK or NEE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BIPC: 45. 6% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BIPC or BIP or AQN or AWK or NEE?
In this comparison, BIP (10.
3% yield), AQN (5. 9% yield), AWK (2. 6% yield), NEE (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. BIPC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BIPC or BIP or AQN or AWK or NEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 48), 2. 6% yield, +100. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWK: +100. 9%, BIPC: +122. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BIPC and BIP and AQN and AWK and NEE?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BIPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AQN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AWK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NEE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BIP, AQN, AWK, NEE pay a dividend while BIPC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.