Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BIPI vs BIPC vs BIP vs AWK vs NEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Gas
Diversified Utilities
Regulated Water
Regulated Electric
BIPI vs BIPC vs BIP vs AWK vs NEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Regulated Gas | Diversified Utilities | Regulated Water | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | — | $4.70B | $17.07B | $24.64B | $194.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $334.79B | $3.63B | $24.01B | $5.21B | $27.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104.03B | $-753M | $417M | $1.10B | $8.18B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 63.5% | 27.0% | 43.6% | 47.8% |
| Operating Margin | 96.8% | 61.2% | 25.2% | 36.5% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 30.9x | 20.7x | 23.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.07T | $13.27B | $64.50B | $15.92B | $95.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23.68B | $430M | $3.20B | $119M | $2.81B |
BIPI vs BIPC vs BIP vs AWK vs NEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIP Bermuda Holding… (BIPI) | 100 | 67.5 | -32.5% |
| Brookfield Infrastr… (BIPC) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| Brookfield Infrastr… (BIP) | 100 | 93.9 | -6.1% |
| American Water Work… (AWK) | 100 | 78.5 | -21.5% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIPI vs BIPC vs BIP vs AWK vs NEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BIPI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 31.1% margin vs BIPC's -20.7%
- 5.3% ROA vs BIPC's -3.1%, ROIC 9.5% vs 12.0%
BIPC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BIP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 10.3%
- Rev growth 9.8%, EPS growth 7.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.0%
- PEG 0.92 vs AWK's 2.63
- Beta 0.63, yield 10.3%, current ratio 2.48x
Among these 5 stocks, AWK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NEE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 266.0% 10Y total return vs BIP's 195.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.60x
- 11.0% revenue growth vs BIPC's 6.9%
- Beta 0.21 vs BIPI's 0.64
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.0% revenue growth vs BIPC's 6.9% | |
| Value | PEG 0.92 vs 1.33 | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.1% margin vs BIPC's -20.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs BIPI's 0.64 | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs NEE's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.0% vs AWK's -12.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs BIPC's -3.1%, ROIC 9.5% vs 12.0% |
BIPI vs BIPC vs BIP vs AWK vs NEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BIPI vs BIPC vs BIP vs AWK vs NEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BIPI leads in 2 of 6 categories
BIP leads 1 • NEE leads 1 • BIPC leads 0 • AWK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIPI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIPI is the larger business by revenue, generating $334.8B annually — 92.2x BIPC's $3.6B. BIPI is the more profitable business, keeping 31.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BIPC's -20.7%. On growth, BIPI holds the edge at +38.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $334.8B | $3.6B | $24.0B | $5.2B | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $2.9B | $10.2B | $2.8B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$753M | $417M | $1.1B | $8.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$556M | -$13.7B | -$1.2B | -$3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +63.5% | +27.0% | +43.6% | +47.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +96.8% | +61.2% | +25.2% | +36.5% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | -20.7% | +1.7% | +21.2% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | -15.3% | -57.2% | -23.1% | -13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.2% | -5.9% | +16.9% | +5.7% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -125.4% | -6.2% | -3.8% | +160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BIP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.1x trailing earnings, AWK trades at a 41% valuation discount to BIP's 37.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BIP offers better value at 1.12x vs AWK's 2.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $4.7B | $17.1B | $24.6B | $194.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $17.5B | $78.4B | $40.4B | $287.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -19.00x | 37.69x | 22.14x | 28.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 30.91x | 20.72x | 23.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.12x | 2.81x | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.90x | 7.98x | 14.58x | 18.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.26x | 0.74x | 4.79x | 7.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.33x | 0.48x | 2.27x | 2.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.47x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIPI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEE delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-36 for BIPC. BIPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIPC's 6.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIPI scores 8/9 vs NEE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | -36.2% | +1.2% | +10.1% | +12.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | -3.1% | +0.3% | +3.1% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.5% | +12.0% | +4.8% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.6% | +14.2% | +5.3% | +6.1% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 6.63x | 1.82x | 1.47x | 1.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.05T | $12.8B | $61.3B | $15.8B | $92.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23.7B | $430M | $3.2B | $119M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.07T | $13.3B | $64.5B | $15.9B | $95.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.92x | 1.81x | 3.06x | 1.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEE five years ago would be worth $13,819 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,664 for BIPI. Over the past 12 months, NEE leads with a +42.0% total return vs AWK's -12.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEE at 9.4% vs AWK's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.1% | -12.6% | +9.0% | -2.5% | +16.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.9% | +5.8% | +22.3% | -12.5% | +42.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.7% | +0.2% | +17.8% | -8.2% | +31.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.4% | -4.7% | +25.3% | -8.1% | +38.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.4% | +122.4% | +195.1% | +100.9% | +266.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.9% | +0.1% | +5.6% | -2.8% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AWK and NEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWK is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIPI's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEE currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs BIPC's 75.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.62x | 0.63x | -0.48x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.18 | $51.72 | $40.32 | $150.29 | $98.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.44 | $34.18 | $29.63 | $121.28 | $63.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +75.7% | +91.6% | +84.0% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 47.3 | 56.9 | 33.8 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 1.1M | 1.0M | 1.7M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BIP and NEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BIPC as "Buy", BIP as "Buy", AWK as "Hold", NEE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.6% upside for BIPC (target: $57) vs 5.2% for NEE (target: $98). For income investors, BIP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.26% vs NEE's 2.40%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $57.00 | $46.20 | $134.67 | $98.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 16 | 29 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +10.3% | +2.6% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 15 | 12 | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.79 | $3.25 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% | +1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BIPI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BIP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BIPI vs BIPC vs BIP vs AWK vs NEE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIPI or BIPC or BIP or AWK or NEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (20. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BIPI or BIPC or BIP or AWK or NEE?
On trailing P/E, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the cheapest at 22. 1x versus Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, American Water Works Company, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. wins at 0. 92x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BIPI or BIPC or BIP or AWK or NEE?
Over the past 5 years, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) delivered a total return of +38. 2%, compared to -13. 4% for BIP Bermuda Holdings I Limited (BIPI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEE returned +266. 0% versus BIPI's -13. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BIPI or BIPC or BIP or AWK or NEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 48β versus BIP Bermuda Holdings I Limited's 0. 64β — meaning BIPI is approximately -234% more volatile than AWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BIP Bermuda Holdings I Limited (BIPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 7% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BIPI or BIPC or BIP or AWK or NEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus 6. 9% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. grew EPS 716. 7% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for NextEra Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIPC leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BIPI or BIPC or BIP or AWK or NEE?
BIP Bermuda Holdings I Limited (BIPI) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
1% net margin versus -6. 6% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIPI leads at 96. 8% versus 25. 1% for BIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIPI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BIPI or BIPC or BIP or AWK or NEE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) trades at 20. 7x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BIPC: 45. 6% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BIPI or BIPC or BIP or AWK or NEE?
In this comparison, BIP (10.
3% yield), AWK (2. 6% yield), NEE (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. BIPI, BIPC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BIPI or BIPC or BIP or AWK or NEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 48), 2. 6% yield, +100. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWK: +100. 9%, BIPI: -13. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BIPI and BIPC and BIP and AWK and NEE?
These companies operate in different sectors (BIPI (Industrials) and BIPC (Utilities) and BIP (Utilities) and AWK (Utilities) and NEE (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BIPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AWK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NEE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BIP, AWK, NEE pay a dividend while BIPI, BIPC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.