Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BKE vs TLYS vs ANF vs ZUMZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
BKE vs TLYS vs ANF vs ZUMZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $2.66B | $125M | $3.60B | $425M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.28B | $554M | $5.27B | $929M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $206M | $-17M | $507M | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 48.9% | 29.7% | 58.6% | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | -3.5% | 13.4% | 1.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | — | 8.0x | 31.3x |
| Total Debt | $326M | $170M | $1.17B | $199M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $267M | $46M | $760M | $128M |
BKE vs TLYS vs ANF vs ZUMZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) | 100 | 371.9 | +271.9% |
| Tilly's, Inc. (TLYS) | 100 | 81.3 | -18.8% |
| Abercrombie & Fitch… (ANF) | 100 | 675.6 | +575.6% |
| Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) | 100 | 102.7 | +2.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BKE vs TLYS vs ANF vs ZUMZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BKE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 225.7% 10Y total return vs ANF's 219.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 77.0%, current ratio 2.05x
- Beta 0.89, yield 7.5%, current ratio 2.05x
- 16.1% margin vs TLYS's -3.2%
TLYS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.79
- Beta 0.79 vs ZUMZ's 1.87
- +232.8% vs ANF's +12.7%
ANF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth -2.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 6.4% revenue growth vs BKE's -3.4%
- Better valuation composite
ZUMZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs BKE's -3.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs TLYS's -3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs ZUMZ's 1.87 | |
| Dividends | 7.5% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +232.8% vs ANF's +12.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.6% ROA vs TLYS's -5.3%, ROIC 38.4% vs -6.0% |
BKE vs TLYS vs ANF vs ZUMZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BKE vs TLYS vs ANF vs ZUMZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKE leads in 2 of 6 categories
ANF leads 1 • TLYS leads 1 • ZUMZ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANF is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 9.5x TLYS's $554M. BKE is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TLYS's -3.2%. On growth, BKE holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $554M | $5.3B | $929M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $282M | -$9M | $862M | $44M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $206M | -$17M | $507M | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $215M | $3M | $378M | $51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.9% | +29.7% | +58.6% | +35.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | -3.5% | +13.4% | +1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | -3.2% | +9.6% | +1.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +0.6% | +7.2% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +5.3% | +5.4% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +121.6% | +3.1% | +38.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TLYS and ANF and ZUMZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, ANF trades at a 77% valuation discount to ZUMZ's 32.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANF's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZUMZ's 29.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $125M | $3.6B | $425M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $249M | $4.0B | $496M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.46x | -7.17x | 7.51x | 32.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.87x | — | 7.98x | 31.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.06x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.31x | — | 4.68x | 29.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.18x | 0.23x | 0.68x | 0.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.22x | 1.48x | 2.68x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.31x | — | 9.52x | 7.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKE leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKE delivers a 44.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-21 for TLYS. ZUMZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TLYS's 2.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZUMZ scores 7/9 vs BKE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +44.4% | -21.3% | +38.5% | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.6% | -5.3% | +15.1% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +38.4% | -6.0% | +31.4% | +3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.3% | -8.5% | +30.5% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 2.00x | 0.82x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $59M | $124M | $409M | $71M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $267M | $46M | $760M | $128M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $326M | $170M | $1.2B | $199M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 302.38x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANF five years ago would be worth $19,266 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,885 for TLYS. Over the past 12 months, TLYS leads with a +232.8% total return vs ANF's +12.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANF at 49.9% vs TLYS's -18.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.1% | +105.9% | -36.6% | -3.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.4% | +232.8% | +12.7% | +113.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.6% | -46.2% | +237.1% | +51.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.6% | -51.1% | +92.7% | -45.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +225.7% | +61.9% | +219.7% | +56.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.6% | -18.7% | +49.9% | +14.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BKE and TLYS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZUMZ's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BKE currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs ANF's 59.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 0.79x | 1.42x | 1.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.69 | $5.52 | $133.11 | $31.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.60 | $0.57 | $65.45 | $11.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.9% | +75.4% | +59.0% | +79.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.5 | 50.2 | 33.0 | 56.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 395K | 1.4M | 1.2M | 151K |
Analyst Outlook
TLYS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BKE as "Hold", TLYS as "Hold", ANF as "Hold", ZUMZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 128.4% upside for TLYS (target: $10) vs -22.1% for ZUMZ (target: $20). BKE is the only dividend payer here at 7.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $53.00 | $9.50 | $120.80 | $19.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 17 | 55 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.5% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.94 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +12.5% | +9.0% |
BKE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ANF leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BKE vs TLYS vs ANF vs ZUMZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BKE or TLYS or ANF or ZUMZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for The Buckle, Inc. (BKE). Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BKE or TLYS or ANF or ZUMZ?
On trailing P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Zumiez Inc. at 32. 1x. On forward P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BKE or TLYS or ANF or ZUMZ?
Over the past 5 years, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) delivered a total return of +92. 7%, compared to -51. 1% for Tilly's, Inc. (TLYS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKE returned +225. 7% versus ZUMZ's +56. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BKE or TLYS or ANF or ZUMZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tilly's, Inc.
(TLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Zumiez Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning ZUMZ is approximately 136% more volatile than TLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 2% for Tilly's, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BKE or TLYS or ANF or ZUMZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -3. 4% for The Buckle, Inc. (BKE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zumiez Inc. grew EPS 961. 9% year-over-year, compared to -11. 6% for The Buckle, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANF leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BKE or TLYS or ANF or ZUMZ?
The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -3. 2% for Tilly's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKE leads at 19. 8% versus -3. 5% for TLYS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANF leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BKE or TLYS or ANF or ZUMZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 31. 3x for Zumiez Inc. — 23. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TLYS: 128. 4% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BKE or TLYS or ANF or ZUMZ?
In this comparison, BKE (7.
5% yield) pays a dividend. TLYS, ANF, ZUMZ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BKE or TLYS or ANF or ZUMZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 7. 5% yield, +225. 7% 10Y return). Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKE: +225. 7%, ZUMZ: +56. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BKE and TLYS and ANF and ZUMZ?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BKE is a small-cap deep-value stock; TLYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; ZUMZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BKE pays a dividend while TLYS, ANF, ZUMZ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.