Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BKE vs ZUMZ vs ANF vs TLYS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BKE
The Buckle, Inc.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.66B
5Y Perf.+271.9%
ZUMZ
Zumiez Inc.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$425M
5Y Perf.+2.7%
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.60B
5Y Perf.+575.6%
TLYS
Tilly's, Inc.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$125M
5Y Perf.-18.8%

BKE vs ZUMZ vs ANF vs TLYS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BKE logoBKE
ZUMZ logoZUMZ
ANF logoANF
TLYS logoTLYS
IndustryApparel - RetailApparel - RetailApparel - RetailApparel - Retail
Market Cap$2.66B$425M$3.60B$125M
Revenue (TTM)$1.28B$929M$5.27B$554M
Net Income (TTM)$206M$13M$507M$-17M
Gross Margin48.9%35.8%58.6%29.7%
Operating Margin20.1%1.8%13.4%-3.5%
Forward P/E12.9x31.3x8.0x
Total Debt$326M$199M$1.17B$170M
Cash & Equiv.$267M$128M$760M$46M

BKE vs ZUMZ vs ANF vs TLYSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BKE
ZUMZ
ANF
TLYS
StockMay 20May 26Return
The Buckle, Inc. (BKE)100371.9+271.9%
Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ)100102.7+2.7%
Abercrombie & Fitch… (ANF)100675.6+575.6%
Tilly's, Inc. (TLYS)10081.3-18.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BKE vs ZUMZ vs ANF vs TLYS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BKE leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. TLYS also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BKE
The Buckle, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

BKE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 225.7% 10Y total return vs ANF's 219.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 77.0%, current ratio 2.05x
  • Beta 0.89, yield 7.5%, current ratio 2.05x
  • 16.1% margin vs TLYS's -3.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
ZUMZ
Zumiez Inc.
The Quality Angle

ZUMZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
The Growth Play

ANF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth -2.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
  • 6.4% revenue growth vs BKE's -3.4%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure
TLYS
Tilly's, Inc.
The Income Pick

TLYS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.79
  • Beta 0.79 vs ZUMZ's 1.87
  • +232.8% vs ANF's +12.7%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthANF logoANF6.4% revenue growth vs BKE's -3.4%
ValueANF logoANFBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBKE logoBKE16.1% margin vs TLYS's -3.2%
Stability / SafetyTLYS logoTLYSBeta 0.79 vs ZUMZ's 1.87
DividendsBKE logoBKE7.5% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TLYS logoTLYS+232.8% vs ANF's +12.7%
Efficiency (ROA)BKE logoBKE20.6% ROA vs TLYS's -5.3%, ROIC 38.4% vs -6.0%

BKE vs ZUMZ vs ANF vs TLYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BKEThe Buckle, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.2B
ZUMZZumiez Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ANFAbercrombie & Fitch Co.
FY 2024
Abercrombie
51.7%$2.6B
Hollister
48.3%$2.4B
TLYSTilly's, Inc.
FY 2024
Breakage
51.0%$12M
Customer Loyalty Program
28.4%$7M
Shipping and Handling
20.6%$5M

BKE vs ZUMZ vs ANF vs TLYS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBKELAGGINGZUMZ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BKE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ANF is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 9.5x TLYS's $554M. BKE is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TLYS's -3.2%. On growth, BKE holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBKE logoBKEThe Buckle, Inc.ZUMZ logoZUMZZumiez Inc.ANF logoANFAbercrombie & Fit…TLYS logoTLYSTilly's, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$929M$5.3B$554M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$282M$44M$862M-$9M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$206M$13M$507M-$17M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$215M$51M$378M$3M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.9%+35.8%+58.6%+29.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.1%+1.8%+13.4%-3.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.1%+1.4%+9.6%-3.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.8%+5.5%+7.2%+0.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.3%+4.4%+5.4%+5.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.1%+38.5%+3.1%+121.6%
BKE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ZUMZ and ANF and TLYS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 7.5x trailing earnings, ANF trades at a 77% valuation discount to ZUMZ's 32.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANF's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZUMZ's 29.1x.

MetricBKE logoBKEThe Buckle, Inc.ZUMZ logoZUMZZumiez Inc.ANF logoANFAbercrombie & Fit…TLYS logoTLYSTilly's, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2.7B$425M$3.6B$125M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.7B$496M$4.0B$249M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.46x32.09x7.51x-7.17x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.87x31.32x7.98x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.31x29.12x4.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.18x0.46x0.68x0.23x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.22x1.33x2.68x1.48x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.31x7.82x9.52x
Evenly matched — ZUMZ and ANF and TLYS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BKE leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

BKE delivers a 44.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-21 for TLYS. ZUMZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TLYS's 2.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZUMZ scores 7/9 vs BKE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBKE logoBKEThe Buckle, Inc.ZUMZ logoZUMZZumiez Inc.ANF logoANFAbercrombie & Fit…TLYS logoTLYSTilly's, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+44.4%+4.4%+38.5%-21.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+20.6%+2.5%+15.1%-5.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+38.4%+3.1%+31.4%-6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+35.3%+5.5%+30.5%-8.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94756
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.77x0.61x0.82x2.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$59M$71M$409M$124M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$267M$128M$760M$46M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$326M$199M$1.2B$170M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense302.38x
BKE leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ANF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ANF five years ago would be worth $19,266 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,885 for TLYS. Over the past 12 months, TLYS leads with a +232.8% total return vs ANF's +12.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANF at 49.9% vs TLYS's -18.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBKE logoBKEThe Buckle, Inc.ZUMZ logoZUMZZumiez Inc.ANF logoANFAbercrombie & Fit…TLYS logoTLYSTilly's, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.1%-3.3%-36.6%+105.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+57.4%+113.7%+12.7%+232.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+93.6%+51.4%+237.1%-46.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+63.6%-45.5%+92.7%-51.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+225.7%+56.8%+219.7%+61.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+24.6%+14.8%+49.9%-18.7%
ANF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BKE and TLYS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZUMZ's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BKE currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs ANF's 59.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBKE logoBKEThe Buckle, Inc.ZUMZ logoZUMZZumiez Inc.ANF logoANFAbercrombie & Fit…TLYS logoTLYSTilly's, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.89x1.87x1.42x0.79x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$61.69$31.70$133.11$5.52
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$35.60$11.41$65.45$0.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.9%+79.0%+59.0%+75.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.556.533.050.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded395K151K1.2M1.4M
Evenly matched — BKE and TLYS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TLYS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: BKE as "Hold", ZUMZ as "Hold", ANF as "Hold", TLYS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 128.4% upside for TLYS (target: $10) vs -22.1% for ZUMZ (target: $20). BKE is the only dividend payer here at 7.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBKE logoBKEThe Buckle, Inc.ZUMZ logoZUMZZumiez Inc.ANF logoANFAbercrombie & Fit…TLYS logoTLYSTilly's, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$53.00$19.50$120.80$9.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts20335517
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises004
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.94
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+9.0%+12.5%0.0%
TLYS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BKE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ANF leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Buckle, Inc. (BKE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BKE vs ZUMZ vs ANF vs TLYS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BKE or ZUMZ or ANF or TLYS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

(ANF) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for The Buckle, Inc. (BKE). Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BKE or ZUMZ or ANF or TLYS?

On trailing P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

(ANF) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Zumiez Inc. at 32. 1x. On forward P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BKE or ZUMZ or ANF or TLYS?

Over the past 5 years, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

(ANF) delivered a total return of +92. 7%, compared to -51. 1% for Tilly's, Inc. (TLYS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKE returned +225. 7% versus ZUMZ's +56. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BKE or ZUMZ or ANF or TLYS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tilly's, Inc.

(TLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Zumiez Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning ZUMZ is approximately 136% more volatile than TLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 2% for Tilly's, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BKE or ZUMZ or ANF or TLYS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

(ANF) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -3. 4% for The Buckle, Inc. (BKE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zumiez Inc. grew EPS 961. 9% year-over-year, compared to -11. 6% for The Buckle, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANF leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BKE or ZUMZ or ANF or TLYS?

The Buckle, Inc.

(BKE) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -3. 2% for Tilly's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKE leads at 19. 8% versus -3. 5% for TLYS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANF leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BKE or ZUMZ or ANF or TLYS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

(ANF) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 31. 3x for Zumiez Inc. — 23. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TLYS: 128. 4% to $9. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BKE or ZUMZ or ANF or TLYS?

In this comparison, BKE (7.

5% yield) pays a dividend. ZUMZ, ANF, TLYS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BKE or ZUMZ or ANF or TLYS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Buckle, Inc.

(BKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 7. 5% yield, +225. 7% 10Y return). Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKE: +225. 7%, ZUMZ: +56. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BKE and ZUMZ and ANF and TLYS?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BKE is a small-cap deep-value stock; ZUMZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; TLYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BKE pays a dividend while ZUMZ, ANF, TLYS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BKE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ZUMZ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ANF

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TLYS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BKE and ZUMZ and ANF and TLYS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BKE: 9.3% · ZUMZ: 4.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BKE: 13.5x · ZUMZ: 32.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.