Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BKU vs WTFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
BKU vs WTFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.48B | $10.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.14B | $4.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $268M | $824M |
| Gross Margin | 49.5% | 62.2% |
| Operating Margin | 16.7% | 26.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 11.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.97B | $4.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $218M | $468M |
BKU vs WTFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BankUnited, Inc. (BKU) | 100 | 255.8 | +155.8% |
| Wintrust Financial … (WTFC) | 100 | 356.9 | +256.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BKU vs WTFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BKU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for bank quality.
- NIM 4.1% vs WTFC's 3.1%
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 11.6x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WTFC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
WTFC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.16
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 12.1%
- 224.8% 10Y total return vs BKU's 70.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.7% NII/revenue growth vs BKU's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 11.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WTFC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.16 vs BKU's 1.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.6% vs WTFC's +34.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WTFC's 0.4% |
BKU vs WTFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BKU vs WTFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTFC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 2.0x BKU's $2.1B. WTFC is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BKU's 12.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $393M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $268M | $824M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $359M | $915M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.5% | +62.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +21.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.1% | +25.5% |
Valuation Metrics
BKU leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, WTFC trades at a 2% valuation discount to BKU's 13.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WTFC offers better value at 0.66x vs BKU's 1.17x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $10.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.2B | $14.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.36x | 13.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.46x | 11.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.17x | 0.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.32x | 11.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.63x | 2.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.71x | 11.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WTFC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WTFC delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $9 for BKU. WTFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.62x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BKU's 0.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKU scores 8/9 vs WTFC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.0% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $218M | $468M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WTFC five years ago would be worth $20,287 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,842 for BKU. Over the past 12 months, BKU leads with a +46.6% total return vs WTFC's +34.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKU at 43.2% vs WTFC's 35.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.1% | +6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.6% | +34.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.8% | +147.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.4% | +102.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.4% | +224.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.2% | +35.3% |
Risk & Volatility
WTFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WTFC is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BKU's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.11 | $162.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.05 | $113.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.7% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 63.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 843K | 438K |
Analyst Outlook
WTFC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BKU as "Hold" and WTFC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.5% upside for WTFC (target: $175) vs 13.7% for BKU (target: $54). BKU is the only dividend payer here at 2.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $53.75 | $174.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.19 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | 0.0% |
WTFC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BKU leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
BKU vs WTFC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BKU or WTFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) is the stronger pick with 6.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for BankUnited, Inc. (BKU). Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BKU or WTFC?
On trailing P/E, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus BankUnited, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, BankUnited, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Wintrust Financial Corporation wins at 0. 59x versus BankUnited, Inc. 's 1. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BKU or WTFC?
Over the past 5 years, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) delivered a total return of +102.
9%, compared to +8. 4% for BankUnited, Inc. (BKU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTFC returned +224. 8% versus BKU's +70. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BKU or WTFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
16β versus BankUnited, Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning BKU is approximately 3% more volatile than WTFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 62% versus 65% for BankUnited, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BKU or WTFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) is pulling ahead at 6.
7% versus 5. 8% for BankUnited, Inc. (BKU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BankUnited, Inc. grew EPS 14. 9% year-over-year, compared to 12. 1% for Wintrust Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BKU or WTFC?
Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
5% net margin versus 12. 5% for BankUnited, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTFC leads at 26. 4% versus 16. 7% for BKU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WTFC leads at 62. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BKU or WTFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 59x versus BankUnited, Inc. 's 1. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, BankUnited, Inc. (BKU) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for Wintrust Financial Corporation — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WTFC: 15. 5% to $174. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — BKU or WTFC?
In this comparison, BKU (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. WTFC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BKU or WTFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BankUnited, Inc.
(BKU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), 2. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKU: +70. 4%, WTFC: +224. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BKU and WTFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BKU pays a dividend while WTFC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.