Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BLBX vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
BLBX vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $40M | $88.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 48.0% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -165.7% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $229K | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39K | $837M |
BLBX vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blackboxstocks Inc. (BLBX) | 100 | 35.0 | -65.0% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 161.7 | +61.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLBX vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLBX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +197.4% vs ICE's -10.4%
ICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
- 225.3% 10Y total return vs BLBX's -92.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% NII/revenue growth vs BLBX's -5.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.1% margin vs BLBX's -182.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs BLBX's 2.09 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +197.4% vs ICE's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs BLBX's -51.4%, ROIC 7.5% vs -52.4% |
BLBX vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BLBX vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 5198.2x BLBX's $2M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLBX's -182.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -165.7% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -182.1% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -169.3% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -48.1% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ICE leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $40M | $88.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $40M | $107.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.93x | 27.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.45x | 7.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.23x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-78 for BLBX. BLBX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs BLBX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.2% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -51.4% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -52.4% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.9% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $189,627 | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39,158 | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $228,785 | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.98x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BLBX and ICE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ICE five years ago would be worth $14,335 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,280 for BLBX. Over the past 12 months, BLBX leads with a +197.4% total return vs ICE's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLBX at 45.9% vs ICE's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.0% | -2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +197.4% | -10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.4% | +50.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.2% | +43.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.4% | +225.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.9% | +14.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ICE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLBX's 2.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICE currently trades 82.5% from its 52-week high vs BLBX's 34.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.09x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.64 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.82 | $143.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.8% | +82.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 38.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 850K | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
ICE is the only dividend payer here at 1.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $195.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% |
ICE leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
BLBX vs ICE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLBX or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger pick with 7. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for Blackboxstocks Inc. (BLBX). Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (19. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BLBX or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) delivered a total return of +43. 4%, compared to -7. 2% for Blackboxstocks Inc. (BLBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +225. 3% versus BLBX's -92. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BLBX or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Blackboxstocks Inc. 's 2. 09β — meaning BLBX is approximately 539% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blackboxstocks Inc. (BLBX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BLBX or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is pulling ahead at 7. 5% versus -5. 3% for Blackboxstocks Inc. (BLBX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to -13. 6% for Blackboxstocks Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BLBX or ICE?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus -182. 1% for Blackboxstocks Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus -165. 7% for BLBX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICE leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BLBX or ICE?
In this comparison, ICE (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. BLBX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BLBX or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 2% yield, +225. 3% 10Y return). Blackboxstocks Inc. (BLBX) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +225. 3%, BLBX: -92. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BLBX and ICE?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLBX (Technology) and ICE (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
ICE pays a dividend while BLBX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.