Construction
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
Residential Construction
Industrial - Distribution
BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Industrial - Distribution | Residential Construction | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $8.85B | $49.03B | $8.06B | $5.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.82B | $31.63B | $2.97B | $3.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $292M | $2.07B | $265M | $205M |
| Gross Margin | 29.9% | 30.7% | 34.0% | 40.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 9.2% | 13.0% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 22.6x | 26.9x | 24.1x |
| Total Debt | $5.65B | $5.97B | $1.05B | $539M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $182M | $674M | $322M | $56M |
BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 384.6 | +284.6% |
| Ferguson plc (FERG) | 100 | 318.4 | +218.4% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 465.4 | +365.4% |
| MSC Industrial Dire… (MSM) | 100 | 151.4 | +51.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLDR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 24.1x)
FERG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 9.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.5%
- 3.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
IBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 8.9% 10Y total return vs BLDR's 6.4%
- PEG 1.11 vs BLDR's 1.79
- Beta 1.19, yield 1.1%, current ratio 3.03x
- 8.9% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
MSM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 38.6%, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 0.86 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
- 3.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 24.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs BLDR's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.7% vs BLDR's -25.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.0% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 20.7% vs 6.4% |
BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBP leads in 3 of 6 categories
BLDR leads 1 • MSM leads 1 • FERG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FERG is the larger business by revenue, generating $31.6B annually — 10.6x IBP's $3.0B. IBP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, MSM holds the edge at +4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.8B | $31.6B | $3.0B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $3.3B | $704M | $414M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $292M | $2.1B | $265M | $205M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $862M | $1.0B | $49M | $167M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.9% | +30.7% | +34.0% | +40.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +9.2% | +13.0% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +6.6% | +8.9% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +3.2% | +1.7% | +4.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.1% | -2.0% | -0.4% | +4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -151.2% | +2.9% | +18.4% | +12.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BLDR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.6x trailing earnings, BLDR trades at a 33% valuation discount to IBP's 30.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 1.27x vs BLDR's 2.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.9B | $49.0B | $8.1B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.3B | $54.3B | $8.8B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.57x | 27.06x | 30.81x | 29.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.17x | 22.63x | 26.91x | 24.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.60x | 1.59x | 1.27x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.39x | 18.23x | 17.93x | 15.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 1.59x | 2.71x | 1.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.06x | 8.61x | 11.40x | 4.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.37x | 30.59x | 26.79x | 24.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP delivers a 39.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. MSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs MSM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +35.1% | +39.1% | +14.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +11.8% | +13.0% | +8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.4% | +18.0% | +20.7% | +12.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +22.6% | +22.6% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.30x | 1.02x | 1.48x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.5B | $5.3B | $731M | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $182M | $674M | $322M | $56M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.6B | $6.0B | $1.1B | $539M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.19x | 15.59x | 12.26x | 12.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBP five years ago would be worth $22,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,940 for MSM. Over the past 12 months, IBP leads with a +82.7% total return vs BLDR's -25.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 39.3% vs BLDR's -11.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.5% | +12.9% | +12.7% | +24.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.3% | +51.6% | +82.7% | +43.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.6% | +86.0% | +170.4% | +26.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.9% | +104.5% | +126.8% | +29.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +636.9% | +382.9% | +894.2% | +87.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.0% | +23.0% | +39.3% | +8.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSM currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 1.24x | 1.19x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $151.03 | $271.64 | $349.00 | $106.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $73.40 | $166.04 | $150.83 | $74.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.0% | +92.8% | +85.7% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.6 | 48.6 | 45.7 | 64.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 1.4M | 319K | 598K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBP and MSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLDR as "Buy", FERG as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", MSM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 37.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs -6.9% for MSM (target: $98). For income investors, MSM offers the higher dividend yield at 3.23% vs FERG's 0.97%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $109.92 | $271.00 | $293.00 | $97.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 43 | 14 | 27 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | +1.1% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.45 | $3.24 | $3.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | +1.9% | +2.1% | +0.7% |
IBP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BLDR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ferguson plc (FERG) is the stronger pick with 3.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) offers the better valuation at 20. 6x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM?
On trailing P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) is the cheapest at 20. 6x versus Installed Building Products, Inc. at 30. 8x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 1. 11x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 79x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM?
Over the past 5 years, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) delivered a total return of +126. 8%, compared to +29. 4% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +894. 2% versus MSM's +87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MSC Industrial Direct Co.
, Inc. (MSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 93% more volatile than MSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ferguson plc (FERG) is pulling ahead at 3.
8% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ferguson plc grew EPS 9. 3% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IBP leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM?
Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBP leads at 13. 0% versus 5. 2% for BLDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSM leads at 40. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 79x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 26. 9x for Installed Building Products, Inc. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 37. 3% to $109. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM?
In this comparison, MSM (3.
2% yield), IBP (1. 1% yield), FERG (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. BLDR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 1. 1% yield, +894. 2% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +894. 2%, BLDR: +636. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLDR and FERG and IBP and MSM?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLDR (Industrials) and FERG (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and MSM (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FERG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSM is a small-cap income-oriented stock. FERG, IBP, MSM pay a dividend while BLDR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.