Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.85B
5Y Perf.+284.6%
FERG
Ferguson plc

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNYSE • GB
Market Cap$49.03B
5Y Perf.+218.4%
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.

Residential Construction

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.06B
5Y Perf.+365.4%
MSM
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.86B
5Y Perf.+51.4%

BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BLDR logoBLDR
FERG logoFERG
IBP logoIBP
MSM logoMSM
IndustryConstructionIndustrial - DistributionResidential ConstructionIndustrial - Distribution
Market Cap$8.85B$49.03B$8.06B$5.86B
Revenue (TTM)$14.82B$31.63B$2.97B$3.81B
Net Income (TTM)$292M$2.07B$265M$205M
Gross Margin29.9%30.7%34.0%40.7%
Operating Margin4.2%9.2%13.0%8.4%
Forward P/E14.2x22.6x26.9x24.1x
Total Debt$5.65B$5.97B$1.05B$539M
Cash & Equiv.$182M$674M$322M$56M

BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BLDR
FERG
IBP
MSM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR)100384.6+284.6%
Ferguson plc (FERG)100318.4+218.4%
Installed Building … (IBP)100465.4+365.4%
MSC Industrial Dire… (MSM)100151.4+51.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IBP leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. BLDR and FERG also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
The Value Play

BLDR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (14.2x vs 24.1x)
Best for: value
FERG
Ferguson plc
The Growth Play

FERG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 9.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.5%
  • 3.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
Best for: growth exposure
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 8.9% 10Y total return vs BLDR's 6.4%
  • PEG 1.11 vs BLDR's 1.79
  • Beta 1.19, yield 1.1%, current ratio 3.03x
  • 8.9% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
MSM
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
The Income Pick

MSM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 3.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 38.6%, current ratio 1.68x
  • Beta 0.86 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
  • 3.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFERG logoFERG3.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
ValueBLDR logoBLDRLower P/E (14.2x vs 24.1x)
Quality / MarginsIBP logoIBP8.9% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
Stability / SafetyMSM logoMSMBeta 0.86 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
DividendsMSM logoMSM3.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)IBP logoIBP+82.7% vs BLDR's -25.3%
Efficiency (ROA)IBP logoIBP13.0% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 20.7% vs 6.4%

BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BLDRBuilders FirstSource, Inc.
FY 2025
Specialty Building Products And Services
26.8%$4.1B
Lumber And Lumber Sheet Goods
25.5%$3.9B
Windows Doors And Millwork
25.3%$3.8B
Manufactured Products
22.5%$3.4B
FERGFerguson plc
FY 2025
United States Segment
100.0%$29.3B
IBPInstalled Building Products, Inc.
FY 2025
Product Installation
50.0%$2.8B
Insulation
30.9%$1.7B
Shower Doors Shelving And Mirrors
4.0%$219M
Other Building Products
3.3%$184M
Garage Doors
3.1%$173M
Waterproofing
2.9%$161M
Rain Gutters
2.3%$125M
Other (2)
3.5%$193M
MSMMSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$3.8B

BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIBPLAGGINGFERG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FERG is the larger business by revenue, generating $31.6B annually — 10.6x IBP's $3.0B. IBP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, MSM holds the edge at +4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…FERG logoFERGFerguson plcIBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…MSM logoMSMMSC Industrial Di…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$14.8B$31.6B$3.0B$3.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.2B$3.3B$704M$414M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$292M$2.1B$265M$205M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$862M$1.0B$49M$167M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+29.9%+30.7%+34.0%+40.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.2%+9.2%+13.0%+8.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.0%+6.6%+8.9%+5.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.8%+3.2%+1.7%+4.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-10.1%-2.0%-0.4%+4.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-151.2%+2.9%+18.4%+12.0%
IBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BLDR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 20.6x trailing earnings, BLDR trades at a 33% valuation discount to IBP's 30.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 1.27x vs BLDR's 2.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…FERG logoFERGFerguson plcIBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…MSM logoMSMMSC Industrial Di…
Market CapShares × price$8.9B$49.0B$8.1B$5.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$14.3B$54.3B$8.8B$6.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.57x27.06x30.81x29.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.17x22.63x26.91x24.15x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.60x1.59x1.27x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.39x18.23x17.93x15.70x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.58x1.59x2.71x1.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.06x8.61x11.40x4.20x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.37x30.59x26.79x24.33x
BLDR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

IBP delivers a 39.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. MSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs MSM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…FERG logoFERGFerguson plcIBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…MSM logoMSMMSC Industrial Di…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.9%+35.1%+39.1%+14.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.6%+11.8%+13.0%+8.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.4%+18.0%+20.7%+12.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.5%+22.6%+22.6%+17.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95685
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.30x1.02x1.48x0.39x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.5B$5.3B$731M$483M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$182M$674M$322M$56M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.6B$6.0B$1.1B$539M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.19x15.59x12.26x12.56x
IBP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IBP five years ago would be worth $22,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,940 for MSM. Over the past 12 months, IBP leads with a +82.7% total return vs BLDR's -25.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 39.3% vs BLDR's -11.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…FERG logoFERGFerguson plcIBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…MSM logoMSMMSC Industrial Di…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-23.5%+12.9%+12.7%+24.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-25.3%+51.6%+82.7%+43.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-29.6%+86.0%+170.4%+26.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+53.9%+104.5%+126.8%+29.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+636.9%+382.9%+894.2%+87.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-11.0%+23.0%+39.3%+8.2%
IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSM currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…FERG logoFERGFerguson plcIBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…MSM logoMSMMSC Industrial Di…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.65x1.24x1.19x0.86x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$151.03$271.64$349.00$106.05
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$73.40$166.04$150.83$74.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+53.0%+92.8%+85.7%+99.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10031.648.645.764.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.4M1.4M319K598K
MSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — IBP and MSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BLDR as "Buy", FERG as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", MSM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 37.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs -6.9% for MSM (target: $98). For income investors, MSM offers the higher dividend yield at 3.23% vs FERG's 0.97%.

MetricBLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…FERG logoFERGFerguson plcIBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…MSM logoMSMMSC Industrial Di…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$109.92$271.00$293.00$97.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts43142728
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%+1.1%+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2054
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.45$3.24$3.39
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.7%+1.9%+2.1%+0.7%
Evenly matched — IBP and MSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IBP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BLDR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallInstalled Building Products… (IBP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BLDR vs FERG vs IBP vs MSM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ferguson plc (FERG) is the stronger pick with 3.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) offers the better valuation at 20. 6x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM?

On trailing P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc.

(BLDR) is the cheapest at 20. 6x versus Installed Building Products, Inc. at 30. 8x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 1. 11x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 79x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM?

Over the past 5 years, Installed Building Products, Inc.

(IBP) delivered a total return of +126. 8%, compared to +29. 4% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +894. 2% versus MSM's +87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MSC Industrial Direct Co.

, Inc. (MSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 93% more volatile than MSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ferguson plc (FERG) is pulling ahead at 3.

8% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ferguson plc grew EPS 9. 3% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IBP leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM?

Installed Building Products, Inc.

(IBP) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBP leads at 13. 0% versus 5. 2% for BLDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSM leads at 40. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 79x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 26. 9x for Installed Building Products, Inc. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 37. 3% to $109. 92.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM?

In this comparison, MSM (3.

2% yield), IBP (1. 1% yield), FERG (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. BLDR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BLDR or FERG or IBP or MSM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.

(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 1. 1% yield, +894. 2% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +894. 2%, BLDR: +636. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BLDR and FERG and IBP and MSM?

These companies operate in different sectors (BLDR (Industrials) and FERG (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and MSM (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FERG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSM is a small-cap income-oriented stock. FERG, IBP, MSM pay a dividend while BLDR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BLDR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FERG

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBP

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BLDR and FERG and IBP and MSM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BLDR: -10.1% · FERG: -2.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BLDR: 20.6x · FERG: 27.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.