Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BLFS vs BFLY vs NVCR vs SONO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Consumer Electronics
BLFS vs BFLY vs NVCR vs SONO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $1.11B | $1.92B | $1.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $100M | $103M | $674M | $1.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-76M | $-173M | $-41M |
| Gross Margin | 64.0% | 49.2% | 75.2% | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | -10.9% | -79.5% | -27.2% | 2.0% |
| Forward P/E | 156.4x | — | — | 47.3x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $20M | $290M | $60M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $33M | $150M | $103M | $175M |
BLFS vs BFLY vs NVCR vs SONO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BioLife Solutions, … (BLFS) | 100 | 119.6 | +19.6% |
| Butterfly Network, … (BFLY) | 100 | 42.5 | -57.5% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 22.2 | -77.8% |
| Sonos, Inc. (SONO) | 100 | 93.1 | -6.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLFS vs BFLY vs NVCR vs SONO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLFS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.67
- 12.2% 10Y total return vs SONO's -25.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.67, Low D/E 4.8%, current ratio 5.23x
- Beta 1.67, current ratio 5.23x
BFLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 8.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs SONO's -4.9%
- +94.5% vs NVCR's +1.1%
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SONO is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- -2.8% margin vs BFLY's -73.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs SONO's -4.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.8% margin vs BFLY's -73.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.67 vs BFLY's 3.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.5% vs NVCR's +1.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.6% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC -2.8% vs -76.8% |
BLFS vs BFLY vs NVCR vs SONO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BLFS vs BFLY vs NVCR vs SONO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SONO leads in 1 of 6 categories
BLFS leads 1 • BFLY leads 1 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BFLY and SONO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SONO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 14.6x BLFS's $100M. SONO is the more profitable business, keeping -2.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFLY's -73.6%. On growth, BFLY holds the edge at +25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $100M | $103M | $674M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$76M | -$165M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$76M | -$173M | -$41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11M | -$19M | -$48M | $118M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.0% | +49.2% | +75.2% | +44.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | -79.5% | -27.2% | +2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | -73.6% | -25.7% | -2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | -18.3% | -7.1% | +8.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.9% | +25.0% | +12.3% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.0% | -100.0% | -29.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SONO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.9B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $979M | $2.1B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -92.48x | -13.68x | -13.80x | -29.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 156.43x | — | — | 47.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 142.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.74x | 11.37x | 2.92x | 1.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.02x | 5.35x | 5.51x | 5.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 106.19x | — | — | 16.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLFS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLFS delivers a -2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. BLFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLFS scores 6/9 vs BFLY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.9% | -36.8% | -50.8% | -10.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | -25.6% | -16.5% | -4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | -76.8% | -16.4% | -13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.2% | -39.3% | -28.9% | -9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.10x | 0.85x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | -$130M | $187M | -$115M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $33M | $150M | $103M | $175M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $20M | $290M | $60M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.62x | -71.59x | -96.80x | 2587.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BFLY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLFS five years ago would be worth $7,300 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +94.5% total return vs NVCR's +1.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFLY at 26.2% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.2% | +13.1% | +28.3% | -14.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.3% | +94.5% | +1.1% | +66.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.7% | +100.9% | -75.7% | -31.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.0% | -65.1% | -91.3% | -60.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1221.1% | -57.2% | +30.3% | -25.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.5% | +26.2% | -37.6% | -11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BLFS and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BLFS is the less volatile stock with a 1.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs BFLY's 74.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 3.28x | 2.20x | 1.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.62 | $5.72 | $20.06 | $19.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.86 | $1.32 | $9.82 | $8.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.1% | +74.1% | +83.9% | +75.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.7 | 46.2 | 69.8 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 422K | 6.4M | 1.5M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLFS as "Buy", BFLY as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", SONO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 27.8% for BFLY (target: $5).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.00 | $5.42 | $33.50 | $19.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 7 | 15 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.5% |
SONO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). BLFS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
BLFS vs BFLY vs NVCR vs SONO: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLFS or BFLY or NVCR or SONO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). Analysts rate BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BLFS or BFLY or NVCR or SONO?
Over the past 5 years, BioLife Solutions, Inc.
(BLFS) delivered a total return of -27. 0%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLFS returned +1221% versus BFLY's -57. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BLFS or BFLY or NVCR or SONO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioLife Solutions, Inc.
(BLFS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 67β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 28β — meaning BFLY is approximately 96% more volatile than BLFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BLFS or BFLY or NVCR or SONO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BioLife Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 43. 2% year-over-year, compared to -64. 5% for Sonos, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BFLY leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BLFS or BFLY or NVCR or SONO?
Sonos, Inc.
(SONO) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 2% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SONO leads at -3. 5% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BLFS or BFLY or NVCR or SONO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sonos, Inc.
(SONO) trades at 47. 3x forward P/E versus 156. 4x for BioLife Solutions, Inc. — 109. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — BLFS or BFLY or NVCR or SONO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BLFS or BFLY or NVCR or SONO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BioLife Solutions, Inc.
(BLFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1221% 10Y return). Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BLFS: +1221%, BFLY: -57. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BLFS and BFLY and NVCR and SONO?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLFS (Healthcare) and BFLY (Healthcare) and NVCR (Healthcare) and SONO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BLFS is a small-cap high-growth stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SONO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.