Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BLND vs BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Mortgages
BLND vs BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $409M | $469M | $526M | $439M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $128M | $191M | $3.16B | $1.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-166M | $27M | $126M |
| Gross Margin | 74.8% | 77.7% | 85.6% | 90.6% |
| Operating Margin | -14.3% | -64.3% | 58.0% | 10.1% |
| Forward P/E | 21.8x | — | 8.0x | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $161M | $615M | $14.44B | $3.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $117M | $503M | $118M |
BLND vs BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blend Labs, Inc. (BLND) | 100 | 8.9 | -91.1% |
| Better Home & Finan… (BETR) | 100 | 6.2 | -93.8% |
| UWM Holdings Corpor… (UWMC) | 100 | 44.3 | -55.7% |
| Guild Holdings Comp… (GHLD) | 100 | 125.0 | +25.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLND vs BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLND lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BETR is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 1.2% vs UWMC's 0.0%
- +132.3% vs BLND's -51.1%
UWMC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.50, yield 100.0%
- Beta 1.50, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.67x
- 65.8% NII/revenue growth vs BLND's -23.8%
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 10.2x)
GHLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 60.9%, EPS growth 343.8%
- 58.4% 10Y total return vs UWMC's -41.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.04, current ratio 0.09x
- 8.3% margin vs BETR's -86.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.8% NII/revenue growth vs BLND's -23.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 10.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs BETR's -86.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs BETR's 1.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GHLD's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +132.3% vs BLND's -51.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs BETR's -12.9%, ROIC 2.4% vs -13.5% |
BLND vs BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BLND vs BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GHLD leads in 3 of 6 categories
UWMC leads 2 • BLND leads 0 • BETR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GHLD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UWMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 24.8x BLND's $128M. GHLD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BETR's -86.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $128M | $191M | $3.2B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | -$115M | $695M | $199M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$166M | $27M | $126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$225M | -$2.7B | $25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.8% | +77.7% | +85.6% | +90.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.3% | -64.3% | +58.0% | +10.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | -86.7% | +0.9% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | -121.9% | -86.1% | -56.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.2% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.5% | +34.9% | — | +148.6% |
Valuation Metrics
UWMC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, GHLD trades at a 54% valuation discount to UWMC's 28.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UWMC's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GHLD's 21.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $409M | $469M | $526M | $439M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $526M | $967M | $14.5B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.10x | -2.82x | 28.17x | 12.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.76x | — | 8.01x | 10.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 7.68x | 21.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.31x | 2.45x | 0.17x | 0.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 12.59x | 0.45x | 0.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GHLD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GHLD delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-11 for BETR. GHLD carries lower financial leverage with a 2.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BETR's 16.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UWMC scores 5/9 vs GHLD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.6% | -10.6% | +1.7% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | -12.9% | +0.2% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -70.7% | -13.5% | +8.9% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.5% | -15.7% | +19.0% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 16.55x | 9.06x | 2.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $117M | $499M | $13.9B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $117M | $503M | $118M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $161M | $615M | $14.4B | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.54x | 0.75x | 1.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BLND and BETR and GHLD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GHLD five years ago would be worth $16,569 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $581 for BETR. Over the past 12 months, BETR leads with a +132.3% total return vs BLND's -51.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLND at 31.8% vs BETR's -60.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.7% | -12.1% | -21.1% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.1% | +132.3% | -7.4% | +62.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.7% | -94.0% | -21.7% | +121.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | -94.2% | -22.7% | +65.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | -93.9% | -41.1% | +58.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.8% | -60.8% | -7.8% | +30.4% |
Risk & Volatility
GHLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GHLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BETR's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GHLD currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs BETR's 32.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 1.93x | 1.50x | 0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.49 | $94.06 | $7.14 | $23.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.33 | $10.81 | $3.27 | $11.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.9% | +32.4% | +47.3% | +84.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 55.1 | 42.1 | 43.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.8M | 546K | 15.7M | 152K |
Analyst Outlook
UWMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLND as "Buy", BETR as "Hold", UWMC as "Hold", GHLD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 76.9% upside for UWMC (target: $6) vs -11.9% for GHLD (target: $18). For income investors, UWMC offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs GHLD's 2.47%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | $40.00 | $5.98 | $17.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 1 | 13 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +100.0% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.39 | $0.49 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
GHLD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UWMC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
BLND vs BETR vs UWMC vs GHLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLND or BETR or UWMC or GHLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is the stronger pick with 65.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 8% for Blend Labs, Inc. (BLND). Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Blend Labs, Inc. (BLND) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLND or BETR or UWMC or GHLD?
On trailing P/E, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the cheapest at 12.
8x versus UWM Holdings Corporation at 28. 2x. On forward P/E, UWM Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLND or BETR or UWMC or GHLD?
Over the past 5 years, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) delivered a total return of +65.
7%, compared to -94. 2% for Better Home & Finance Holding Company (BETR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GHLD returned +58. 4% versus BETR's -93. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLND or BETR or UWMC or GHLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
04β versus Better Home & Finance Holding Company's 1. 93β — meaning BETR is approximately 4498% more volatile than GHLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 17% for Better Home & Finance Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLND or BETR or UWMC or GHLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is pulling ahead at 65.
8% versus -23. 8% for Blend Labs, Inc. (BLND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guild Holdings Company grew EPS 343. 8% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for UWM Holdings Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLND or BETR or UWMC or GHLD?
Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
3% net margin versus -86. 7% for Better Home & Finance Holding Company — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UWMC leads at 58. 0% versus -64. 3% for BETR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GHLD leads at 90. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLND or BETR or UWMC or GHLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) trades at 8.
0x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Blend Labs, Inc. — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UWMC: 76. 9% to $5. 98.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLND or BETR or UWMC or GHLD?
In this comparison, UWMC (100.
0% yield), GHLD (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. BLND, BETR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLND or BETR or UWMC or GHLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
04), 2. 5% yield). Better Home & Finance Holding Company (BETR) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GHLD: +58. 4%, BETR: -93. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLND and BETR and UWMC and GHLD?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLND (Technology) and BETR (Financial Services) and UWMC (Financial Services) and GHLD (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BLND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BETR is a small-cap high-growth stock; UWMC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GHLD is a small-cap high-growth stock. UWMC, GHLD pay a dividend while BLND, BETR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.