Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BLNE vs PFSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
BLNE vs PFSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $19M | $4.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $4.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $507M |
| Gross Margin | 12.6% | 91.4% |
| Operating Margin | -230.4% | 34.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $23.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $302M |
BLNE vs PFSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beeline Holdings, I… (BLNE) | 100 | 1.4 | -98.6% |
| PennyMac Financial … (PFSI) | 100 | 258.9 | +158.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLNE vs PFSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLNE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.88, Low D/E 28.0%, current ratio 1.19x
- +57.5% vs PFSI's -8.0%
PFSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 173.8%, EPS growth 59.2%
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs BLNE's -75.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs BLNE's 98.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.5% margin vs BLNE's -258.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs BLNE's 1.88 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.5% vs PFSI's -8.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.8% ROA vs BLNE's -33.3%, ROIC 4.4% vs -22.5% |
BLNE vs PFSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BLNE vs PFSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFSI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 509.1x BLNE's $9M. PFSI is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLNE's -2.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | $507M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$22M | -$3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +91.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +34.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -32.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.2% | +7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BLNE leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19M | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $27.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.98x | 9.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 1.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PFSI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFSI delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-42 for BLNE. BLNE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFSI's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFSI scores 4/9 vs BLNE's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -42.3% | +12.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -33.3% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.5% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -36.9% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 5.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $22.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $302M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $23.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.61x | 0.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PFSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFSI five years ago would be worth $15,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $126 for BLNE. Over the past 12 months, BLNE leads with a +57.5% total return vs PFSI's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFSI at 16.0% vs BLNE's -51.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.1% | -33.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.5% | -8.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.7% | +56.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +59.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.5% | +624.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.6% | +16.0% |
Risk & Volatility
PFSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNE's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFSI currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs BLNE's 45.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.65 | $160.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.62 | $82.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.4% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 666K | 609K |
Analyst Outlook
PFSI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
PFSI is the only dividend payer here at 1.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $143.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.5% | +0.1% |
PFSI leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BLNE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
BLNE vs PFSI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLNE or PFSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 98. 6% for Beeline Holdings, Inc. (BLNE). PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BLNE or PFSI?
Over the past 5 years, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) delivered a total return of +59. 1%, compared to -98. 7% for Beeline Holdings, Inc. (BLNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +624. 6% versus BLNE's -75. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BLNE or PFSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Beeline Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 88β — meaning BLNE is approximately 102% more volatile than PFSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Beeline Holdings, Inc. (BLNE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 5% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BLNE or PFSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus 98. 6% for Beeline Holdings, Inc. (BLNE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beeline Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 92. 0% year-over-year, compared to 59. 2% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BLNE or PFSI?
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 5% net margin versus -284. 7% for Beeline Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFSI leads at 34. 6% versus -247. 4% for BLNE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFSI leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BLNE or PFSI?
In this comparison, PFSI (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. BLNE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BLNE or PFSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 3% yield, +624. 6% 10Y return). Beeline Holdings, Inc. (BLNE) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFSI: +624. 6%, BLNE: -75. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BLNE and PFSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLNE (Consumer Defensive) and PFSI (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
PFSI pays a dividend while BLNE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.