Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BMRC vs WABC vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BMRC vs WABC vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $420M | $1.38B | $2.78B | $2.22B | $7.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $177M | $311M | $643M | $819M | $3.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $120M | $209M | $195M | $550M |
| Gross Margin | 76.1% | 94.3% | 79.9% | 79.0% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | 29.2% | 60.8% | 43.8% | 29.5% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 12.3x | 14.2x | 10.5x | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $69M | $138M | $991M | $373M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $225M | $601M | $108M | $183M | $511M |
BMRC vs WABC vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of Marin Banco… (BMRC) | 100 | 77.5 | -22.5% |
| Westamerica Bancorp… (WABC) | 100 | 93.0 | -7.0% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BMRC vs WABC vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BMRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 51.8%, EPS growth 6.3%
- 51.8% NII/revenue growth vs WABC's -5.0%
WABC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 27 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 15.5%, current ratio 0.39x
- Beta 0.63, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.39x
- NIM 4.1% vs BMRC's 2.8%
CVBF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WABC's 3.2%
BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 101.1% 10Y total return vs CVBF's 67.6%
- PEG 0.90 vs CVBF's 4.48
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.90 vs 4.48
COLB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +32.6% vs BANR's +9.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.8% NII/revenue growth vs WABC's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.90 vs 4.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs COLB's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WABC's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs BANR's +9.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% |
BMRC vs WABC vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BMRC vs WABC vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WABC leads in 3 of 6 categories
BMRC leads 0 • CVBF leads 0 • BANR leads 0 • COLB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WABC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 18.2x BMRC's $177M. WABC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COLB's 17.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $177M | $311M | $643M | $819M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $71M | $171M | $294M | $253M | $895M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $120M | $209M | $195M | $550M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32M | $123M | $217M | $248M | $724M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.1% | +94.3% | +79.9% | +79.0% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +60.8% | +43.8% | +29.5% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +44.6% | +32.5% | +23.8% | +17.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +44.9% | +33.8% | +30.3% | +22.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.7% | -14.5% | +11.1% | +11.2% | +5.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BMRC and WABC and COLB each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, BMRC trades at a 29% valuation discount to CVBF's 13.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WABC offers better value at 0.90x vs CVBF's 4.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $420M | $1.4B | $2.8B | $2.2B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $264M | $914M | $3.7B | $2.4B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.55x | 10.55x | 13.49x | 11.63x | 12.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.91x | 12.34x | 14.24x | 10.47x | 9.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.26x | 0.90x | 4.25x | 1.00x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.92x | 4.58x | 13.02x | 9.55x | 11.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.38x | 4.43x | 4.33x | 2.71x | 2.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.65x | 1.21x | 1.16x | 1.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.38x | 9.85x | 12.81x | 8.96x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WABC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WABC delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for COLB. WABC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COLB's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMRC scores 7/9 vs WABC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.3% | +12.9% | +9.3% | +10.3% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +2.0% | +1.4% | +1.2% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +15.1% | +6.8% | +7.7% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +21.3% | +9.3% | +10.1% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.16x | 0.43x | 0.19x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$156M | -$463M | $883M | $190M | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $225M | $601M | $108M | $183M | $511M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $69M | $138M | $991M | $373M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.02x | 11.87x | 2.12x | 1.11x | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BMRC and BANR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BANR five years ago would be worth $12,958 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,185 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, COLB leads with a +32.6% total return vs BANR's +9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BMRC at 26.2% vs WABC's 16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.0% | +16.7% | +10.9% | +6.6% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.7% | +15.9% | +13.1% | +9.1% | +32.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.8% | +59.4% | +94.0% | +60.7% | +75.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.5% | -1.1% | +12.2% | +29.6% | -18.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.5% | +54.8% | +67.6% | +101.1% | +51.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.2% | +16.8% | +24.7% | +17.1% | +20.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WABC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WABC is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WABC currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs COLB's 90.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.63x | 0.94x | 0.80x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.48 | $56.22 | $21.48 | $69.83 | $32.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.25 | $44.93 | $17.95 | $57.05 | $21.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.5% | +97.6% | +95.5% | +93.9% | +90.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 58.4 | 57.9 | 58.0 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 104K | 190K | 1.6M | 292K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WABC and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BMRC as "Hold", WABC as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", BANR as "Hold", COLB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 3.9% for WABC (target: $57). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs BANR's 2.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.25 | $57.00 | $24.75 | $70.00 | $32.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 8 | 16 | 13 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +3.0% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 27 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.01 | $1.76 | $0.82 | $1.96 | $1.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.0% | +2.9% | +1.6% | +1.5% |
WABC leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
BMRC vs WABC vs CVBF vs BANR vs COLB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BMRC or WABC or CVBF or BANR or COLB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) is the stronger pick with 51.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC). Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BMRC or WABC or CVBF or BANR or COLB?
On trailing P/E, Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus CVB Financial Corp. at 13. 5x. On forward P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 90x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BMRC or WABC or CVBF or BANR or COLB?
Over the past 5 years, Banner Corporation (BANR) delivered a total return of +29.
6%, compared to -18. 1% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANR returned +101. 1% versus BMRC's +41. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BMRC or WABC or CVBF or BANR or COLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
63β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning COLB is approximately 117% more volatile than WABC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 51% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BMRC or WABC or CVBF or BANR or COLB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) is pulling ahead at 51.
8% versus -5. 0% for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bank of Marin Bancorp grew EPS 625. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 2% for Westamerica Bancorporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BMRC or WABC or CVBF or BANR or COLB?
Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the more profitable company, earning 44.
6% net margin versus 17. 1% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. — meaning it keeps 44. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WABC leads at 60. 8% versus 23. 4% for COLB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WABC leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BMRC or WABC or CVBF or BANR or COLB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for CVB Financial Corp. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 7% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — BMRC or WABC or CVBF or BANR or COLB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 3. 0% for Banner Corporation (BANR).
09Is BMRC or WABC or CVBF or BANR or COLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
63), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WABC: +54. 8%, COLB: +51. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BMRC and WABC and CVBF and BANR and COLB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BMRC is a small-cap high-growth stock; WABC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.