BMY vs LLY

For growth investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger pick with 44.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the cheapest at 16.

5x versus Eli Lilly and Company at 43. 1x. On forward P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +424.

9%, compared to +5. 9% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1261% versus BMY's +8. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

50β versus Eli Lilly and Company's 0. 71β — meaning LLY is approximately 41% more volatile than BMY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 160% versus 3% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is pulling ahead at 44.

7% versus -0. 2% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company grew EPS 178. 2% year-over-year, compared to 96. 0% for Eli Lilly and Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, LLY leads at 31. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.

7% net margin versus 14. 6% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus 26. 3% for BMY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LLY leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) trades at 9.

0x forward P/E versus 28. 6x for Eli Lilly and Company — 19. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LLY: 27. 4% to $1258. 47.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 0. 6% for Eli Lilly and Company (LLY).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

71), 0. 6% yield, +1261% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1261%, BMY: +8. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BMY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LLY is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.