BODI vs XPOF

For growth investors, Xponential Fitness, Inc.

(XPOF) is the stronger pick with -1. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 9% for The Beachbody Company, Inc. (BODI). Analysts rate Xponential Fitness, Inc. (XPOF) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Xponential Fitness, Inc.

(XPOF) delivered a total return of -46. 6%, compared to -97. 2% for The Beachbody Company, Inc. (BODI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPOF returned -46. 6% versus BODI's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Beachbody Company, Inc.

(BODI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 37β versus Xponential Fitness, Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning XPOF is approximately 42% more volatile than BODI relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xponential Fitness, Inc.

(XPOF) is pulling ahead at -1. 7% versus -39. 9% for The Beachbody Company, Inc. (BODI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beachbody Company, Inc. grew EPS 96. 1% year-over-year, compared to 35. 2% for Xponential Fitness, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XPOF leads at 9. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Beachbody Company, Inc.

(BODI) is the more profitable company, earning -1. 1% net margin versus -10. 7% for Xponential Fitness, Inc. — meaning it keeps -1. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XPOF leads at 25. 3% versus 3. 2% for BODI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XPOF leads at 75. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, XPOF (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. BODI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Xponential Fitness, Inc.

(XPOF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XPOF: -46. 6%, BODI: -97. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (BODI (Communication Services) and XPOF (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

XPOF pays a dividend while BODI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.