Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BOF vs FRSH vs SMPL vs HAIN vs BYND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
BOF vs FRSH vs SMPL vs HAIN vs BYND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Software - Application | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $43M | $2.50B | $1.24B | $84M | $414M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $871M | $1.45B | $1.51B | $265M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $180M | $91M | $-544M | $244M |
| Gross Margin | 16.3% | 85.0% | 34.0% | 20.0% | 3.5% |
| Operating Margin | -41.0% | 1.8% | 14.4% | -31.8% | -82.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.9x | 7.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $8M | $67M | $304M | $779M | $508M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $632M | $98M | $54M | $208M |
BOF vs FRSH vs SMPL vs HAIN vs BYND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BranchOut Food Inc. (BOF) | 100 | 107.4 | +7.4% |
| Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) | 100 | 51.4 | -48.6% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| The Hain Celestial … (HAIN) | 100 | 5.9 | -94.1% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOF vs FRSH vs SMPL vs HAIN vs BYND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 130.6%, EPS growth 15.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 108.8%
- 130.6% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6%
- +80.8% vs BYND's -64.9%
FRSH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SMPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.38
- 3.7% 10Y total return vs BOF's -21.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- Beta 0.38, current ratio 3.64x
Among these 5 stocks, HAIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BYND ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 92.2% margin vs BOF's -49.8%
- 39.3% ROA vs BOF's -38.1%, ROIC -44.4% vs -58.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 130.6% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs BOF's -49.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs HAIN's 2.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.8% vs BYND's -64.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs BOF's -38.1%, ROIC -44.4% vs -58.5% |
BOF vs FRSH vs SMPL vs HAIN vs BYND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BOF vs FRSH vs SMPL vs HAIN vs BYND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMPL leads in 1 of 6 categories
FRSH leads 1 • BOF leads 1 • HAIN leads 0 • BYND leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FRSH and BYND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 134.2x BOF's $11M. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOF's -49.8%. On growth, BOF holds the edge at +47.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $871M | $1.4B | $1.5B | $265M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $41M | $231M | -$430M | -$187M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $180M | $91M | -$544M | $244M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $254M | $174M | $5M | -$134M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +85.0% | +34.0% | +20.0% | +3.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -41.0% | +1.8% | +14.4% | -31.8% | -82.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -49.8% | +20.7% | +6.3% | -36.1% | +92.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -71.0% | +29.2% | +12.0% | +0.3% | -50.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.6% | +16.5% | -0.3% | -6.7% | -15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.3% | — | -31.6% | -11.3% | +90.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, SMPL trades at a 15% valuation discount to FRSH's 14.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMPL's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRSH's 27.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $2.5B | $1.2B | $84M | $414M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $48M | $1.9B | $1.4B | $808M | $714M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.20x | 14.33x | 12.20x | -0.13x | -0.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.87x | 7.45x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.13x | 5.97x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.55x | 2.98x | 0.86x | 0.05x | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.49x | 2.57x | 0.70x | 0.14x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.18x | 7.86x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FRSH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRSH delivers a 18.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-165 for HAIN. FRSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOF's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRSH scores 7/9 vs BOF's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -109.2% | +18.5% | +5.2% | -164.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.1% | +11.9% | +3.7% | -36.8% | +39.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -58.5% | +2.0% | +8.1% | -23.7% | -44.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -122.2% | +1.2% | +9.4% | -29.2% | -40.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.45x | 0.06x | 0.17x | 1.64x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$566M | $206M | $725M | $300M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $632M | $98M | $54M | $208M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $67M | $304M | $779M | $508M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.59x | — | 6.77x | -8.60x | -11.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOF five years ago would be worth $7,878 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $81 for BYND. Over the past 12 months, BOF leads with a +80.8% total return vs BYND's -64.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOF at -7.6% vs HAIN's -65.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.7% | -22.2% | -36.4% | -29.8% | +1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.8% | -36.5% | -64.8% | -49.2% | -64.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.2% | -33.0% | -67.8% | -95.8% | -93.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.2% | -81.0% | -64.3% | -98.2% | -99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.2% | -81.0% | +3.7% | -98.5% | -98.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.6% | -12.5% | -31.5% | -65.3% | -59.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOF and SMPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BOF currently trades 70.5% from its 52-week high vs BYND's 11.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.71x | 1.15x | 0.38x | 2.12x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.95 | $16.14 | $36.92 | $2.22 | $7.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.65 | $6.79 | $10.21 | $0.55 | $0.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.5% | +55.9% | +33.7% | +33.2% | +11.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.4 | 57.4 | 42.9 | 47.8 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 65K | 7.8M | 2.8M | 1.2M | 59.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FRSH as "Buy", SMPL as "Buy", HAIN as "Hold", BYND as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply 4889.9% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 26.6% for FRSH (target: $11).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.43 | $20.17 | $1.17 | $44.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 24 | 44 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +15.5% | +4.1% | +1.7% | 0.0% |
SMPL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). FRSH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
BOF vs FRSH vs SMPL vs HAIN vs BYND: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOF or FRSH or SMPL or HAIN or BYND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BranchOut Food Inc.
(BOF) is the stronger pick with 130. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOF or FRSH or SMPL or HAIN or BYND?
On trailing P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus Freshworks Inc. at 14. 3x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOF or FRSH or SMPL or HAIN or BYND?
Over the past 5 years, BranchOut Food Inc.
(BOF) delivered a total return of -21. 2%, compared to -99. 2% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMPL returned +3. 7% versus BYND's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOF or FRSH or SMPL or HAIN or BYND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning HAIN is approximately 460% more volatile than SMPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 3% for BranchOut Food Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOF or FRSH or SMPL or HAIN or BYND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BranchOut Food Inc.
(BOF) is pulling ahead at 130. 6% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freshworks Inc. grew EPS 296. 9% year-over-year, compared to -601. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOF leads at 108. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOF or FRSH or SMPL or HAIN or BYND?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -72. 9% for BranchOut Food Inc. — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -84. 7% for BYND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRSH leads at 85. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOF or FRSH or SMPL or HAIN or BYND more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7.
5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for Freshworks Inc. — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 4889. 9% to $44. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOF or FRSH or SMPL or HAIN or BYND?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BOF or FRSH or SMPL or HAIN or BYND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38)). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMPL: +3. 7%, HAIN: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOF and FRSH and SMPL and HAIN and BYND?
These companies operate in different sectors (BOF (Consumer Defensive) and FRSH (Technology) and SMPL (Consumer Defensive) and HAIN (Consumer Defensive) and BYND (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BOF is a small-cap high-growth stock; FRSH is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BYND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.