Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BOH vs HBCP vs CVBF vs FIS vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
BOH vs HBCP vs CVBF vs FIS vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $3.18B | $512M | $2.78B | $24.47B | $10.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.03B | $209M | $643M | $10.89B | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $184M | $46M | $209M | $382M | $519M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 70.5% | 79.9% | 38.1% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.2% | 27.7% | 43.8% | 17.5% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 11.1x | 14.2x | 7.5x | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $747M | $58M | $991M | $4.01B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $764M | $142M | $108M | $599M | $102M |
BOH vs HBCP vs CVBF vs FIS vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of Hawaii Corp… (BOH) | 100 | 124.2 | +24.2% |
| Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) | 100 | 275.3 | +175.3% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOH vs HBCP vs CVBF vs FIS vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, BOH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HBCP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 163.2% 10Y total return vs JKHY's 94.9%
- NIM 3.8% vs BOH's 2.0%
- +33.3% vs FIS's -35.3%
CVBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 4.0%
- 32.5% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.31 vs CVBF's 4.48
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.16
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.27x
- 7.2% revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
- Beta 0.28 vs BOH's 0.98
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.5% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs BOH's 0.98 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.3% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs BOH's 0.8%, ROIC 21.0% vs 6.4% |
BOH vs HBCP vs CVBF vs FIS vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BOH vs HBCP vs CVBF vs FIS vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVBF leads 1 • JKHY leads 1 • BOH leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 52.1x HBCP's $209M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $209M | $643M | $10.9B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $294M | $60M | $294M | $3.8B | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $184M | $46M | $209M | $382M | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $235M | $44M | $217M | $2.8B | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.3% | +70.5% | +79.9% | +38.1% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +27.7% | +43.8% | +17.5% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +22.0% | +32.5% | +3.5% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +21.2% | +33.8% | +26.1% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +8.2% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.0% | +20.7% | +11.1% | +92.3% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
HBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, HBCP trades at a 82% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HBCP offers better value at 0.72x vs CVBF's 4.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $512M | $2.8B | $24.5B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $428M | $3.7B | $27.9B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.08x | 11.14x | 13.49x | 63.00x | 23.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.28x | 11.07x | 14.24x | 7.54x | 21.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.72x | 4.25x | 2.58x | 2.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.78x | 7.38x | 13.02x | 7.66x | 13.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.09x | 2.45x | 4.33x | 2.29x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.90x | 1.18x | 1.21x | 1.76x | 5.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.83x | 11.54x | 12.81x | 9.97x | 17.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. HBCP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOH's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HBCP scores 9/9 vs BOH's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.3% | +11.0% | +9.3% | +2.7% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.3% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.4% | +7.7% | +6.8% | +6.0% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.4% | +5.7% | +9.3% | +6.6% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.13x | 0.43x | 0.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | -$84M | $883M | $3.4B | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $764M | $142M | $108M | $599M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $747M | $58M | $991M | $4.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | 0.96x | 2.12x | 4.64x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HBCP five years ago would be worth $18,301 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, HBCP leads with a +33.3% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBCP at 32.7% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.8% | +14.9% | +10.9% | -27.3% | -17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +33.3% | +13.1% | -35.3% | -13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.1% | +133.5% | +94.0% | -6.6% | -1.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.6% | +83.0% | +12.2% | -63.2% | +0.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.2% | +163.2% | +67.6% | -13.2% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.1% | +32.7% | +24.7% | -2.2% | -0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HBCP and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOH's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBCP currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.83x | 0.94x | 0.76x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.73 | $65.99 | $21.48 | $82.74 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.36 | $47.96 | $17.95 | $43.30 | $141.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +99.1% | +95.5% | +57.1% | +75.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 59.4 | 57.9 | 43.3 | 28.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 401K | 120K | 1.6M | 5.5M | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BOH as "Hold", HBCP as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -23.5% for HBCP (target: $50). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs JKHY's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $79.67 | $50.00 | $24.75 | $67.38 | $203.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 3 | 16 | 37 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +0.1% | +4.0% | +3.5% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.83 | $0.05 | $0.82 | $1.63 | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +2.8% | +2.9% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
HBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
BOH vs HBCP vs CVBF vs FIS vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOH or HBCP or CVBF or FIS or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOH or HBCP or CVBF or FIS or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancorp, Inc.
(HBCP) is the cheapest at 11. 1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOH or HBCP or CVBF or FIS or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, Home Bancorp, Inc.
(HBCP) delivered a total return of +83. 0%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HBCP returned +163. 2% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOH or HBCP or CVBF or FIS or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Bank of Hawaii Corporation's 0. 98β — meaning BOH is approximately 244% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 45% for Bank of Hawaii Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOH or HBCP or CVBF or FIS or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 28. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOH or HBCP or CVBF or FIS or JKHY?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOH or HBCP or CVBF or FIS or JKHY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOH or HBCP or CVBF or FIS or JKHY?
In this comparison, CVBF (4.
0% yield), BOH (3. 5% yield), FIS (3. 5% yield), JKHY (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. HBCP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BOH or HBCP or CVBF or FIS or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, HBCP: +163. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOH and HBCP and CVBF and FIS and JKHY?
These companies operate in different sectors (BOH (Financial Services) and HBCP (Financial Services) and CVBF (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BOH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BOH, CVBF, FIS, JKHY pay a dividend while HBCP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.