BOKF vs ICE

For growth investors, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the stronger pick with 10.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 5% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the cheapest at 16.

4x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, BOK Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. wins at 2. 19x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x.

Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +59.

4%, compared to +43. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +225. 3% versus BOKF's +168. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning BOKF is approximately 215% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is pulling ahead at 10.

4% versus 7. 5% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for BOK Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICE leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 19x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 25. 3% to $195. 71.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 1. 2% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 2% yield, +225. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +225. 3%, BOKF: +168. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.