Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BOOT vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
BOOT vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $4.97B | $2.66B | $3.60B | $2.82B | $6.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.92B | $1.28B | $5.27B | $5.50B | $6.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $171M | $206M | $507M | $192M | $465M |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | 48.9% | 58.6% | 33.0% | 36.0% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | 20.1% | 13.4% | 6.0% | 9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 22.3x | 12.9x | 7.9x | 12.1x | 13.6x |
| Total Debt | $563M | $326M | $1.17B | $1.73B | $1.23B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $267M | $760M | $239M | $369M |
BOOT vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boot Barn Holdings,… (BOOT) | 100 | 760.2 | +660.2% |
| The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) | 100 | 372.2 | +272.2% |
| Abercrombie & Fitch… (ANF) | 100 | 671.0 | +571.0% |
| American Eagle Outf… (AEO) | 100 | 182.1 | +82.1% |
| Urban Outfitters, I… (URBN) | 100 | 422.1 | +322.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOOT vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 22.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 19.6% 10Y total return vs ANF's 219.7%
- 14.6% revenue growth vs BKE's -3.4%
BKE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 77.0%, current ratio 2.05x
- Beta 0.89, yield 7.5%, current ratio 2.05x
- 16.1% margin vs AEO's 3.5%
ANF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 12.1x)
AEO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
URBN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.06 vs BKE's 1.01
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% revenue growth vs BKE's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs AEO's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs AEO's 2.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.5% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.4% vs ANF's +12.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.6% ROA vs AEO's 4.8%, ROIC 38.4% vs 8.1% |
BOOT vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BOOT vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKE leads in 3 of 6 categories
ANF leads 1 • AEO leads 1 • BOOT leads 0 • URBN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URBN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.2B annually — 4.8x BKE's $1.3B. BKE is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AEO's 3.5%. On growth, BOOT holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $1.3B | $5.3B | $5.5B | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $297M | $282M | $862M | $546M | $614M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $171M | $206M | $507M | $192M | $465M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$141M | $215M | $378M | $25M | $445M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +48.9% | +58.6% | +33.0% | +36.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +20.1% | +13.4% | +6.0% | +9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +16.1% | +9.6% | +3.5% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +16.8% | +7.2% | +0.5% | +7.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.7% | +9.3% | +5.4% | +9.7% | +10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.2% | +9.1% | +3.1% | -7.4% | -18.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ANF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, ANF trades at a 73% valuation discount to BOOT's 27.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), URBN offers better value at 0.06x vs BKE's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $2.7B | $3.6B | $2.8B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $2.7B | $4.0B | $4.3B | $7.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.78x | 13.46x | 7.51x | 15.27x | 13.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.25x | 12.88x | 7.92x | 12.09x | 13.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.95x | 1.06x | — | — | 0.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.10x | 10.31x | 4.68x | 7.99x | 9.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.60x | 2.18x | 0.68x | 0.51x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.44x | 6.22x | 2.68x | 1.73x | 2.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.31x | 9.52x | — | 14.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKE delivers a 44.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $12 for AEO. URBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEO's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), URBN scores 8/9 vs AEO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +44.4% | +38.5% | +12.1% | +16.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | +20.6% | +15.1% | +4.8% | +9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.1% | +38.4% | +31.4% | +8.1% | +13.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.7% | +35.3% | +30.5% | +10.7% | +16.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 0.77x | 0.82x | 1.02x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $493M | $59M | $409M | $1.5B | $856M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $267M | $760M | $239M | $369M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $563M | $326M | $1.2B | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 159.63x | — | 302.38x | 75.18x | 2531.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BOOT and BKE and ANF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOOT five years ago would be worth $21,899 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,188 for AEO. Over the past 12 months, BKE leads with a +57.4% total return vs ANF's +12.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANF at 49.9% vs AEO's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.5% | +4.1% | -36.6% | -35.9% | -6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.7% | +57.4% | +12.7% | +53.4% | +36.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.9% | +93.6% | +237.1% | +34.4% | +149.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.0% | +63.6% | +92.7% | -48.1% | +78.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1960.2% | +225.7% | +219.7% | +45.6% | +143.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.6% | +24.6% | +49.9% | +10.4% | +35.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKE is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEO's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BKE currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs AEO's 58.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 0.90x | 1.40x | 2.07x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $210.25 | $61.69 | $133.11 | $28.46 | $84.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $110.54 | $35.60 | $65.45 | $9.27 | $51.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.7% | +84.9% | +59.0% | +58.5% | +83.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.0 | 52.5 | 33.0 | 40.8 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 616K | 395K | 1.2M | 5.2M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
AEO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BOOT as "Buy", BKE as "Hold", ANF as "Hold", AEO as "Hold", URBN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for AEO (target: $25) vs 1.2% for BKE (target: $53). BKE is the only dividend payer here at 7.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $231.50 | $53.00 | $117.00 | $24.83 | $89.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 20 | 55 | 52 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.5% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.94 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +12.5% | 0.0% | +5.5% |
BKE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ANF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BOOT vs BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs URBN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOOT or BKE or ANF or AEO or URBN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for The Buckle, Inc. (BKE). Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (7. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOOT or BKE or ANF or AEO or URBN?
On trailing P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. at 27. 8x. On forward P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is actually cheaper at 7. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Urban Outfitters, Inc. wins at 0. 06x versus The Buckle, Inc. 's 1. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOOT or BKE or ANF or AEO or URBN?
Over the past 5 years, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) delivered a total return of +119. 0%, compared to -48. 1% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (AEO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOOT returned +1959% versus AEO's +45. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOOT or BKE or ANF or AEO or URBN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. 's 2. 07β — meaning AEO is approximately 130% more volatile than BKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 102% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOOT or BKE or ANF or AEO or URBN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus -3. 4% for The Buckle, Inc. (BKE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 22. 5% year-over-year, compared to -35. 1% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANF leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOOT or BKE or ANF or AEO or URBN?
The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus 3. 5% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKE leads at 19. 8% versus 6. 0% for AEO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANF leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOOT or BKE or ANF or AEO or URBN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 06x versus The Buckle, Inc. 's 1. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 22. 3x for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AEO: 49. 2% to $24. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOOT or BKE or ANF or AEO or URBN?
In this comparison, BKE (7.
5% yield) pays a dividend. BOOT, ANF, AEO, URBN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BOOT or BKE or ANF or AEO or URBN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 7. 5% yield, +225. 9% 10Y return). American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (AEO) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKE: +225. 9%, AEO: +45. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOOT and BKE and ANF and AEO and URBN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BOOT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BKE is a small-cap deep-value stock; ANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; AEO is a small-cap deep-value stock; URBN is a small-cap deep-value stock. BKE pays a dividend while BOOT, ANF, AEO, URBN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.