Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BPYPO vs BXP vs SPG vs SLG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
REIT - Retail
REIT - Office
BPYPO vs BXP vs SPG vs SLG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Office | REIT - Retail | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $5.44B | $9.43B | $65.50B | $3.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.20B | $3.48B | $6.36B | $981M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-350M | $277M | $4.61B | $-88M |
| Gross Margin | 54.3% | 60.6% | 85.7% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | 42.3% | 49.9% | 42.7% |
| Forward P/E | 6.7x | 35.7x | 30.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $54.28B | $17.36B | $29.94B | $7.91B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.21B | $1.48B | $823M | $336M |
BPYPO vs BXP vs SPG vs SLG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Property… (BPYPO) | 100 | 77.4 | -22.6% |
| BXP, Inc. (BXP) | 100 | 69.2 | -30.8% |
| Simon Property Grou… (SPG) | 100 | 349.1 | +249.1% |
| SL Green Realty Cor… (SLG) | 100 | 101.3 | +1.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BPYPO vs BXP vs SPG vs SLG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BPYPO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 9.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, current ratio 0.37x
- Beta 0.20, yield 9.1%, current ratio 0.37x
- Better valuation composite
BXP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SPG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 94.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- 28.9% 10Y total return vs BPYPO's 4.1%
- 72.5% margin vs SLG's -9.0%
- +30.1% vs SLG's -13.3%
SLG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 42.0% FFO/revenue growth vs BPYPO's -3.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.0% FFO/revenue growth vs BPYPO's -3.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 72.5% margin vs SLG's -9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs SLG's 1.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.1% yield, vs BXP's 6.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.1% vs SLG's -13.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs SLG's -0.8%, ROIC 7.6% vs 1.1% |
BPYPO vs BXP vs SPG vs SLG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BPYPO vs BXP vs SPG vs SLG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPG leads in 3 of 6 categories
BPYPO leads 1 • BXP leads 0 • SLG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BPYPO is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 7.3x SLG's $981M. SPG is the more profitable business, keeping 72.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLG's -9.0%. On growth, SLG holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.2B | $3.5B | $6.4B | $981M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.9B | $2.4B | $4.7B | $678M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$350M | $277M | $4.6B | -$88M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$359M | $690M | $2.3B | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.3% | +60.6% | +85.7% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +42.3% | +49.9% | +42.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +8.0% | +72.5% | -9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.0% | +19.8% | +35.4% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.0% | +2.2% | +13.2% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +2.1% | +3.6% | -13.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BPYPO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, SPG trades at a 58% valuation discount to BXP's 34.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BXP's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLG's 26.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $9.4B | $65.5B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $57.5B | $25.3B | $94.6B | $10.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.80x | 34.17x | 14.24x | -28.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.67x | 35.65x | 30.29x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.45x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.73x | 8.89x | 20.31x | 26.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.60x | 2.71x | 10.29x | 3.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.14x | 1.23x | 9.79x | 0.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.84x | 13.68x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG delivers a 68.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SLG. BPYPO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPG's 4.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BPYPO scores 6/9 vs SLG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.8% | +3.6% | +68.8% | -2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.4% | +1.1% | +11.4% | -0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +6.1% | +7.6% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +7.8% | +9.1% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.42x | 2.26x | 4.47x | 1.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $52.1B | $15.9B | $29.1B | $7.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.2B | $1.5B | $823M | $336M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54.3B | $17.4B | $29.9B | $7.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.73x | 1.59x | 3.26x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPG five years ago would be worth $19,142 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,232 for BXP. Over the past 12 months, SPG leads with a +30.1% total return vs SLG's -13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLG at 34.8% vs BXP's 11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.7% | -11.3% | +10.7% | -2.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.7% | -2.4% | +30.1% | -13.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.3% | +38.2% | +109.2% | +144.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.0% | -27.7% | +91.4% | -15.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.1% | -27.8% | +28.9% | -26.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.3% | +11.4% | +27.9% | +34.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BPYPO and SPG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BPYPO is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLG's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPG currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs SLG's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.96x | 0.61x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.26 | $79.33 | $208.28 | $66.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.87 | $49.72 | $155.44 | $34.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +75.0% | +96.7% | +67.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 63.7 | 61.2 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 31K | 2.4M | 1.4M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BPYPO and SPG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BPYPO as "Buy", BXP as "Buy", SPG as "Hold", SLG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for BXP (target: $72) vs -2.2% for SPG (target: $197). For income investors, BPYPO offers the higher dividend yield at 9.12% vs BXP's 6.81%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $72.10 | $197.00 | $50.46 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 42 | 37 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.1% | +6.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.41 | $4.05 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SPG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BPYPO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BPYPO vs BXP vs SPG vs SLG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BPYPO or BXP or SPG or SLG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) is the stronger pick with 42. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Brookfield Property Partners L. P. (BPYPO). Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (30. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Property Partners L. P. (BPYPO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BPYPO or BXP or SPG or SLG?
On trailing P/E, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus BXP, Inc. at 34. 2x. On forward P/E, Brookfield Property Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 6. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BPYPO or BXP or SPG or SLG?
Over the past 5 years, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) delivered a total return of +91. 4%, compared to -27. 7% for BXP, Inc. (BXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPG returned +28. 9% versus BXP's -27. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BPYPO or BXP or SPG or SLG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Property Partners L.
P. (BPYPO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus SL Green Realty Corp. 's 1. 20β — meaning SLG is approximately 502% more volatile than BPYPO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield Property Partners L. P. (BPYPO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 142% versus 4% for Simon Property Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BPYPO or BXP or SPG or SLG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) is pulling ahead at 42. 0% versus -3. 9% for Brookfield Property Partners L. P. (BPYPO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BXP, Inc. grew EPS 1833% year-over-year, compared to -21. 2% for SL Green Realty Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BPYPO leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BPYPO or BXP or SPG or SLG?
Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 5% net margin versus -8. 8% for SL Green Realty Corp. — meaning it keeps 72. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BXP leads at 55. 7% versus 15. 4% for SLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPG leads at 85. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BPYPO or BXP or SPG or SLG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brookfield Property Partners L.
P. (BPYPO) trades at 6. 7x forward P/E versus 35. 7x for BXP, Inc. — 29. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BXP: 21. 3% to $72. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — BPYPO or BXP or SPG or SLG?
In this comparison, BPYPO (9.
1% yield), BXP (6. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SPG, SLG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BPYPO or BXP or SPG or SLG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brookfield Property Partners L.
P. (BPYPO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 9. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BPYPO: +4. 1%, SLG: -26. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BPYPO and BXP and SPG and SLG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BPYPO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BXP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SPG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SLG is a small-cap high-growth stock. BPYPO, BXP pay a dividend while SPG, SLG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.