Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BRBR vs VITL vs FRPT vs SMPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
BRBR vs VITL vs FRPT vs SMPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $1.22B | $426M | $2.74B | $1.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.33B | $784M | $1.14B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $81M | $48M | $200M | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 30.2% | 35.2% | 38.9% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 8.2% | 8.8% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | 5.5x | 10.4x | 41.1x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.11B | $53M | $560M | $304M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $89M | $49M | $278M | $98M |
BRBR vs VITL vs FRPT vs SMPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BellRing Brands, In… (BRBR) | 100 | 52.6 | -47.4% |
| Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) | 100 | 27.0 | -73.0% |
| Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) | 100 | 58.2 | -41.8% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 51.7 | -48.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRBR vs VITL vs FRPT vs SMPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRBR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 7.5x)
VITL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 0.31
- Rev growth 25.3%, EPS growth 22.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 15.2%, current ratio 2.16x
- PEG 0.26 vs SMPL's 0.31
FRPT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs SMPL's 3.7%
- 17.6% margin vs BRBR's 3.5%
- -31.1% vs BRBR's -83.3%
- 11.4% ROA vs SMPL's 3.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs 8.1%
SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.38, current ratio 3.64x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.3% revenue growth vs SMPL's 9.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 7.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs BRBR's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs BRBR's 0.97 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -31.1% vs BRBR's -83.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs SMPL's 3.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs 8.1% |
BRBR vs VITL vs FRPT vs SMPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BRBR vs VITL vs FRPT vs SMPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FRPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
BRBR leads 1 • VITL leads 1 • SMPL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRBR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 3.0x VITL's $784M. FRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRBR's 3.5%. On growth, VITL holds the edge at +15.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $784M | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $289M | $78M | $165M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $81M | $48M | $200M | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $192M | -$90M | $223M | $174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.2% | +35.2% | +38.9% | +34.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +8.2% | +8.8% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +6.1% | +17.6% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | -11.4% | +19.6% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.8% | +15.4% | +13.1% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.6% | -108.1% | +4.5% | -31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BRBR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.2x trailing earnings, BRBR trades at a 71% valuation discount to FRPT's 21.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VITL offers better value at 0.17x vs SMPL's 0.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $426M | $2.7B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $431M | $3.0B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.22x | 6.61x | 21.16x | 12.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.49x | 10.38x | 41.11x | 7.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.17x | — | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.96x | 4.22x | 16.62x | 5.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.52x | 0.56x | 2.49x | 0.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.25x | 2.59x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.75x | — | 221.45x | 7.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VITL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRPT delivers a 17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $5 for SMPL. VITL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRPT's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRPT scores 6/9 vs VITL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +14.5% | +17.0% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | +10.0% | +11.4% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +47.3% | +26.9% | +5.3% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +55.3% | +26.1% | +6.0% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.15x | 0.46x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $5M | $282M | $206M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $89M | $49M | $278M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $53M | $560M | $304M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.91x | 39.83x | 13.29x | 6.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VITL five years ago would be worth $4,564 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,165 for FRPT. Over the past 12 months, FRPT leads with a -31.1% total return vs BRBR's -83.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRPT at -6.2% vs BRBR's -34.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -59.9% | -68.1% | -7.1% | -36.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -83.3% | -73.5% | -31.1% | -64.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.9% | -38.2% | -17.4% | -67.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | -54.4% | -68.4% | -64.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.7% | -73.0% | +517.3% | +3.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.5% | -14.8% | -6.2% | -31.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VITL and FRPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VITL is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BRBR's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRPT currently trades 62.2% from its 52-week high vs BRBR's 15.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 0.31x | 0.91x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.00 | $53.13 | $89.80 | $36.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.21 | $8.40 | $46.76 | $10.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.6% | +17.9% | +62.2% | +33.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.3 | 38.9 | 29.1 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 3.3M | 1.5M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BRBR as "Buy", VITL as "Buy", FRPT as "Buy", SMPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 316.3% upside for VITL (target: $40) vs 31.4% for FRPT (target: $73).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.10 | $39.63 | $73.42 | $20.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 15 | 29 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +39.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
FRPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BRBR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BRBR vs VITL vs FRPT vs SMPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRBR or VITL or FRPT or SMPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the stronger pick with 25. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 0% for The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL). BellRing Brands, Inc. (BRBR) offers the better valuation at 6. 2x trailing P/E (5. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BellRing Brands, Inc. (BRBR) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRBR or VITL or FRPT or SMPL?
On trailing P/E, BellRing Brands, Inc.
(BRBR) is the cheapest at 6. 2x versus Freshpet, Inc. at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, BellRing Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Vital Farms, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus The Simply Good Foods Company's 0. 31x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRBR or VITL or FRPT or SMPL?
Over the past 5 years, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) delivered a total return of -54. 4%, compared to -68. 4% for Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRPT returned +517. 3% versus VITL's -73. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRBR or VITL or FRPT or SMPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus BellRing Brands, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning BRBR is approximately 211% more volatile than VITL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 46% for Freshpet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BRBR or VITL or FRPT or SMPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is pulling ahead at 25. 3% versus 9. 0% for The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freshpet, Inc. grew EPS 183. 9% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for The Simply Good Foods Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, VITL leads at 28. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BRBR or VITL or FRPT or SMPL?
Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus 7. 1% for The Simply Good Foods Company — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRBR leads at 15. 4% versus 8. 6% for FRPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPT leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BRBR or VITL or FRPT or SMPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus The Simply Good Foods Company's 0. 31x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, BellRing Brands, Inc. (BRBR) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 41. 1x for Freshpet, Inc. — 35. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VITL: 316. 3% to $39. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — BRBR or VITL or FRPT or SMPL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BRBR or VITL or FRPT or SMPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VITL: -73. 0%, BRBR: -36. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BRBR and VITL and FRPT and SMPL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BRBR is a small-cap high-growth stock; VITL is a small-cap high-growth stock; FRPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.