Luxury Goods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BRLT vs LOVE vs CPRI vs SIG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Luxury Goods
Luxury Goods
BRLT vs LOVE vs CPRI vs SIG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Luxury Goods | Luxury Goods |
| Market Cap | $223M | $228M | $2.23B | $3.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $443M | $690M | $3.71B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $13M | $-504M | $0.00 |
| Gross Margin | 56.5% | 57.7% | 61.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | 6.3% | -1.8% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.7x | 13.4x | 9.3x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $183M | $3.10B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $79M | $84M | $166M | — |
BRLT vs LOVE vs CPRI vs SIG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brilliant Earth Gro… (BRLT) | 100 | 10.5 | -89.5% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 23.6 | -76.4% |
| Capri Holdings Limi… (CPRI) | 100 | 38.6 | -61.4% |
| Signet Jewelers Lim… (SIG) | 100 | 111.4 | +11.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRLT vs LOVE vs CPRI vs SIG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRLT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.20, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 47.8%, current ratio 1.61x
- Beta 1.20, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.61x
- 3.6% revenue growth vs SIG's -100.0%
LOVE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth -2.8%, EPS growth -52.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- 1.9% margin vs CPRI's -13.6%
- 2.6% ROA vs CPRI's -15.1%, ROIC 3.3% vs -13.6%
CPRI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SIG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -8.9% 10Y total return vs LOVE's -34.9%
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 13.4x)
- +42.9% vs LOVE's -23.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs SIG's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 13.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs CPRI's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs CPRI's 2.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.9% vs LOVE's -23.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs CPRI's -15.1%, ROIC 3.3% vs -13.6% |
BRLT vs LOVE vs CPRI vs SIG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BRLT vs LOVE vs CPRI vs SIG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LOVE leads in 2 of 6 categories
SIG leads 2 • CPRI leads 1 • BRLT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRI and SIG operate at a comparable scale, with $3.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. LOVE is the more profitable business, keeping 1.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPRI's -13.6%. On growth, BRLT holds the edge at +6.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $443M | $690M | $3.7B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $58M | $72M | $0 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $13M | -$504M | $0 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$11M | $491M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.5% | +57.7% | +61.4% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +6.3% | -1.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +1.9% | -13.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | -1.5% | +13.2% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | +2.5% | -18.7% | -2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -18.4% | +120.8% | -146.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LOVE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LOVE's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BRLT's 120.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $223M | $228M | $2.2B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $182M | $327M | $5.2B | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.64x | 22.64x | -1.87x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.68x | 13.36x | 9.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 120.80x | 11.54x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 0.34x | 0.50x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.61x | 1.21x | 5.94x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.76x | 13.06x | 14.55x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOVE leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOVE delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-5 for CPRI. BRLT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPRI's 8.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOVE scores 5/9 vs SIG's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.0% | +6.5% | -4.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.5% | +2.6% | -15.1% | — |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.7% | +3.3% | -13.6% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.4% | +3.6% | -17.0% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.85x | 8.34x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$41M | $99M | $2.9B | $0 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $79M | $84M | $166M | — |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $183M | $3.1B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 51.57x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SIG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SIG five years ago would be worth $14,312 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $970 for BRLT. Over the past 12 months, SIG leads with a +42.9% total return vs LOVE's -23.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SIG at 9.1% vs BRLT's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.2% | +8.2% | -23.4% | +3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.4% | -23.5% | +18.4% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.2% | -40.1% | -50.5% | +30.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -78.4% | -68.6% | +43.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -34.9% | -63.1% | -8.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.2% | -15.7% | -20.9% | +9.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRLT and SIG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRLT is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CPRI's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIG currently trades 79.8% from its 52-week high vs BRLT's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.33x | 2.03x | 1.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.10 | $21.90 | $28.27 | $110.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.21 | $10.33 | $15.37 | $61.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.5% | +71.3% | +66.1% | +79.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 53.7 | 47.3 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 56K | 299K | 2.5M | 919K |
Analyst Outlook
SIG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LOVE as "Buy", CPRI as "Hold", SIG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.0% upside for LOVE (target: $23) vs 25.0% for SIG (target: $110). BRLT is the only dividend payer here at 1.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.50 | $25.33 | $110.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 53 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +8.7% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
LOVE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SIG leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
BRLT vs LOVE vs CPRI vs SIG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRLT or LOVE or CPRI or SIG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG). The Lovesac Company (LOVE) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (25. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Lovesac Company (LOVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRLT or LOVE or CPRI or SIG?
On forward P/E, Signet Jewelers Limited is actually cheaper at 9.
3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRLT or LOVE or CPRI or SIG?
Over the past 5 years, Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) delivered a total return of +43.
1%, compared to -90. 3% for Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SIG returned -8. 9% versus BRLT's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRLT or LOVE or CPRI or SIG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Capri Holdings Limited's 2. 03β — meaning CPRI is approximately 69% more volatile than BRLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 8% for Capri Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BRLT or LOVE or CPRI or SIG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -100. 0% for Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Signet Jewelers Limited grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -888. 6% for Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BRLT or LOVE or CPRI or SIG?
The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
7% net margin versus -26. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOVE leads at 2. 0% versus -16. 9% for CPRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPRI leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BRLT or LOVE or CPRI or SIG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) trades at 9.
3x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for The Lovesac Company — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LOVE: 44. 0% to $22. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BRLT or LOVE or CPRI or SIG?
In this comparison, BRLT (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. LOVE, CPRI, SIG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BRLT or LOVE or CPRI or SIG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), 1. 8% yield). Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRLT: -90. 3%, CPRI: -63. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BRLT and LOVE and CPRI and SIG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BRLT pays a dividend while LOVE, CPRI, SIG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.