Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BSET vs HBB vs AMZN vs HD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Specialty Retail
Home Improvement
BSET vs HBB vs AMZN vs HD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Specialty Retail | Home Improvement |
| Market Cap | $123M | $276M | $2.92T | $320.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $331M | $595M | $742.78B | $164.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $28M | $90.80B | $14.16B |
| Gross Margin | 56.3% | 26.8% | 50.6% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 6.6% | 11.5% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 12.8x | 34.8x | 21.5x |
| Total Debt | $89M | $42M | $152.99B | $19.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $47M | $86.81B | $1.39B |
BSET vs HBB vs AMZN vs HD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bassett Furniture I… (BSET) | 100 | 222.7 | +122.7% |
| Hamilton Beach Bran… (HBB) | 100 | 215.1 | +115.1% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
| The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) | 100 | 129.8 | +29.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSET vs HBB vs AMZN vs HD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSET has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 5.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 53.7%, current ratio 1.89x
- Beta 0.35, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.89x
- Beta 0.35 vs HBB's 1.95
HBB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (12.8x vs 21.5x)
- +50.9% vs BSET's -13.3%
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs HD's 184.0%
- PEG 1.24 vs HD's 6.01
- 12.4% revenue growth vs HBB's -7.3%
HD is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 13.5% ROA vs BSET's 2.4%, ROIC 32.1% vs 2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs HBB's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 21.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs BSET's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs HBB's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | 5.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HD's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.9% vs BSET's -13.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.5% ROA vs BSET's 2.4%, ROIC 32.1% vs 2.6% |
BSET vs HBB vs AMZN vs HD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BSET vs HBB vs AMZN vs HD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HD leads in 1 of 6 categories
AMZN leads 1 • BSET leads 0 • HBB leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BSET and AMZN and HD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 2244.4x BSET's $331M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BSET's 2.3%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $331M | $595M | $742.8B | $164.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15M | $44M | $155.9B | $24.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $28M | $90.8B | $14.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $8M | -$2.5B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.3% | +26.8% | +50.6% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +6.6% | +11.5% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +4.7% | +12.2% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +1.4% | -0.3% | +7.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | -8.6% | +16.6% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +117.8% | +100.0% | +74.8% | -14.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BSET and HBB each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, HBB trades at a 72% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs HD's 6.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $123M | $276M | $2.92T | $320.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $171M | $270M | $2.98T | $338.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.36x | 10.53x | 37.82x | 22.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.27x | 12.84x | 34.77x | 21.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.35x | 6.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.80x | 6.37x | 20.47x | 14.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.45x | 4.07x | 1.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 1.51x | 7.14x | 25.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.76x | 24.99x | 378.98x | 25.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HD delivers a 110.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $110 in annual profit, vs $5 for BSET. HBB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HD's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSET scores 7/9 vs HD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | +16.2% | +23.3% | +110.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +7.4% | +11.5% | +13.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +14.0% | +14.7% | +32.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +13.7% | +15.3% | +29.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.23x | 0.37x | 1.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $47M | -$5M | $66.2B | $17.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $47M | $86.8B | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $89M | $42M | $153.0B | $19.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 74.23x | 55.74x | 39.96x | 8.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,339 for BSET. Over the past 12 months, HBB leads with a +50.9% total return vs BSET's -13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs BSET's 4.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.9% | +29.1% | +19.7% | -6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.3% | +50.9% | +43.7% | -8.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.8% | +114.9% | +156.2% | +21.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.6% | +1.6% | +64.8% | +7.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.8% | -22.6% | +697.8% | +184.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.7% | +29.0% | +36.8% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BSET and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSET is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBB's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs BSET's 72.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 1.95x | 1.51x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.75 | $21.80 | $278.56 | $426.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.17 | $12.72 | $185.01 | $310.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.2% | +94.2% | +97.3% | +75.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.7 | 54.4 | 81.1 | 43.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 25K | 45.5M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BSET and HD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BSET as "Hold", HBB as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy", HD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.5% upside for HD (target: $408) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). For income investors, BSET offers the higher dividend yield at 5.59% vs HBB's 2.33%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $306.77 | $408.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 1 | 94 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.6% | +2.3% | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 7 | — | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $0.48 | — | $9.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +3.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). AMZN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
BSET vs HBB vs AMZN vs HD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSET or HBB or AMZN or HD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSET or HBB or AMZN or HD?
On trailing P/E, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) is the cheapest at 10.
5x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company is actually cheaper at 12. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 01x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSET or HBB or AMZN or HD?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -46. 6% for Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus BSET's -22. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSET or HBB or AMZN or HD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company's 1. 95β — meaning HBB is approximately 462% more volatile than BSET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 148% for The Home Depot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BSET or HBB or AMZN or HD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -7. 3% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated grew EPS 163. 1% year-over-year, compared to -11. 4% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BSET or HBB or AMZN or HD?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 1. 8% for Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HD leads at 12. 7% versus 2. 3% for BSET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BSET leads at 56. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BSET or HBB or AMZN or HD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 01x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 21. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HD: 26. 5% to $408. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — BSET or HBB or AMZN or HD?
In this comparison, BSET (5.
6% yield), HD (2. 8% yield), HBB (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. AMZN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BSET or HBB or AMZN or HD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (BSET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
35), 5. 6% yield). Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSET: -22. 8%, HBB: -22. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BSET and HBB and AMZN and HD?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BSET is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HBB is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; HD is a large-cap quality compounder stock. BSET, HBB, HD pay a dividend while AMZN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.