Restaurants
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BTBD vs DENN vs ARKR vs KRUS vs FWRG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
BTBD vs DENN vs ARKR vs KRUS vs FWRG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $11M | $322M | $27M | $671M | $737M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14M | $457M | $162M | $292M | $1.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-936K | $10M | $-14M | $-4M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 22.2% | 43.8% | 6.9% | 11.0% | 35.1% |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | 8.4% | -0.5% | -2.4% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.0x | — | — | 60.7x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $408M | $86M | $170M | $740M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $2M | $11M | $47M | $21M |
BTBD vs DENN vs ARKR vs KRUS vs FWRG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BT Brands, Inc. (BTBD) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 44.9 | -55.1% |
| Ark Restaurants Cor… (ARKR) | 100 | 45.0 | -55.0% |
| Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (KRUS) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| First Watch Restaur… (FWRG) | 100 | 60.0 | -40.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BTBD vs DENN vs ARKR vs KRUS vs FWRG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BTBD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +49.2% vs ARKR's -37.3%
DENN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65
- Lower P/E (15.0x vs 60.7x)
- 2.2% margin vs ARKR's -8.5%
- Beta 0.65 vs BTBD's 2.01
ARKR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
KRUS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.9%, EPS growth 79.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.1%
- 187.1% 10Y total return vs ARKR's -36.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 73.6%, current ratio 1.76x
- Beta 1.36, current ratio 1.76x
FWRG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 20.3% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.3% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 60.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.2% margin vs ARKR's -8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs BTBD's 2.01 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.2% vs ARKR's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs ARKR's -10.5%, ROIC 9.7% vs -2.6% |
BTBD vs DENN vs ARKR vs KRUS vs FWRG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BTBD vs DENN vs ARKR vs KRUS vs FWRG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DENN leads in 2 of 6 categories
KRUS leads 1 • BTBD leads 0 • ARKR leads 0 • FWRG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DENN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FWRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 90.6x BTBD's $14M. DENN is the more profitable business, keeping 2.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARKR's -8.5%. On growth, FWRG holds the edge at +17.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14M | $457M | $162M | $292M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $151,370 | $55M | $2M | $8M | $109M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$935,920 | $10M | -$14M | -$4M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$585,396 | $2M | -$1M | -$28M | -$9M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +43.8% | +6.9% | +11.0% | +35.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +8.4% | -0.5% | -2.4% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | +2.2% | -8.5% | -1.4% | +1.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +0.5% | -0.9% | -9.5% | -0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.4% | +1.3% | -9.4% | +14.0% | +17.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.2% | -89.9% | -71.6% | -196.9% | -2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DENN and ARKR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, DENN trades at a 60% valuation discount to FWRG's 38.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DENN's 12.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRUS's 85.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $322M | $27M | $671M | $737M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $728M | $101M | $793M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.76x | 15.24x | -2.33x | -351.88x | 38.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.02x | — | — | 60.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.10x | — | 85.45x | 13.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 0.71x | 0.16x | 2.37x | 0.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.57x | — | 0.83x | 2.90x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 350.62x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DENN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FWRG delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-42 for ARKR. BTBD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARKR's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DENN scores 7/9 vs KRUS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.1% | — | -41.5% | -1.7% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.8% | +2.0% | -10.5% | -0.9% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.9% | +9.7% | -2.6% | -1.2% | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.5% | +11.9% | -3.4% | -1.4% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | — | 2.67x | 0.74x | 1.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $406M | $74M | $123M | $718M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $2M | $11M | $47M | $21M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $408M | $86M | $170M | $740M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.91x | 1.73x | -21.75x | -50.08x | 1.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRUS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRUS five years ago would be worth $15,779 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,507 for DENN. Over the past 12 months, BTBD leads with a +49.2% total return vs ARKR's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRUS at -4.2% vs ARKR's -21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.4% | +0.6% | +12.0% | +3.8% | -22.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.2% | +39.8% | -37.3% | -6.9% | -25.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.7% | -41.3% | -52.4% | -12.2% | -28.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.3% | -64.9% | -55.9% | +57.8% | -46.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.3% | -42.9% | -36.1% | +187.1% | -46.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.5% | -16.3% | -21.9% | -4.2% | -10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DENN and ARKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARKR is the less volatile stock with a -0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBD's 2.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs BTBD's 31.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.01x | 0.65x | -0.42x | 1.36x | 1.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.60 | $6.26 | $12.60 | $95.98 | $19.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $3.36 | $5.98 | $42.62 | $10.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.4% | +99.8% | +58.7% | +58.7% | +61.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.9 | 66.9 | 53.4 | 43.5 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 0 | 5K | 308K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DENN as "Buy", KRUS as "Buy", FWRG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.0% upside for FWRG (target: $19) vs -4.0% for DENN (target: $6).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | — | $73.40 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | — | 13 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +3.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DENN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KRUS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BTBD vs DENN vs ARKR vs KRUS vs FWRG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BTBD or DENN or ARKR or KRUS or FWRG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.
(FWRG) is the stronger pick with 20. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). Denny's Corporation (DENN) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Denny's Corporation (DENN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BTBD or DENN or ARKR or KRUS or FWRG?
On trailing P/E, Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the cheapest at 15.
2x versus First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Denny's Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BTBD or DENN or ARKR or KRUS or FWRG?
Over the past 5 years, Kura Sushi USA, Inc.
(KRUS) delivered a total return of +57. 8%, compared to -64. 9% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRUS returned +187. 1% versus BTBD's -61. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BTBD or DENN or ARKR or KRUS or FWRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 42β versus BT Brands, Inc. 's 2. 01β — meaning BTBD is approximately -579% more volatile than ARKR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BT Brands, Inc. (BTBD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 58% versus 3% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BTBD or DENN or ARKR or KRUS or FWRG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.
(FWRG) is pulling ahead at 20. 3% versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kura Sushi USA, Inc. grew EPS 79. 7% year-over-year, compared to -194. 4% for Ark Restaurants Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KRUS leads at 26. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BTBD or DENN or ARKR or KRUS or FWRG?
Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
8% net margin versus -15. 6% for BT Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DENN leads at 10. 0% versus -12. 4% for BTBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DENN leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BTBD or DENN or ARKR or KRUS or FWRG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Denny's Corporation (DENN) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 60. 7x for First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. — 45. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRG: 59. 0% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BTBD or DENN or ARKR or KRUS or FWRG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BTBD or DENN or ARKR or KRUS or FWRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 42)). BT Brands, Inc. (BTBD) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARKR: -36. 1%, BTBD: -61. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BTBD and DENN and ARKR and KRUS and FWRG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BTBD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRUS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FWRG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.