Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BWEN vs AMSC vs SHLS vs GEV vs ENPH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Solar
Renewable Utilities
Solar
BWEN vs AMSC vs SHLS vs GEV vs ENPH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Solar | Renewable Utilities | Solar |
| Market Cap | $49M | $2.56B | $1.32B | $281.02B | $4.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $158M | $279M | $536M | $39.38B | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $130M | $34M | $9.38B | $135M |
| Gross Margin | 10.1% | 30.6% | 33.5% | 19.9% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.3% | 4.9% | 11.2% | 3.9% | 6.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 15.4x | 19.4x | 37.6x | 17.6x |
| Total Debt | $28M | $3M | $175M | $0.00 | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $456K | $79M | $7M | $8.85B | $474M |
BWEN vs AMSC vs SHLS vs GEV vs ENPH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) | 100 | 88.7 | -11.3% |
| American Supercondu… (AMSC) | 100 | 393.9 | +293.9% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 70.1 | -29.9% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 764.7 | +664.7% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 29.3 | -70.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWEN vs AMSC vs SHLS vs GEV vs ENPH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 37.6x)
AMSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 143.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs GEV's 8.9%
- 46.7% margin vs BWEN's 3.3%
- 18.1% ROA vs SHLS's 3.7%, ROIC -0.9% vs 5.9%
SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
GEV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs ENPH's 17.4%
- 0.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +157.4% vs ENPH's -18.9%
ENPH is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 1.70 vs AMSC's 2.90
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs GEV's 8.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 37.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.7% margin vs BWEN's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs AMSC's 2.90 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +157.4% vs ENPH's -18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.1% ROA vs SHLS's 3.7%, ROIC -0.9% vs 5.9% |
BWEN vs AMSC vs SHLS vs GEV vs ENPH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BWEN vs AMSC vs SHLS vs GEV vs ENPH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BWEN leads in 1 of 6 categories
GEV leads 1 • AMSC leads 1 • SHLS leads 1 • ENPH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AMSC and SHLS and ENPH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.4B annually — 249.1x BWEN's $158M. AMSC is the more profitable business, keeping 46.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWEN's 3.3%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $158M | $279M | $536M | $39.4B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $18M | $73M | $2.2B | $171M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $130M | $34M | $9.4B | $135M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $16M | -$77M | $3.6B | $145M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +30.6% | +33.5% | +19.9% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +4.9% | +11.2% | +3.9% | +6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +46.7% | +6.3% | +23.8% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | +5.7% | -14.5% | +9.2% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | +21.4% | +74.9% | +16.1% | -20.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.7% | +39.9% | — | +18.2% | -127.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BWEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, BWEN trades at a 97% valuation discount to AMSC's 332.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BWEN's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMSC's 454.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $49M | $2.6B | $1.3B | $281.0B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $77M | $2.5B | $1.5B | $272.2B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.17x | 332.63x | 39.20x | 59.12x | 27.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.37x | 19.40x | 37.62x | 17.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 4.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.36x | 454.16x | 22.83x | 121.45x | 22.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 11.47x | 2.77x | 7.38x | 3.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 10.18x | 2.20x | 23.47x | 4.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 98.78x | — | 75.73x | 48.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $6 for SHLS. AMSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENPH's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSC scores 7/9 vs SHLS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.3% | +24.3% | +5.7% | +79.7% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +18.1% | +3.7% | +15.2% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.4% | -0.9% | +5.9% | +27.9% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | -0.6% | +7.6% | +6.6% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.02x | 0.29x | — | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28M | -$76M | $168M | -$8.8B | $769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $456,000 | $79M | $7M | $8.8B | $474M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28M | $3M | $175M | $0 | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.56x | — | 5.91x | — | 47.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMSC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $79,830 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,724 for SHLS. Over the past 12 months, GEV leads with a +157.4% total return vs ENPH's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMSC at 139.0% vs ENPH's -39.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.7% | +68.5% | -13.8% | +54.0% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.5% | +156.9% | +66.5% | +157.4% | -18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.2% | +1264.6% | -60.2% | +698.3% | -78.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.2% | +255.0% | -72.8% | +698.3% | -71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.3% | +379.0% | -74.7% | +698.3% | +1737.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.1% | +139.0% | -26.5% | +99.9% | -39.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GEV and ENPH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ENPH is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMSC's 2.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEV currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs BWEN's 50.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.71x | 2.90x | 2.08x | 1.76x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.15 | $70.49 | $11.36 | $1181.95 | $54.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.45 | $20.43 | $3.81 | $387.03 | $25.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.8% | +75.5% | +69.0% | +88.5% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 74.0 | 63.2 | 66.5 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 164K | 1.1M | 5.1M | 2.4M | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMSC as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy", GEV as "Buy", ENPH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for SHLS (target: $10) vs 7.1% for GEV (target: $1120).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $61.50 | $9.83 | $1119.95 | $43.48 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 23 | 28 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.0% | +1.2% | +2.8% |
BWEN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). GEV leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
BWEN vs AMSC vs SHLS vs GEV vs ENPH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWEN or AMSC or SHLS or GEV or ENPH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 9% for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWEN or AMSC or SHLS or GEV or ENPH?
On trailing P/E, Broadwind, Inc.
(BWEN) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus American Superconductor Corporation at 332. 6x. On forward P/E, American Superconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWEN or AMSC or SHLS or GEV or ENPH?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +698. 3%, compared to -72. 8% for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1738% versus SHLS's -74. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWEN or AMSC or SHLS or GEV or ENPH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 70β versus American Superconductor Corporation's 2. 90β — meaning AMSC is approximately 71% more volatile than ENPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 114% for Enphase Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWEN or AMSC or SHLS or GEV or ENPH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus 8. 9% for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadwind, Inc. grew EPS 338. 9% year-over-year, compared to 42. 9% for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMSC leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWEN or AMSC or SHLS or GEV or ENPH?
GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 8% net margin versus 2. 7% for American Superconductor Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHLS leads at 11. 9% versus -0. 5% for AMSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENPH leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BWEN or AMSC or SHLS or GEV or ENPH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) trades at 15.
4x forward P/E versus 37. 6x for GE Vernova Inc. — 22. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHLS: 25. 4% to $9. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — BWEN or AMSC or SHLS or GEV or ENPH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BWEN or AMSC or SHLS or GEV or ENPH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1738% 10Y return). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENPH: +1738%, SHLS: -74. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BWEN and AMSC and SHLS and GEV and ENPH?
These companies operate in different sectors (BWEN (Industrials) and AMSC (Industrials) and SHLS (Energy) and GEV (Utilities) and ENPH (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BWEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.