Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BWFG vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
BWFG vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $415M | $1.20B | $2.35B | $522M | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $208M | $376M | $867M | $314M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $93M | $169M | $26M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 51.6% | 63.2% | 72.1% | 50.9% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.3% | 28.4% | 25.3% | 10.9% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 10.9x | 10.8x | 13.3x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $180M | $320M | $327M | $517M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $225M | $370M | $185M | $231M | $599M |
BWFG vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 355.9 | +255.9% |
| Community Trust Ban… (CTBI) | 100 | 201.9 | +101.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| HarborOne Bancorp, … (HONE) | 100 | 151.8 | +51.8% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWFG vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWFG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 175.8% 10Y total return vs CTBI's 133.7%
- PEG 0.22 vs CTBI's 2.25
- +55.7% vs FIS's -35.3%
CTBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 15.2% NII/revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4%
- 22.0% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 1.4% ROA vs HONE's 0.5%, ROIC 7.7% vs 2.3%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.1% vs HONE's 2.2%
HONE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 78.4%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 1.53
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% NII/revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.0% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs HONE's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.7% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs HONE's 0.5%, ROIC 7.7% vs 2.3% |
BWFG vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BWFG vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BWFG leads in 2 of 6 categories
CTBI leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • HONE leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTBI leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 52.5x BWFG's $208M. CTBI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $208M | $376M | $867M | $314M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $53M | $127M | $241M | $37M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $93M | $169M | $26M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $104M | $225M | $46M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.6% | +63.2% | +72.1% | +50.9% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +28.4% | +25.3% | +10.9% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +22.0% | +19.5% | +8.7% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +25.8% | +25.2% | +0.8% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +7.3% | +39.5% | +11.1% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BWFG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, BWFG trades at a 81% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.27x vs CTBI's 2.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $415M | $1.2B | $2.4B | $522M | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $370M | $1.2B | $2.5B | $808M | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.71x | 14.38x | 13.53x | 18.33x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.62x | 10.91x | 10.80x | 13.30x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.27x | 2.97x | 1.92x | 1.23x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.04x | 10.31x | 10.35x | 20.84x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.00x | 3.19x | 2.71x | 1.66x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 1.57x | 1.21x | 0.87x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.90x | 12.37x | 10.75x | 200.70x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BWFG and CTBI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BWFG delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HONE's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CTBI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.2% | +11.2% | +9.5% | +4.6% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +0.5% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.0% | +7.7% | +7.9% | +2.3% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +12.7% | +2.4% | +3.5% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.42x | 0.17x | 0.90x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$45M | -$50M | $142M | $285M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $225M | $370M | $185M | $231M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $180M | $320M | $327M | $517M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.49x | 0.95x | 1.05x | 0.24x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BWFG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWFG five years ago would be worth $19,208 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +55.7% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BWFG at 34.7% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.1% | +18.5% | +9.3% | — | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.7% | +36.4% | +9.0% | +7.9% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.3% | +111.4% | +54.1% | +58.9% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.1% | +66.1% | +29.9% | -5.8% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +175.8% | +133.7% | +102.2% | +88.3% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.7% | +28.3% | +15.5% | +16.7% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BWFG and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HONE's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWFG currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 0.82x | 0.89x | 1.05x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.86 | $68.72 | $46.92 | $14.29 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.26 | $49.61 | $39.20 | $10.57 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +96.5% | +96.1% | +84.7% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 58.3 | 57.3 | 32.5 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 92K | 236K | 0 | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BWFG as "Buy", CTBI as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", HONE as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -8.0% for CTBI (target: $61). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs BWFG's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $61.00 | $46.00 | $14.00 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +2.8% | +3.2% | +2.6% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 10 | 12 | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $1.86 | $1.43 | $0.32 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +4.1% | 0.0% |
BWFG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CTBI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
BWFG vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWFG or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWFG or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWFG or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWFG returned +175. 8% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWFG or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning HONE is approximately 38% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 90% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWFG or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWFG or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS?
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 0% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTBI leads at 28. 4% versus 10. 9% for HONE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BWFG or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — BWFG or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 5% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG).
09Is BWFG or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 1. 5% yield, +175. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BWFG: +175. 8%, HONE: +88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BWFG and CTBI and NBTB and HONE and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (BWFG (Financial Services) and CTBI (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and HONE (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CTBI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; HONE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.