Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BXC vs HD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
BXC vs HD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Home Improvement |
| Market Cap | $461M | $321.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.98B | $164.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $14.16B |
| Gross Margin | 15.0% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | 65.1x | 21.5x |
| Total Debt | $674M | $19.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $386M | $1.39B |
BXC vs HD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlueLinx Holdings I… (BXC) | 100 | 849.0 | +749.0% |
| The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) | 100 | 130.0 | +30.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BXC vs HD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BXC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 7.5% 10Y total return vs HD's 185.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.86, current ratio 4.66x
HD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth -4.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- Beta 0.84, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.2% revenue growth vs BXC's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.5x vs 65.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.6% margin vs BXC's -0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs BXC's 1.86 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.5% vs BXC's -9.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.5% ROA vs BXC's -0.3%, ROIC 32.1% vs 2.9% |
BXC vs HD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BXC vs HD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HD is the larger business by revenue, generating $164.7B annually — 55.3x BXC's $3.0B. HD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BXC's -0.1%. On growth, BXC holds the edge at +3.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $164.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $70M | $24.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $14.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $31M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +7.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -154.5% | -14.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BXC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, HD trades at a 99% valuation discount to BXC's 2122.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BXC's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HD's 14.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $461M | $321.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $749M | $338.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2122.46x | 22.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 65.09x | 21.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.35x | 14.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 1.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 25.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.03x | 25.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HD delivers a 110.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $110 in annual profit, vs $-1 for BXC. BXC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HD's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BXC scores 5/9 vs HD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.7% | +110.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +13.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | +32.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +29.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.09x | 1.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $288M | $17.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $386M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $674M | $19.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.69x | 8.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HD five years ago would be worth $10,797 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,158 for BXC. Over the past 12 months, HD leads with a -7.5% total return vs BXC's -9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HD at 6.7% vs BXC's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.6% | -5.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.3% | -7.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.0% | +21.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.6% | +8.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +749.0% | +185.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.6% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
HD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HD is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BXC's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HD currently trades 75.7% from its 52-week high vs BXC's 66.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $88.30 | $426.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.84 | $310.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.3% | +75.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.5 | 36.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 109K | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
HD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BXC as "Buy" and HD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.3% upside for HD (target: $408) vs 16.1% for BXC (target: $68). HD is the only dividend payer here at 2.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.00 | $408.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $9.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.8% | 0.0% |
HD leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BXC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
BXC vs HD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BXC or HD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the stronger pick with 3. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC). The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BXC or HD?
On trailing P/E, The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the cheapest at 22. 7x versus BlueLinx Holdings Inc. at 2122. 5x. On forward P/E, The Home Depot, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BXC or HD?
Over the past 5 years, The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) delivered a total return of +8. 0%, compared to +1. 6% for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BXC returned +749. 0% versus HD's +185. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BXC or HD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus BlueLinx Holdings Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning BXC is approximately 123% more volatile than HD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 109% versus 148% for The Home Depot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BXC or HD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is pulling ahead at 3. 2% versus 0. 1% for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Home Depot, Inc. grew EPS -4. 6% year-over-year, compared to -99. 6% for BlueLinx Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HD leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BXC or HD?
The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HD leads at 12. 7% versus 1. 1% for BXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HD leads at 33. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BXC or HD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) trades at 21. 5x forward P/E versus 65. 1x for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. — 43. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HD: 26. 3% to $408. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — BXC or HD?
In this comparison, HD (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. BXC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BXC or HD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 2. 8% yield, +185. 4% 10Y return). BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HD: +185. 4%, BXC: +749. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BXC and HD?
These companies operate in different sectors (BXC (Industrials) and HD (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
HD pays a dividend while BXC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.