Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BY vs MGYR vs HONE vs FIS vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
BY vs MGYR vs HONE vs FIS vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.52B | $115M | $522M | $24.47B | $10.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $629M | $58M | $314M | $10.89B | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $130M | $11M | $26M | $382M | $519M |
| Gross Margin | 66.1% | 60.3% | 50.9% | 38.1% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 29.1% | 23.6% | 10.9% | 17.5% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 11.3x | 13.3x | 7.5x | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $565M | $49M | $517M | $4.01B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $7M | $231M | $599M | $102M |
BY vs MGYR vs HONE vs FIS vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY) | 100 | 274.7 | +174.7% |
| Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
| HarborOne Bancorp, … (HONE) | 100 | 151.8 | +51.8% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BY vs MGYR vs HONE vs FIS vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in bank quality.
- NIM 4.0% vs HONE's 2.2%
- 20.7% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- +30.3% vs FIS's -35.3%
MGYR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 26.8%
- 125.8% 10Y total return vs JKHY's 94.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 41.3%, current ratio 13.39x
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.7%, current ratio 13.39x
Among these 5 stocks, HONE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.31 vs JKHY's 2.16
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.16
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%
JKHY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
- 17.0% ROA vs HONE's 0.5%, ROIC 21.0% vs 2.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% NII/revenue growth vs BY's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.7% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs HONE's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.3% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs HONE's 0.5%, ROIC 21.0% vs 2.3% |
BY vs MGYR vs HONE vs FIS vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BY vs MGYR vs HONE vs FIS vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BY leads in 2 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • JKHY leads 1 • MGYR leads 0 • HONE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 186.5x MGYR's $58M. BY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $629M | $58M | $314M | $10.9B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $188M | $16M | $37M | $3.8B | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $130M | $11M | $26M | $382M | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $136M | $11M | $46M | $2.8B | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.1% | +60.3% | +50.9% | +38.1% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +23.6% | +10.9% | +17.5% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +16.7% | +8.7% | +3.5% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +16.8% | +0.8% | +26.1% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +8.2% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | +51.5% | +11.1% | +92.3% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.3x trailing earnings, MGYR trades at a 82% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MGYR offers better value at 0.35x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $115M | $522M | $24.5B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $156M | $808M | $27.9B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.55x | 11.33x | 18.33x | 63.00x | 23.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.34x | — | 13.30x | 7.54x | 21.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.47x | 0.35x | 1.23x | 2.58x | 2.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.76x | 10.61x | 20.84x | 7.66x | 13.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.41x | 1.96x | 1.66x | 2.29x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 0.93x | 0.87x | 1.76x | 5.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.12x | 11.67x | 200.70x | 9.97x | 17.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HONE's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGYR scores 7/9 vs JKHY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +9.2% | +4.6% | +2.7% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +1.1% | +0.5% | +1.1% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +6.7% | +2.3% | +6.0% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +2.4% | +3.5% | +6.6% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.41x | 0.90x | 0.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $505M | $42M | $285M | $3.4B | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $7M | $231M | $599M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $565M | $49M | $517M | $4.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.98x | 0.66x | 0.24x | 4.64x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGYR five years ago would be worth $17,310 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BY leads with a +30.3% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BY at 24.5% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.8% | +1.9% | — | -27.3% | -17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.3% | +25.7% | +7.9% | -35.3% | -13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.9% | +85.6% | +58.9% | -6.6% | -1.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.1% | +73.1% | -5.8% | -63.2% | +0.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.3% | +125.8% | +88.3% | -13.2% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.5% | +22.9% | +16.7% | -2.2% | -0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BY and MGYR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGYR is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HONE's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BY currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 0.28x | 1.05x | 0.76x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.33 | $20.00 | $14.29 | $82.74 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.75 | $14.35 | $10.57 | $43.30 | $141.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +88.4% | +84.7% | +57.1% | +75.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 47.4 | 32.5 | 43.3 | 28.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 195K | 6K | 0 | 5.5M | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BY as "Hold", HONE as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 15.7% for HONE (target: $14). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs BY's 1.20%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | — | $14.00 | $67.38 | $203.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | — | 6 | 37 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +1.7% | +2.6% | +3.5% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $0.29 | $0.32 | $1.63 | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.7% | +4.1% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
BY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BY vs MGYR vs HONE vs FIS vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BY or MGYR or HONE or FIS or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY). Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BY or MGYR or HONE or FIS or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the cheapest at 11. 3x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BY or MGYR or HONE or FIS or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) delivered a total return of +73. 1%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGYR returned +125. 8% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BY or MGYR or HONE or FIS or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning HONE is approximately 273% more volatile than MGYR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 90% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BY or MGYR or HONE or FIS or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus 1. 3% for Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 78. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BY or MGYR or HONE or FIS or JKHY?
Byline Bancorp, Inc.
(BY) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BY leads at 29. 1% versus 10. 9% for HONE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BY leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BY or MGYR or HONE or FIS or JKHY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — BY or MGYR or HONE or FIS or JKHY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 2% for Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY).
09Is BY or MGYR or HONE or FIS or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 7% yield, +125. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGYR: +125. 8%, HONE: +88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BY and MGYR and HONE and FIS and JKHY?
These companies operate in different sectors (BY (Financial Services) and MGYR (Financial Services) and HONE (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BY is a small-cap deep-value stock; MGYR is a small-cap deep-value stock; HONE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.