Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Internet Content & Information
BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $12.38B | $1.41B | $1.38B | $422M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.01B | $17.96B | $595M | $429M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.49B | $-13M | $109M | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 84.5% | 16.7% | 103.0% | 81.3% |
| Operating Margin | 26.9% | 0.8% | 20.7% | 2.9% |
| Forward P/E | 1.6x | 8.1x | 7.4x | 5.6x |
| Total Debt | $302M | $2.39B | $381M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.55B | $871M | $298M | $129M |
BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kanzhun Limited (BZ) | 100 | 35.4 | -64.6% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 25.1 | -74.9% |
| Upwork Inc. (UPWK) | 100 | 15.1 | -84.9% |
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.22
- Rev growth 23.6%, EPS growth 43.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.0%
- 23.6% revenue growth vs MAN's 0.6%
- Lower P/E (1.6x vs 7.4x)
MAN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- -30.8% 10Y total return vs BZ's -60.8%
- 4.7% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
UPWK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FVRR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 1.94x
- Beta 0.97, current ratio 1.94x
- Beta 0.97 vs BZ's 1.22, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.6% revenue growth vs MAN's 0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.6x vs 7.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.1% margin vs MAN's -0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs BZ's 1.22, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -9.4% vs FVRR's -59.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs MAN's -0.1%, ROIC 7.3% vs 5.6% |
BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BZ leads in 2 of 6 categories
MAN leads 2 • UPWK leads 1 • FVRR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 41.8x FVRR's $429M. BZ is the more profitable business, keeping 31.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAN's -0.1%. On growth, BZ holds the edge at +13.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.0B | $18.0B | $595M | $429M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.2B | $236M | $150M | $26M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.5B | -$13M | $109M | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.3B | -$161M | $224M | $103M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.5% | +16.7% | +103.0% | +81.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.9% | +0.8% | +20.7% | +2.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | -0.1% | +18.3% | +6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.5% | -0.9% | +37.7% | +24.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | +7.1% | -100.0% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.5% | +36.2% | +29.6% | +9.7% |
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, UPWK trades at a 54% valuation discount to BZ's 27.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BZ's 44.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $422M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.0B | $2.9B | $1.5B | $299M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.61x | -104.90x | 12.78x | 20.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.64x | 8.12x | 7.37x | 5.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 44.10x | 9.02x | 9.66x | 22.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.45x | 0.08x | 1.76x | 0.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.92x | 0.69x | 2.35x | 1.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.36x | — | 5.71x | 4.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPWK delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MAN. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVRR scores 8/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.9% | -0.6% | +17.9% | +7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.7% | -0.1% | +8.5% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +5.6% | +14.3% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +6.2% | +16.2% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 1.16x | 0.60x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.3B | $1.5B | $83M | -$124M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.6B | $871M | $298M | $129M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $302M | $2.4B | $381M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.98x | 146.13x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BZ and MAN and UPWK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BZ five years ago would be worth $3,922 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $652 for FVRR. Over the past 12 months, BZ leads with a -9.4% total return vs FVRR's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UPWK at 9.7% vs FVRR's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.9% | +1.2% | -46.5% | -40.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.4% | -17.0% | -34.8% | -59.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.8% | -46.4% | +32.0% | -58.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.8% | -64.9% | -74.8% | -93.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.8% | -30.8% | -49.9% | -70.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.5% | -18.8% | +9.7% | -25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MAN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FVRR is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BZ's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAN currently trades 64.3% from its 52-week high vs FVRR's 34.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 0.89x | 1.12x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.26 | $47.34 | $22.84 | $34.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.85 | $25.15 | $10.02 | $9.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.4% | +64.3% | +46.5% | +34.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 47.1 | 35.0 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 1.1M | 3.4M | 924K |
Analyst Outlook
BZ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BZ as "Buy", MAN as "Hold", UPWK as "Buy", FVRR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for UPWK (target: $23) vs 24.5% for MAN (target: $38). MAN is the only dividend payer here at 4.71% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $37.86 | $23.14 | $16.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 29 | 23 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.43 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +2.7% | +9.8% | +7.7% |
BZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). MAN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kanzhun Limited (BZ) is the stronger pick with 23.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Upwork Inc. (UPWK) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kanzhun Limited (BZ) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR?
On trailing P/E, Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus Kanzhun Limited at 27. 6x. On forward P/E, Kanzhun Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR?
Over the past 5 years, Kanzhun Limited (BZ) delivered a total return of -60.
8%, compared to -93. 5% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAN returned -31. 5% versus FVRR's -71. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Kanzhun Limited's 1. 21β — meaning BZ is approximately 36% more volatile than MAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kanzhun Limited (BZ) is pulling ahead at 23.
6% versus 0. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kanzhun Limited grew EPS 43. 9% year-over-year, compared to -109. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BZ leads at 20. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR?
Kanzhun Limited (BZ) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
5% net margin versus -0. 1% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus -0. 3% for FVRR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BZ leads at 83. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kanzhun Limited (BZ) trades at 1.
6x forward P/E versus 8. 1x for ManpowerGroup Inc. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 118. 1% to $23. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR?
In this comparison, MAN (4.
7% yield) pays a dividend. BZ, UPWK, FVRR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 4. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAN: -31. 5%, BZ: -61. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BZ and MAN and UPWK and FVRR?
These companies operate in different sectors (BZ (Industrials) and MAN (Industrials) and UPWK (Industrials) and FVRR (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BZ is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FVRR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MAN pays a dividend while BZ, UPWK, FVRR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.