Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BZ
Kanzhun Limited

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$12.38B
5Y Perf.-64.6%
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.41B
5Y Perf.-74.9%
UPWK
Upwork Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.38B
5Y Perf.-84.9%
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • IL
Market Cap$422M
5Y Perf.-95.3%
TASK
TaskUs, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$573M
5Y Perf.-81.2%

BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BZ logoBZ
MAN logoMAN
UPWK logoUPWK
FVRR logoFVRR
TASK logoTASK
IndustryStaffing & Employment ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesInternet Content & InformationInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$12.38B$1.41B$1.38B$422M$573M
Revenue (TTM)$8.01B$17.96B$595M$429M$1.21B
Net Income (TTM)$2.49B$-13M$109M$29M$105M
Gross Margin84.5%16.7%103.0%81.3%35.5%
Operating Margin26.9%0.8%20.7%2.9%11.6%
Forward P/E1.6x8.1x6.1x5.6x4.9x
Total Debt$302M$2.39B$381M$5M$298M
Cash & Equiv.$2.55B$871M$298M$129M$212M

BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BZ
MAN
UPWK
FVRR
TASK
StockJun 21May 26Return
Kanzhun Limited (BZ)10035.4-64.6%
ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN)10025.1-74.9%
Upwork Inc. (UPWK)10015.1-84.9%
Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR)1004.7-95.3%
TaskUs, Inc. (TASK)10018.8-81.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BZ leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. ManpowerGroup Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. FVRR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BZ
Kanzhun Limited
The Growth Play

BZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 23.6%, EPS growth 43.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.0%
  • 23.6% revenue growth vs MAN's 0.6%
  • Lower P/E (1.6x vs 4.9x)
  • 31.1% margin vs MAN's -0.1%
Best for: growth exposure
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.
The Income Pick

MAN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.03, yield 4.7%
  • -30.8% 10Y total return vs BZ's -60.8%
  • 4.7% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
UPWK
Upwork Inc.
The Value Angle

UPWK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

FVRR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 1.94x
  • Beta 0.97, current ratio 1.94x
  • Beta 0.97 vs BZ's 1.22, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
TASK
TaskUs, Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, TASK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBZ logoBZ23.6% revenue growth vs MAN's 0.6%
ValueBZ logoBZLower P/E (1.6x vs 4.9x)
Quality / MarginsBZ logoBZ31.1% margin vs MAN's -0.1%
Stability / SafetyFVRR logoFVRRBeta 0.97 vs BZ's 1.22, lower leverage
DividendsMAN logoMAN4.7% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BZ logoBZ-9.4% vs FVRR's -59.7%
Efficiency (ROA)BZ logoBZ11.7% ROA vs MAN's -0.1%, ROIC 7.3% vs 5.6%

BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BZKanzhun Limited
FY 2024
Online Recruitment Services To Enterprises Customers
98.8%$7.3B
Others
1.2%$86M
MANManpowerGroup Inc.
FY 2024
StaffingandInterim
87.5%$15.7B
Outcome-BasedSolutionsandConsulting
7.0%$1.3B
PermanentRecruitment
2.7%$492M
Other
2.7%$482M
Franchise
0.1%$14M
UPWKUpwork Inc.
FY 2025
Enterprise
86.7%$683M
Marketplace
13.3%$105M
FVRRFiverr International Ltd.
FY 2025
Marketplace Revenue
69.0%$297M
Services Revenue
31.0%$133M
TASKTaskUs, Inc.
FY 2025
Digital Customer Experience
75.5%$662M
AI Services
24.5%$214M

BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBZLAGGINGTASK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 41.8x FVRR's $429M. BZ is the more profitable business, keeping 31.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAN's -0.1%. On growth, BZ holds the edge at +13.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBZ logoBZKanzhun LimitedMAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$8.0B$18.0B$595M$429M$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.2B$236M$150M$26M$204M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.5B-$13M$109M$29M$105M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3.3B-$161M$224M$103M$88M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+84.5%+16.7%+103.0%+81.3%+35.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.9%+0.8%+20.7%+2.9%+11.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+31.1%-0.1%+18.3%+6.7%+8.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+41.5%-0.9%+37.7%+24.1%+7.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.2%+7.1%-100.0%-1.6%+10.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+63.5%+36.2%+29.6%+9.7%+13.0%
BZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.8x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 79% valuation discount to BZ's 27.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TASK's 3.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BZ's 44.1x.

MetricBZ logoBZKanzhun LimitedMAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$12.4B$1.4B$1.4B$422M$573M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$12.0B$2.9B$1.5B$299M$660M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS27.61x-104.90x12.78x20.98x5.79x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1.64x8.12x6.12x5.59x4.89x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple44.10x9.02x9.66x22.11x3.26x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue11.45x0.08x1.76x0.98x0.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.92x0.69x2.35x1.06x0.99x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF31.36x5.71x4.06x7.78x
MAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — FVRR and TASK each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

TASK delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MAN. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVRR scores 8/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBZ logoBZKanzhun LimitedMAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.9%-0.6%+17.9%+7.0%+21.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+11.7%-0.1%+8.5%+3.1%+10.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.3%+5.6%+14.3%-0.2%+16.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.2%+6.2%+16.2%-0.3%+16.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–971687
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x1.16x0.60x0.01x0.50x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2.3B$1.5B$83M-$124M$86M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.6B$871M$298M$129M$212M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$302M$2.4B$381M$5M$298M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.98x146.13x7.12x
Evenly matched — FVRR and TASK each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — BZ and MAN and UPWK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BZ five years ago would be worth $3,922 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $652 for FVRR. Over the past 12 months, BZ leads with a -9.4% total return vs FVRR's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UPWK at 9.7% vs FVRR's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBZ logoBZKanzhun LimitedMAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-31.9%+1.2%-46.5%-40.3%-12.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-9.4%-17.0%-34.8%-59.7%-28.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-20.8%-46.4%+32.0%-58.1%-18.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.8%-64.9%-74.8%-93.5%-67.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.8%-30.8%-49.9%-70.6%-67.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-7.5%-18.8%+9.7%-25.2%-6.4%
Evenly matched — BZ and MAN and UPWK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MAN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FVRR is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BZ's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAN currently trades 64.3% from its 52-week high vs FVRR's 34.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBZ logoBZKanzhun LimitedMAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.21x0.89x1.12x0.91x1.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$25.26$47.34$22.84$34.13$18.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.85$25.15$10.02$9.67$5.89
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+56.4%+64.3%+46.5%+34.4%+34.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.347.135.052.942.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.7M1.1M3.4M924K736K
MAN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BZ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: BZ as "Buy", MAN as "Hold", UPWK as "Buy", FVRR as "Hold", TASK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 96.6% upside for BZ (target: $28) vs 24.5% for MAN (target: $38). MAN is the only dividend payer here at 4.71% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBZ logoBZKanzhun LimitedMAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FVRR logoFVRRFiverr Internatio…TASK logoTASKTaskUs, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.00$37.86$16.13$16.83$10.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts929231711
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises100
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.43
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.0%+2.7%+9.8%+7.7%+4.8%
BZ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). MAN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallKanzhun Limited (BZ)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BZ vs MAN vs UPWK vs FVRR vs TASK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR or TASK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Kanzhun Limited (BZ) is the stronger pick with 23.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (4. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kanzhun Limited (BZ) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?

On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.

(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus Kanzhun Limited at 27. 6x. On forward P/E, Kanzhun Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?

Over the past 5 years, Kanzhun Limited (BZ) delivered a total return of -60.

8%, compared to -93. 5% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAN returned -31. 5% versus FVRR's -71. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ManpowerGroup Inc.

(MAN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus TaskUs, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning TASK is approximately 38% more volatile than MAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kanzhun Limited (BZ) is pulling ahead at 23.

6% versus 0. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -109. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BZ leads at 20. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?

Kanzhun Limited (BZ) is the more profitable company, earning 21.

5% net margin versus -0. 1% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus -0. 3% for FVRR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BZ leads at 83. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR or TASK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Kanzhun Limited (BZ) trades at 1.

6x forward P/E versus 8. 1x for ManpowerGroup Inc. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BZ: 96. 6% to $28. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR or TASK?

In this comparison, MAN (4.

7% yield) pays a dividend. BZ, UPWK, FVRR, TASK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BZ or MAN or UPWK or FVRR or TASK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ManpowerGroup Inc.

(MAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 4. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAN: -31. 5%, TASK: -67. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BZ and MAN and UPWK and FVRR and TASK?

These companies operate in different sectors (BZ (Industrials) and MAN (Industrials) and UPWK (Industrials) and FVRR (Communication Services) and TASK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BZ is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FVRR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock. MAN pays a dividend while BZ, UPWK, FVRR, TASK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BZ

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MAN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UPWK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FVRR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TASK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BZ and MAN and UPWK and FVRR and TASK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BZ: 13.2% · MAN: 7.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.